CONTEXT: Availability of athletic trainer (AT) services in US secondary schools has recently been reported to be as high as 70%, but this only describes the public sector. The extent of AT coverage in private secondary school settings has yet to be investigated and may differ from the public secondary school setting for several reasons, including differences in funding sources. OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of AT services in US private secondary schools and identify the reasons why some schools did not employ ATs. DESIGN: Concurrent mixed-methods study. SETTING: Private secondary schools in the United States. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Of 5414 private secondary schools, 2044 (38%) responded to the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): School administrators responded to the survey via telephone or e-mail. This instrument was previously used in a study examining AT services among public secondary schools. Descriptive statistics provided national data. Open-ended questions were evaluated through content analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2044 schools that responded, 58% (1176/2044) offered AT services, including 28% (574/2040) full time, 25% (501/2042) part time, 4% (78/1918) per diem, and 20% (409/2042) from a hospital or clinic. A total of 84% (281 285/336 165) of athletes had access to AT services. Larger private secondary schools were more likely to have AT services available. Barriers to providing AT services in the private sector were budgetary constraints, school size and sports, and lack of awareness of the role of an AT. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the surveyed private secondary schools in the United States had AT services available; however, only 28% had a full-time AT. This demonstrates the need for increased medical coverage to provide athletes in this setting the appropriate level of care. Budgetary concerns, size of the school and sport offerings, and lack of awareness of the role of the AT continued to be barriers in the secondary school setting.
CONTEXT: Availability of athletic trainer (AT) services in US secondary schools has recently been reported to be as high as 70%, but this only describes the public sector. The extent of AT coverage in private secondary school settings has yet to be investigated and may differ from the public secondary school setting for several reasons, including differences in funding sources. OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of AT services in US private secondary schools and identify the reasons why some schools did not employ ATs. DESIGN: Concurrent mixed-methods study. SETTING: Private secondary schools in the United States. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Of 5414 private secondary schools, 2044 (38%) responded to the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): School administrators responded to the survey via telephone or e-mail. This instrument was previously used in a study examining AT services among public secondary schools. Descriptive statistics provided national data. Open-ended questions were evaluated through content analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2044 schools that responded, 58% (1176/2044) offered AT services, including 28% (574/2040) full time, 25% (501/2042) part time, 4% (78/1918) per diem, and 20% (409/2042) from a hospital or clinic. A total of 84% (281 285/336 165) of athletes had access to AT services. Larger private secondary schools were more likely to have AT services available. Barriers to providing AT services in the private sector were budgetary constraints, school size and sports, and lack of awareness of the role of an AT. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the surveyed private secondary schools in the United States had AT services available; however, only 28% had a full-time AT. This demonstrates the need for increased medical coverage to provide athletes in this setting the appropriate level of care. Budgetary concerns, size of the school and sport offerings, and lack of awareness of the role of the AT continued to be barriers in the secondary school setting.
Entities:
Keywords:
athletes; athletic trainers; high school; medical coverage; sports
Authors: Douglas J Casa; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Scott A Anderson; Ronald W Courson; Jonathan F Heck; Carolyn C Jimenez; Brendon P McDermott; Michael G Miller; Rebecca L Stearns; Erik E Swartz; Katie M Walsh Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Douglas J Casa; Jon Almquist; Scott A Anderson; Lindsay Baker; Michael F Bergeron; Brian Biagioli; Barry Boden; Joel S Brenner; Michael Carroll; Bob Colgate; Larry Cooper; Ron Courson; David Csillan; Julie K Demartini; Jonathan A Drezner; Tim Erickson; Michael S Ferrara; Steven J Fleck; Rob Franks; Kevin M Guskiewicz; William R Holcomb; Robert A Huggins; Rebecca M Lopez; Thom Mayer; Patrick McHenry; Jason P Mihalik; Francis G O'Connor; Kelly D Pagnotta; Riana R Pryor; John Reynolds; Rebecca L Stearns; Verle Valentine Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Riana R Pryor; Douglas J Casa; Lesley W Vandermark; Rebecca L Stearns; Sarah M Attanasio; Garrett J Fontaine; Alex M Wafer Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: William M Adams; Stephanie M Mazerolle; Douglas J Casa; Robert A Huggins; Laura Burton Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Stephanie M Mazerolle; Samantha R Raso; Kelly D Pagnotta; Rebecca L Stearns; Douglas J Casa Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Alicia M Pike; Riana R Pryor; Lesley W Vandermark; Stephanie M Mazerolle; Douglas J Casa Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Alicia M Pike Lacy; Christianne M Eason; Rebecca L Stearns; Sararat Tosakoon; Douglas J Casa Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Alicia M Pike; William M Adams; Robert A Huggins; Stephanie M Mazerolle; Douglas J Casa Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Robert A Huggins; Kelly A Coleman; Sarah M Attanasio; G Larry Cooper; Brad D Endres; Ronald C Harper; Kasey L Huemme; Rachel F Morris; Alicia M Pike Lacy; Bart C Peterson; Riana R Pryor; Douglas J Casa Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Patricia R Roby; Kristina B Metzger; Catherine C McDonald; Daniel J Corwin; Colin M Huber; Declan A Patton; Susan S Margulies; Matthew F Grady; Christina L Master; Kristy B Arbogast Journal: Phys Sportsmed Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 2.241