Literature DB >> 3171639

Gustatory responsiveness of fibers in the hamster glossopharyngeal nerve.

T Hanamori1, I J Miller, D V Smith.   

Abstract

1. Mammalian taste receptors are distributed within separate subpopulations, innervated by branches of cranial nerves VII, IX, and X. Most gustatory electrophysiology has focused on input from the fungiform papillae on the anterior portion of the tongue, carried by the chorda tympani branch of the VIIth nerve. However, only a small percentage of the taste buds are located in the fungiform papillae (approximately 18% in the hamster). There have been no studies on the hamster's IXth nerve, which innervates greater than 50% of its taste buds, and most other studies of IXth nerve function have employed only whole-nerve recording. 2. Action potentials were recorded from 83 individual fibers in the IXth nerve of the hamster. Stimuli were five concentrations each of sucrose, NaCl, HCl, and quinine hydrochloride (QHCl), all presented to every fiber at 37 degrees C. Responses were quantified as the number of impulses in 10 s minus the preceding 10 s of spontaneous activity. 3. Across these concentration series, HCl and QHCl were by far the most excitatory stimuli, with mean responses across all cells three to four times greater than those evoked by sucrose or NaCl. The order of effectiveness of the stimuli was H greater than Q much greater than N greater than S. 4. Of the 83 fibers, 56 were stimulated via the foliate papillae and 27 via the single vallate papilla. No fibers responded to both of these fields. There were generally no differences in the sensitivity of these two subpopulations of taste buds, except that QHCl was more effective when applied to the foliates. 5. A "total" response measure was derived by summing the excitatory responses to each stimulus across the entire concentration series. The fibers were then classified according to the best total response, resulting in 52 HCl-, 19 QHCl-, 8 sucrose- and 4 NaCl-best cells. Considering the slope of the concentration-response functions as a criterion for classification produced very similar results. The fiber classification varied somewhat with concentration, with more fibers categorized as HCl- and QHCl-best at the higher concentration levels. 6. Breadth of responsiveness was measured using the equation developed by Smith and Travers. At the concentrations used to examine hamster chorda tympani fibers, IXth nerve fibers were not very responsive and were quite narrowly tuned to the four taste qualities. At higher concentrations the fibers became more broadly responsive across the four stimuli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3171639     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  14 in total

1.  Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Clare M Mathes; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  In vivo recordings from rat geniculate ganglia: taste response properties of individual greater superficial petrosal and chorda tympani neurones.

Authors:  Suzanne I Sollars; David L Hill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Synaptic characteristics of rostral nucleus of the solitary tract neurons with input from the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves.

Authors:  Min Wang; Robert M Bradley
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Central taste anatomy and physiology.

Authors:  Roberto Vincis; Alfredo Fontanini
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2019

5.  Encoding Taste: From Receptors to Perception.

Authors:  Stephen D Roper
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022

Review 6.  Cracking taste codes by tapping into sensory neuron impulse traffic.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Robert F Lundy; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Water as an independent taste modality.

Authors:  Andrew M Rosen; Andre T Roussin; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  ENaC-Dependent Sodium Chloride Taste Responses in the Regenerated Rat Chorda Tympani Nerve After Lingual Gustatory Deafferentation Depend on the Taste Bud Field Reinnervated.

Authors:  Enshe Jiang; Ginger D Blonde; Mircea Garcea; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Distribution and characterization of functional amiloride-sensitive sodium channels in rat tongue.

Authors:  R E Doolin; T A Gilbertson
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  A Taste Circuit that Regulates Ingestion by Integrating Food and Hunger Signals.

Authors:  Nilay Yapici; Raphael Cohn; Christian Schusterreiter; Vanessa Ruta; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.