Literature DB >> 31713704

Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study.

Sergio Castrejón-Castrejón1, Marcel Martínez Cossiani1, Marta Ortega Molina1, Carlos Escobar1, Consuelo Froilán Torres2, Nerea Gonzalo Bada2, Marta Díaz de la Torre2, José Manuel Suárez Parga2, José Luis López Sendón1, José Luis Merino3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by point-by-point radiofrequency application (PPRF) results in longer procedures than that achieved by single-shot ablation techniques. In addition, it is associated with significant risk of oesophageal injury. The POWER-FAST pilot study evaluated the feasibility and safety of PVI by high-power short-duration (HPSD) PPRF.
METHODS: HPSD PPRF around the PVs was done in 48 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation. Fifty watts was delivered until a predefined lesion index value was reached (LSI ≥ 5 or Abl-I ≥ 350) and 60 W during 7-10 s in the first 18 and last 30 patients, respectively. A control group of 47 consecutive patients who had undergone PVI before the HPSD group with conventional PPRF (30 W for 30 s) was included for reference. Echocardiography and oesophageal endoscopy was performed shortly after ablation in all patients.
RESULTS: PVI of all targeted veins was achieved in 98% and 100% of patients of the conventional and HPSD groups, respectively (p = 0.59). Total radiofrequency time was 34 ± 11, 24 ± 8, and 15 ± 5 min in groups 30 W, 50 W, and 60 W (p < 0.001). Audible steam pops occurred in 4 out of 48 (8%) patients in the HPSD group, accounting for 4 (0.08%) out of 5 269 HPSD radiofrequency applications. No patient in the HPSD group developed pericardial effusion. The incidence of oesophageal lesions was 28%, 22%, and 0% in groups 30 W, 50 W, and 60 W, respectively (p = 0.007)
CONCLUSIONS: PVI can be achieved with HPSD PPRF in most patients. This approach appears safe and associated with low risk of esophageal damage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Complications; Esophageal damage; High power; Pulmonary vein isolation; Radiofrequency

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31713704     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00645-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  20 in total

1.  Longer Duration Versus Increasing Power During Radiofrequency Ablation Yields Different Ablation Lesion Characteristics.

Authors:  Ryan T Borne; William H Sauer; Matthew M Zipse; Lijun Zheng; Wendy Tzou; Duy T Nguyen
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-10

2.  High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Safety, efficacy, and long-term durability.

Authors:  Michael Barkagan; Fernando M Contreras-Valdes; Eran Leshem; Alfred E Buxton; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Elad Anter
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-20

3.  Atrial fibrillation ablation: "perpetual motion" of open irrigated tip catheters at 50 W is safe and improves outcomes.

Authors:  Roger A Winkle; R Hardwin Mead; Gregory Engel; Rob A Patrawala
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Incidental and ablation-induced findings during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients after ablation of atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study of 425 patients.

Authors:  H Knopp; U Halm; R Lamberts; I Knigge; M Zachäus; P Sommer; S Richter; A Bollmann; G Hindricks; D Husser
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Very High Power, Short Duration, Temperature-Controlled Lesions: The QDOT-FAST Trial.

Authors:  Vivek Y Reddy; Massimo Grimaldi; Tom De Potter; Johan M Vijgen; Alan Bulava; Mattias Francis Duytschaever; Martin Martinek; Andrea Natale; Sebastien Knecht; Petr Neuzil; Helmut Pürerfellner
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-05-08

6.  In Vitro Validation of the Lesion Size Index to Predict Lesion Width and Depth After Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Vittorio Calzolari; Luca De Mattia; Stefano Indiani; Martino Crosato; Alberto Furlanetto; Claudia Licciardello; Paolo Antonio Maria Squasi; Zoran Olivari
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-10-16

