Literature DB >> 25914482

Visual distraction alone for the improvement of colonoscopy-related pain and satisfaction.

Shotaro Umezawa1, Takuma Higurashi1, Shiori Uchiyama1, Eiji Sakai1, Hidenori Ohkubo1, Hiroki Endo1, Takashi Nonaka1, Atsushi Nakajima1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effect of a relaxing visual distraction alone on patient pain, anxiety, and satisfaction during colonoscopy.
METHODS: This study was designed as an endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial with 60 consecutively enrolled patients who underwent elective colonoscopy at Yokohama City University Hospital, Japan. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 watched a silent movie using a head-mounted display, while group 2 only wore the display. All of the colonoscopies were performed without sedation. We examined pain, anxiety, and the satisfaction of patients before and after the procedure using questionnaires that included the Visual Analog Scale. Patients were also asked whether they would be willing to use the same method for a repeat procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were allocated to two groups. Two patients assigned to group 1 and one patient assigned to group 2 were excluded after the randomization. Twenty-eight patients in group 1 and 29 patients in group 2 were entered into the final analysis. The groups were similar in terms of gender, age, history of prior colonoscopy, and pre-procedural anxiety score. The two groups were comparable in terms of the cecal insertion rate, the time to reach the cecum, the time needed for the total procedure, and vital signs. The median anxiety score during the colonoscopy did not differ significantly between the two groups (median scores, 20 vs 24). The median pain score during the procedure was lower in group 1, but the difference was not significant (median scores, 24.5 vs 42). The patients in group 1 reported significantly higher median post-procedural satisfaction levels, compared with the patients in group 2 (median scores, 89 vs 72, P = 0.04). Nearly three-quarters of the patients in group 1 wished to use the same method for repeat procedures, and the difference in rates between the two groups was statistically significant (75.0% vs 48.3%, P = 0.04). Patients with greater levels of anxiety before the procedure tended to feel a painful sensation. Among patients with a pre-procedural anxiety score of 50 or higher, the anxiety score during the procedure was significantly lower in the group that received the visual distraction (median scores, 20 vs 68, P = 0.05); the pain score during the colonoscopy was also lower (median scores, 23 vs 57, P = 0.04). No adverse effects arising from the visual distraction were recognized.
CONCLUSION: Visual distraction alone improves satisfaction in patients undergoing colonoscopy and decreases anxiety and pain during the procedure among patients with a high pre-procedural anxiety score.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer screening; Patient satisfaction; Photic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25914482      PMCID: PMC4402320          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  30 in total

1.  Ethnic differences in physical pain sensitivity: role of acculturation.

Authors:  Michelle Y P Chan; Takeshi Hamamura; Kristin Janschewitz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Aromatherapy for reducing colonoscopy related procedural anxiety and physiological parameters: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Pei-Hsin Hu; Yen-Chun Peng; Yu-Ting Lin; Chi-Sen Chang; Ming-Chiu Ou
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

3.  Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.

Authors:  C Hassan; R Benamouzig; C Spada; T Ponchon; A Zullo; J C Saurin; G Costamagna
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Sidney J Winawer; Michael J O'Brien; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Benjamin F Hankey; Weiji Shi; John H Bond; Melvin Schapiro; Joel F Panish; Edward T Stewart; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Ethnic differences in responses to multiple experimental pain stimuli.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Robert R Edwards; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Hypoxaemia and myocardial ischaemia during colonoscopy.

Authors:  C Holm; M Christensen; V Rasmussen; S Schulze; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Reduction of conscious sedation requirements by olfactory stimulation: a prospective randomized single-blinded trial.

Authors:  Krista Puttler; Beth Jaklic; Thomas S Rieg; Paul A Lucha
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.579

9.  Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; Stacy Riffle; Leann Michaels; Cynthia Morris; Jennifer Holub; Jean A Shapiro; Marcia A Ciol; Michael B Kimmey; Laura C Seeff; David Lieberman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Factors associated with abdominal discomfort during colonoscopy: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  David A Elphick; Mark T Donnelly; Karen S Smith; Stuart A Riley
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.566

View more
  13 in total

1.  Implementation of virtual reality technology to decrease patients' pain and nervousness during colonoscopies: a prospective randomised controlled single-blinded trial.

Authors:  Qizhi Liu; Yunhua Zang; Wei Zang; Wenpeng Cai; Weiwei Li; Ya'nan Guo; Cheng Xin; Xiaohuang Tu
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.410

2.  Factors Associated with Anxiety About Colonoscopy: The Preparation, the Procedure, and the Anticipated Findings.

Authors:  L A Shafer; J R Walker; C Waldman; C Yang; V Michaud; C N Bernstein; L Hathout; J Park; J Sisler; G Restall; K Wittmeier; H Singh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Anxiety Associated with Colonoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chengyue Yang; Vaelan Sriranjan; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; William Poluha; John R Walker; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Effect of audio and visual distraction on patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  A P De Silva; M A Niriella; Y Nandamuni; S D Nanayakkara; K R P Perera; S K Kodisinghe; K C E Subasinghe; A Pathmeswaran; H J de Silva
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-10-20

5.  The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Masahiro Sogabe; Toshiya Okahisa; Yuka Adachi; Masanori Takehara; Shinichi Hamada; Jun Okazaki; Yasuteru Fujino; Akira Fukuya; Kaizo Kagemoto; Akihiro Hirao; Koichi Okamoto; Masahiko Nakasono; Tetsuji Takayama
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Effects of audio and visual distraction on patients' vital signs and tolerance during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Masahiro Sogabe; Toshiya Okahisa; Akira Fukuya; Kaizo Kagemoto; Yasuyuki Okada; Yuka Adachi; Takeshi Kurihara; Toru Nii; Satoshi Teramae; Hironori Tanaka; Tetsu Tomonari; Koichi Okamoto; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Masahiko Nakasono; Tetsuji Takayama
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Comparison of the Effects of Visual and Auditory Distractions on Fistula Cannulation Pain among Older Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mina Ghadimi Aghbolagh; Tahereh Bahrami; Nahid Rejeh; Majideh Heravi-Karimooi; Seyed Davood Tadrisi; Mojtaba Vaismoradi
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16

8.  The Effect of Virtual Reality on Pain and Anxiety During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Selda Karaveli Çakır; Sami Evirgen
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 9.  Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Role of Psychological, Social and Background Factors in Decision-making Process.

Authors:  Giulia Cossu; Luca Saba; Luigi Minerba; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2018-03-21

10.  Distraction Technique for pain reduction in Peripheral Venous Catheterization: randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Ihor Balanyuk; Giuseppina Ledonne; Marco Provenzano; Roberto Bianco; Cristina Meroni; Paola Ferri; Loris Bonetti
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.