Eric G Post1, Karen G Roos2, Stephen Rivas3, Tricia M Kasamatsu4, Jason Bennett4. 1. School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, CA. 2. Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Long Beach. 3. Newport Orthopedic Institute, Newport Beach, CA. 4. Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton.
Abstract
CONTEXT: California is currently the only state that does not regulate who can and cannot call themselves athletic trainers (ATs). Therefore, previous national or state-specific investigations may not have provided an accurate representation of AT availability at the secondary school level in California. Similarly, it is unknown whether the factors that influence AT availability in California, such as socioeconomic status, are similar to or different from those identified in previous studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the availability of ATs certified by the Board of Certification in California secondary schools and to examine potential factors influencing access to AT services in California secondary schools. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Representatives of 1270 California high schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Officials from member schools completed the 2017-2018 California Interscholastic Federation Participation Census. Respondents provided information regarding school type, student and student-athlete enrollment, whether the school had ATs on staff, and whether the ATs were certified by the Board of Certification. The socioeconomic status of public and charter schools was determined using the percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. RESULTS: More than half (54.6%) of schools reported that they either did not employ ATs (47.6%) or employed unqualified health personnel (UHP) in the role of AT (7.0%). Nearly 30% of student-athletes in California participated in athletics at a school that did not employ ATs (n = 191 626, 28.9%) and 8% of student-athletes participated at a school that employed UHP in the role of AT (n = 54 361, 8.2%). Schools that reported employing ATs had a lower proportion of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch than schools that did not employ ATs and schools that employed UHP (both P values < .001). CONCLUSIONS: With ongoing legislative efforts to obtain regulation of ATs in California, secondary school administrators are encouraged to hire ATs with the proper certification to enhance the patient care provided to student-athletes and improve health outcomes.
CONTEXT: California is currently the only state that does not regulate who can and cannot call themselves athletic trainers (ATs). Therefore, previous national or state-specific investigations may not have provided an accurate representation of AT availability at the secondary school level in California. Similarly, it is unknown whether the factors that influence AT availability in California, such as socioeconomic status, are similar to or different from those identified in previous studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the availability of ATs certified by the Board of Certification in California secondary schools and to examine potential factors influencing access to AT services in California secondary schools. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Representatives of 1270 California high schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Officials from member schools completed the 2017-2018 California Interscholastic Federation Participation Census. Respondents provided information regarding school type, student and student-athlete enrollment, whether the school had ATs on staff, and whether the ATs were certified by the Board of Certification. The socioeconomic status of public and charter schools was determined using the percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. RESULTS: More than half (54.6%) of schools reported that they either did not employ ATs (47.6%) or employed unqualified health personnel (UHP) in the role of AT (7.0%). Nearly 30% of student-athletes in California participated in athletics at a school that did not employ ATs (n = 191 626, 28.9%) and 8% of student-athletes participated at a school that employed UHP in the role of AT (n = 54 361, 8.2%). Schools that reported employing ATs had a lower proportion of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch than schools that did not employ ATs and schools that employed UHP (both P values < .001). CONCLUSIONS: With ongoing legislative efforts to obtain regulation of ATs in California, secondary school administrators are encouraged to hire ATs with the proper certification to enhance the patient care provided to student-athletes and improve health outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
appropriate medical coverage; health care access; socioeconomic status
Authors: Alicia Pike; Riana R Pryor; Stephanie M Mazerolle; Rebecca L Stearns; Douglas J Casa Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Janet E Simon; Erik A Wikstrom; Dustin R Grooms; Carrie L Docherty; Thomas P Dompier; Zachary Y Kerr Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Stephanie M Mazerolle; Samantha R Raso; Kelly D Pagnotta; Rebecca L Stearns; Douglas J Casa Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Samuel T Johnson; Marc F Norcross; Viktor E Bovbjerg; Mark A Hoffman; Eunwook Chang; Michael C Koester Journal: Sports Health Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 3.843
Authors: Hannah J Robison; Janet E Simon; Erik J Nelson; Sarah N Morris; Erin B Wasserman; Carrie L Docherty Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 3.824
Authors: Kartik Sidhar; Christine M Baugh; Julie C Wilson; Jack Spittler; Gregory A Walker; Aubrey M Armento; David R Howell Journal: J Clin Transl Res Date: 2022-07-18