7.  Thermal esophageal lesions after radiofrequency catheter ablation of left atrial arrhythmias.

Authors:  Ulrich Halm; Thomas Gaspar; Markus Zachäus; Stephan Sack; Arash Arya; Christopher Piorkowski; Ingrid Knigge; Gerhard Hindricks; Daniela Husser
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Evaluation of a Strategy Aiming to Enclose the Pulmonary Veins With Contiguous and Optimized Radiofrequency Lesions in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Philippe Taghji; Milad El Haddad; Thomas Phlips; Michael Wolf; Sebastien Knecht; Yves Vandekerckhove; Rene Tavernier; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Mattias Duytschaever
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-09-27

9.  Five seconds of 50-60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation.

Authors:  Abhishek Bhaskaran; William Chik; Jim Pouliopoulos; Chrishan Nalliah; Pierre Qian; Tony Barry; Fazlur Nadri; Rahul Samanta; Ying Tran; Stuart Thomas; Pramesh Kovoor; Aravinda Thiagalingam
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Atrial fibrillation ablation using very short duration 50 W ablations and contact force sensing catheters.

Authors:  Roger A Winkle; Ryan Moskovitz; R Hardwin Mead; Gregory Engel; Melissa H Kong; William Fleming; Jonathan Salcedo; Rob A Patrawala; John H Tranter; Isaac Shai
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 1.900

View more
  16 in total

1.  [Pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency ablation].

Authors:  Leon Iden; Sonia Busch; Daniel Steven; Roland R Tilz; Dong-In Shin; K R Julian Chun; Heidi Estner; Felix Bourier; David Duncker; Philipp Sommer; Andreas Metzner; Tilman Maurer; Nils-Christian Ewertsen; Henning Jansen; Andreas Rillig; Victoria Johnson; Till Althoff
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2021-07-26

Review 2.  [Catheter ablation : Developments and technique selection].

Authors:  L Yahsaly; J Siebermair; R Wakili
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2022-02-18

3.  Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of high-power short-duration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Dibbendhu Khanra; Abdul Hamid; Saurabh Deshpande; Anindya Mukherjee; Sanjiv Petkar; Mohammad Saeed; Indranill Basu-Ray
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 4.  Efficiency, Safety, and Efficacy of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Xuerong Sun; Jiang Lu; Jinxuan Lin; Tianjie Feng; Ni Suo; Lihui Zheng; Zhimin Liu; Gang Chen; Xiaohan Fan; Shu Zhang; Guodong Niu
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.866

5.  The superiority of high-power short-duration radiofrequency catheter ablation strategy for atrial fibrillation treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Yoga Waranugraha; Ardian Rizal; Achmad J Firdaus; Fransiska A Sihotang; Akita R Akbar; Defyna D Lestari; Muhammad Firdaus; Akhmad I Nurudinulloh
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-07-02

Review 6.  Esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Takashi Kaneshiro; Yasuchika Takeishi
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-20

7.  Safety and Efficacy of High Power Shorter Duration Ablation Guided by Ablation Index or Lesion Size Index in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Chun Gui; Weiming Wen; Yan He; Weiran Dai; Guoqiang Zhong
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Comparison of high-power and conventional-power radiofrequency energy deliveries in pulmonary vein isolation using unipolar signal modification as a local endpoint.

Authors:  Koichiro Ejima; Satoshi Higuchi; Kyoichiro Yazaki; Shohei Kataoka; Daigo Yagishita; Miwa Kanai; Morio Shoda; Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-15

9.  Comparison of high-power short-duration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for treating atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao-Feng Chen; Jing Wu; Chao-Lun Jin; Mei-Jun Liu; Yi-Zhou Xu
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Procedural characteristics of pulmonary vein isolation with high-power short-duration setting compared to conventional setting.

Authors:  Naoko Hijioka; Takashi Kaneshiro; Takeshi Nehashi; Kazuaki Amami; Minoru Nodera; Shinya Yamada; Masashi Kamioka; Takafumi Ishida; Yasuchika Takeishi
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.