| Literature DB >> 31712914 |
Atmitri Sisharmini1,2, Aniversari Apriana2, Nurul Khumaida1, Kurniawan Rudi Trijatmiko2, Bambang Sapta Purwoko3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rice can absorb less than 40% of applied nitrogen fertilizer, whereas the unabsorbed nitrogen fertilizer may cause environmental problems, such as algal blooms in freshwater and increased production of nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas which is 300 times more potent than carbon dioxide. Development of nitrogen use efficient (NUE) rice is essential for more environmentally friendly rice production. Recently, NUE rice has been developed by root-specific expression of alanine aminotransferase (AlaAT) gene from barley, a monocot plant. Therefore, we tested the efficacy of AlaAT gene from cucumber in transgenic rice, aiming to provide evidence for the conservation of AlaAT gene function in monocot and dicot.Entities:
Keywords: Alanine aminotransferase; Cucumber; Nitrogen use efficiency; Rice
Year: 2019 PMID: 31712914 PMCID: PMC6848643 DOI: 10.1186/s43141-019-0010-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Genet Eng Biotechnol ISSN: 1687-157X
Root and shoot characters of control and transgenic rice plants in MS medium containing 1/16 concentration of nitrogen
| Line | Root length (cm) | Shoot length (cm) | Wet biomass | Dry biomass | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root (g) | Shoot (g) | Root (g) | Shoot (g) | |||
| Control | 11.74 | 33.32 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.019 | 0.031 |
| FAM1 | 9.47 | 31.40 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.018 | 0.027 |
| FAM2 | 11.17 | 32,90 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.019 | 0.032 |
| FAM3 | 9.10 | 33.07 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.020 | 0.028 |
| FAM4 | 9.60 | 32.13 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.021 | 0.034 |
| FAM5 | 16.37* | 32.43 | 0.17** | 0.19 | 0.033* | 0.033 |
| FAM6 | 11.33 | 32.53 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.017 | 0.025 |
| FAM8 | 8.30 | 22.87 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.016 | 0.019 |
| FAM9 | 10.83 | 33.60 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.018 | 0.030 |
| FAM10 | 14.07 | 33.13 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.014 | 0.027 |
| FAM12 | 11.40 | 29.30 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.014 | 0.022 |
| FAM13 | 9.80 | 28.67 | 0.19** | 0.18 | 0.030* | 0.033 |
| FAM16 | 9.87 | 32 | 0.093 | 0.183 | 0.016 | 0.025 |
| FAM17 | 9.97 | 32.43 | 0.107 | 0.180 | 0.017 | 0.026 |
*Significantly higher than control at P < 0.05
**Significantly higher than control at P < 0.01
Fig. 1Development and molecular characterization of CsAlaAT2 transgenic rice event. a Schematic diagram of the T-DNA construct OsAnt1::CsAlaAT2, containing the CsAlaAT2 gene with the NOS terminator under the control of the OsAnt1 promoter. RB, right border; prOsAnt1, promoter antiquitin1; CsAlaAT2, Cucumis sativus Alanine aminotransferase; tNOS, terminator Nopaline synthase; pr 35 S, promoter 35 S; hpt, hygromycin phosphotransferase; C35S, cauliflower 35 S; LB, left border. b PCR amplification of cucumber AlaAT on T0 transgenic rice lines. M = 1 kb DNA ladder plus; 1–14 = transgenic lines, WT = wild type, P = plasmid control. c Southern blot analysis showing the copy number of hpt gene insertion in the T0 generation of transgenic lines. Hpt gene insertion is shown by white arrow. M = marker 1 kb ladder, WT = wild type, 1 = FAM3, 2 = FAM4, 3 = FAM5, 4 = FAM 9, 5 = FAM13, P = plasmid of pCAMBIA1301-CsAlaAT2
Yield parameters measured from greenhouse experiment of three CsAlaAT2 lead events and WT under three N fertilizer regimes
| N level | Genotype | RDW | SDW | RNC | SNC | TN | GY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N 0% | Control (WT) | 4.57e | 18.50f | 0.06 | 0.14c | 7.0bc | 30.59bc |
| FAM3 | 6.90bcd | 19.95def | 0.10 | 0.22bc | 8.3ab | 29.49bc | |
| FAM5 | 8.46ab | 23.13cdef | 0.12 | 0.34ab | 8.0abc | 29.11bc | |
| FAM13 | 5.33cde | 19.44ef | 0.06 | 0.23bc | 9.0a | 34.32abc | |
| N 50% | Control (WT) | 4.92de | 20.84cdef | 0.08 | 0.20bc | 6.3bc | 31.48bc |
