| Literature DB >> 35067224 |
Naoko Hijioka1, Takashi Kaneshiro2,3, Takeshi Nehashi1, Kazuaki Amami1, Minoru Nodera1, Shinya Yamada1, Masashi Kamioka1, Takafumi Ishida1, Yasuchika Takeishi1,4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of high-power short-duration (HP-SD) ablation compared to conventional ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).Entities:
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Dormant conduction; First pass isolation; High-power short-duration ablation; Pulmonary vein isolation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35067224 PMCID: PMC8785467 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02459-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1Patient flow diagram. After the exclusion criteria, the study patients were divided into two groups based on the used power setting. AF, atrial fibrillation; HP-SD, high-power short-duration; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation
Fig. 2Schematic diagram of separation of each pulmonary vein. PV was divided in six areas: the superior, carina, and inferior areas of each side of the PV. PV, pulmonary vein
Baseline characteristics of the study subjects
| Total (n = 158) | Conventional (n = 73) | HP-SD (n = 85) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, male, n (%) | 119 (75%) | 55 (75%) | 64 (75%) | 0.994 |
| Age, years | 62.9 ± 10.1 | 61.6 ± 11.1 | 64.1 ± 9.1 | 0.136 |
| Type of AF, paroxysmal | 99 (62%) | 46 (63%) | 53 (62%) | 0.932 |
| Body mass index | 24.6 ± 3.9 | 24.6 ± 3.7 | 24.5 ± 4.1 | 0.956 |
| BNP, pg/mL | 89.1 ± 125.4 | 85.4 ± 107.3 | 92.1 ± 138.9 | 0.742 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 63.9 ± 38.1 | 61.2 ± 12.3 | 66.2 ± 50.7 | 0.421 |
| LAD, mm | 40.8 ± 6.5 | 40.7 ± 6.6 | 40.9 ± 6.5 | 0.891 |
| LAVI, mL/m2 | 43.7 ± 16.4 | 42.4 ± 16.8 | 44.8 ± 16.0 | 0.415 |
| LVEF, % | 61.2 ± 9.7 | 61.4 ± 8.4 | 61.0 ± 10.7 | 0.793 |
AF, atrial fibrillation; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HP-SD, high-power short-duration; LAD, left atrial dimension; LAVI, left atrial volume index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction
Procedural results of right pulmonary vein isolation
| Conventional (n = 73) | HP-SD (n = 85) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| First pass isolation | 48 (65%) | 69 (81%) | 0.027 |
| Right superior PV | 16 (21%) | 4 (4%) | 0.001 |
| Right carina | 11 (15%) | 7 (8%) | 0.178 |
| Right inferior PV | 5 (6%) | 5 (5%) | 0.803 |
| Dormant conduction | 5 (6%) | 1 (1%) | 0.062 |
| Ablation time, min | 34.0 ± 31.7 | 12.0 ± 8.9 | < 0.001 |
HP-SD, high-power short-duration; PV, pulmonary vein
Procedural results of left pulmonary vein isolation
| Conventional (n = 73) | HP-SD (n = 85) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| First pass isolation | 59 (80%) | 71 (83%) | 0.657 |
| Left superior PV | 3 (4%) | 6 (7%) | 0.425 |
| Left carina | 6 (8%) | 7 (8%) | 0.997 |
| Left inferior PV | 6 (8%) | 1 (1%) | 0.032 |
| Dormant conduction | 4 (5%) | 4 (4%) | 0.823 |
| Ablation time, min | 25.7 ± 22.3 | 10.6 ± 3.6 | < 0.001 |
HP-SD, high-power short-duration; PV, pulmonary vein
Fig. 3Distribution of the remaining gaps after circumferential ablation in each PV. The remaining gaps after circumferential ablation were fewer in the right superior PV and the left inferior PV areas in the HP-SD group compared to the Conventional group. HP-SD, high-power short-duration; LPV, left pulmonary vein; RPV, right pulmonary vein
Fig. 4Distribution of the dormant conduction after PVI in each PV. The dormant conduction tended to be fewer in the HP-SD group than in the Conventional group in the RPV. HP-SD, high-power short-duration; LPV, left pulmonary vein; RPV, right pulmonary vein; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation
Fig. 5The Kaplan–Meier time-to-event curves for recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation. The patients in the Conventional group exhibited a higher recurrence rate than those in the HP-SD group. AF, atrial fibrillation; HP-SD, high-power short-duration