Literature DB >> 27207815

Five seconds of 50-60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation.

Abhishek Bhaskaran1,2, William Chik1,2, Jim Pouliopoulos1,2, Chrishan Nalliah1,2, Pierre Qian1,2, Tony Barry1,2,3, Fazlur Nadri1,2, Rahul Samanta1,2, Ying Tran4, Stuart Thomas1,2, Pramesh Kovoor1,2, Aravinda Thiagalingam1,2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Longer procedural time is associated with complications in radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation. We sought to reduce ablation time and thereby potentially reduce complications. The aim was to compare the dimensions and complications of 40 W/30 s setting to that of high-power ablations (50-80 W) for 5 s in the in vitro and in vivo models. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In vitro ablations-40 W/30 s were compared with 40-80 W powers for 5 s. In vivo ablations-40 W/30 s were compared with 50-80 W powers for 5 s. All in vivo ablations were performed with 10 g contact force and 30 mL/min irrigation rate. Steam pops and depth of lung lesions identified post-mortem were noted as complications. A total of 72 lesions on the non-trabeculated part of right atrium were performed in 10 Ovine. All in vitro ablations except for the 40 W/5 s setting achieved the critical lesion depth of 2 mm. For in vivo ablations, all lesions were transmural, and the lesion depths for the settings of 40 W/30 s, 50 W/5 s, 60 W/5 s, 70 W/5 s, and 80 W/5 s were 2.2 ± 0.5, 2.3 ± 0.5, 2.1 ± 0.4, 2.0 ± 0.3, and 2.3 ± 0.7 mm, respectively. The lesion depths of short-duration ablations were similar to that of the conventional ablation. Steam pops occurred in the ablation settings of 40 W/30 s and 80 W/5 s in 8 and 11% of ablations, respectively. Complications were absent in short-duration ablations of 50 and 60 W.
CONCLUSION: High-power, short-duration atrial ablation was as safe and effective as the conventional ablation. Compared with the conventional 40 W/30 s setting, 50 and 60 W ablation for 5 s achieved transmurality and had fewer complications. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation ablation; High power; Radiofrequency ablation; Safety; Short duration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27207815     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  29 in total

1.  Identification of Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Parameters That May Induce Intracardiac Steam Pops: Direct Visualization of Elicitation in Reanimated Swine Hearts.

Authors:  Tinen L Iles; Stephen G Quallich; Paul A Iaizzo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  The Impact of Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Devices on the Incidence and Prevention of Complications.

Authors:  Fehmi Keçe; Katja Zeppenfeld; Serge A Trines
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-08

3.  Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of high-power short-duration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Dibbendhu Khanra; Abdul Hamid; Saurabh Deshpande; Anindya Mukherjee; Sanjiv Petkar; Mohammad Saeed; Indranill Basu-Ray
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 4.  Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: current indications and evolving technologies.

Authors:  Ramanathan Parameswaran; Ahmed M Al-Kaisey; Jonathan M Kalman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Rationale and study design for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation guided by ablation index: a multi-center, prospective randomized trial (PAF-AI trial).

Authors:  Ruhong Jiang; Minglong Chen; Jie Fan; Fu Yi; Anli Tang; Xingpeng Liu; Wenqing Zhu; Shaowen Liu; Xiaobo Huang; Weizhu Ju; Xi Zhang; Jie Li; Jiangui He; Liang Shi; Genqing Zhou; Yuegang Wang; Chenyang Jiang
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study.

Authors:  Sergio Castrejón-Castrejón; Marcel Martínez Cossiani; Marta Ortega Molina; Carlos Escobar; Consuelo Froilán Torres; Nerea Gonzalo Bada; Marta Díaz de la Torre; José Manuel Suárez Parga; José Luis López Sendón; José Luis Merino
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Gains in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using a Standardized Workflow to Optimize Contact Force Technologies.

Authors:  Jose Osorio; Tina D Hunter; Rosemary S Bubien; Anil Rajendra; Joaquin Arciniegas; Gustavo Morales
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-12-31

8.  Lesion size and adjacent tissue damage assessment with high power and short duration radiofrequency ablation: comparison to conventional radiofrequency ablation power setting.

Authors:  Yoshinari Enomoto; Keijiro Nakamura; Rina Ishii; Yasutake Toyoda; Masako Asami; Takahito Takagi; Hikari Hashimoto; Hidehiko Hara; Kaoru Sugi; Masao Moroi; Masato Nakamura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 9.  Efficiency, Safety, and Efficacy of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Xuerong Sun; Jiang Lu; Jinxuan Lin; Tianjie Feng; Ni Suo; Lihui Zheng; Zhimin Liu; Gang Chen; Xiaohan Fan; Shu Zhang; Guodong Niu
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.866

10.  Safety and Efficacy of High Power Shorter Duration Ablation Guided by Ablation Index or Lesion Size Index in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Chun Gui; Weiming Wen; Yan He; Weiran Dai; Guoqiang Zhong
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.