| FAM3 | 7.49bc | 24.11bcd | 0.14 | 0.25bc | 8.3ab | 37.58ab | |
| FAM5 | 7.38bcd | 20.36cdef | 0.13 | 0.30abc | 8.7ab | 32.62abc | |
| FAM13 | 7.09bcd | 24.69bcd | 0.08 | 0.24abc | 9.0a | 40.28a | |
| N 100% | Control (WT) | 5.32cde | 24.51bcde | 0.09 | 0.18bc | 7.0bc | 30.55bc |
| FAM3 | 9.30ab | 34.83a | 0.13 | 0.42a | 8.3ab | 33.02abc | |
| FAM5 | 7.28bcd | 25.38bc | 0.09 | 0.27abc | 9.0a | 28.78c | |
| FAM13 | 10.13a | 29.27b | 0.12 | 0.23bc | 9.0a | 34.09abc | |
| N level (N) | * | ** | ns | ns | ns | * | |
| Genotype (G) | * | * | ns | * | ** | * | |
| N × G | * | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| CV (%) | 18.59 | 11.37 | 34.31 | 35.50 | 11.08 | 13.32 | |
Means with the same letter are not significantly different
*Significant at P < 0.05
**Significant at P < 0.01
Correlation among traits (all correlations shown are significant at P < 0.05)
| Trait | PH | TN | PL | GPP | RDW | SDW | RNC | SNC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TN | – | |||||||
| PL | – | – | ||||||
| GPP | – | – | – | |||||
| RDW | – | 0.356 | – | – | ||||
| SDW | – | – | – | – | 0.636** | |||
| RNC | – | – | – | – | 0.553** | 0.368 | ||
| SNC | – | – | – | – | 0.397 | 0.554** | ||
| GY | – | 0.449** | – | – | – | – | – | – |
** Significant at P < 0.001
Fig. 2Greenhouse experiment for evaluation of nitrogen use efficiency in transgenic events and wild type. a Root dry weight of three transgenic events and wild type at 3 N doses. b Shoot dry weight of three transgenic events and wild type at 3 N doses. c Tiller number of three transgenic events and wild type at 3 N doses. d Grain yield of three transgenic events and wild type at 3 N doses. Bars represent the means ± s.d. of three replicates. Means labeled with * indicate significant differences from WT at the corresponding N dose at P < 0.05
Fig. 3Performances of T1 transgenic rice events and WT at harvest stage at the low N condition in the greenhouse. A1 = shoot of event FAM13, A2 = shoot of wild type, B1 = root of event FAM13, B2 = root of wild type
Absorption, agronomic, and grain NUE values in CsAlaAT2 transgenic events
| Lines | Character | N fertilizer dosage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N 50% | N 100% | ||
| Wild type | Total biomass (gram/hill) | 25.76 ± 1.99 | 29.83 ± 1.19 |
| Grain yield/plant (gram/hill) | 31.48 ± 3.06 | 30.55 ± 6.18 | |
| N content in plant | 0.28 ± 0.1 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | |
| Absorption NUE | 0.284 | 0.14 | |
| Agronomical NUE | 25.76 | 14.91 | |
| Grain NUE | 31.48 | 15.28 | |
| FAM3 | Total biomass (gram/hill) | 31.6 ± 3.36 | 44.13 ± 1.36 |
| Grain yield/plant (gram/hill) | 37.58 ± 3.57 | 33.02 ± 5.23 | |
| N content in plant | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 0.56 ± 0.13 | |
| Absorption NUE | 0.386 | 0.28 | |
| Agronomical NUE | 31.60 | 22.06 | |
| Grain NUE | 37.60 | 16 | |
| Increase in N uptake efficiency (%)* | 34.48 | 107.4 | |
| Increase in grain yield (%)** | 19.40 | 8 | |
| FAM5 | Total Biomass (gram/hill) | 30.91 ± 0.88 | 37.74 ± 1.33 |
| Grain yield/plant (gram/hill) | 33.02 ± 3.42 | 30.63 ± 3.34 | |
| N content in plant | 0.43 ± 0.06 | 0.36 ± 0.12 | |
| Absorption NUE | 0.376 | 0.297 | |
| Agronomical NUE | 30.91 | 18.87 | |
| Grain NUE | 33 | 15.3 | |
| Increase in N uptake efficiency (%)* | 48.27 | 33.33 | |
| Increase in grain yield (%)** | 4.9 | 0.3 | |
| FAM13 | Total Biomass (gram/hill) | 31.78 ± 4 | 39.39 ± 1.45 |
| Grain yield/plant (gram/hill) | 40.28 ± 3.53 | 34.09 ± 3.00 | |
| N content in plant | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.07 | |
| Absorption NUE | 0.35 | 0.159 | |
| Agronomical NUE | 31.78 | 19.70 | |
| Grain NUE | 40.2 | 17 | |
| Increase in N uptake efficiency (%)* | 10.34 | 29.63 | |
| Increase in grain yield (%)** | 27.95 | 11.58 | |
*Increase in N uptake efficiency is calculated from the difference between the value of the N content of transgenic event and control (wild-type) divided by the value of N content of control line multiplied by 100%
**Increased in the grain yield is calculated from the difference between the results of grain yield/plant of transgenic lines to control (wild-type) divided by grain yield/plant of control line multiplied by 100%