Literature DB >> 3171219

Comparison of the effects of moist and dry conditions on dermal repair.

M Dyson1, S Young, C L Pendle, D F Webster, S M Lang.   

Abstract

The effects on dermal repair of moist conditions, achieved by covering excised wounds with the adhesive polyurethane dressing OPSITE, and dry conditions, achieved by exposure to air through dry gauze dressings, were compared in full thickness excised wounds on porcine skin during the period from 1 to 21 d after injury. Quantitative studies were made of changes in the populations of neutrophils, macrophages, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. The number of inflammatory phase cells (neutrophils and macrophages) decreased more rapidly under moist conditions than under dry conditions. There was also a more rapid increase in the number of proliferative phase cells (fibroblasts and endothelial cells) in the moist wounds; by 5 d after injury 66% of the cells of the granulation tissue of the moist wounds were of this type, compared with only 48% of the cells of equivalent areas of the dry wounds. By 21 d after injury the number of fibroblasts in the granulation tissue of the moist wounds had fallen below that in the dry wounds, suggesting that progress from the proliferative into the remodelling phase of repair was more rapid in the moist wounds. It was concluded that there was an acceleration of the inflammatory and proliferative phases of dermal repair in wounds healing under moist conditions when compared with those healing under dry conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3171219     DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12476467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN: 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


  23 in total

1.  Tissue reactions induced by hydrocolloid wound dressings.

Authors:  M D Leek; Y M Barlow
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Postoperative care of the facial laceration.

Authors:  Nicholas Medel; Neeraj Panchal; Edward Ellis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2010-12

Review 3.  Interactive wound dressings. A practical guide to their use in older patients.

Authors:  C Hansson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Macrophages restrain contraction of an in vitro wound healing model.

Authors:  P M Newton; J A Watson; R G Wolowacz; E J Wood
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.092

5.  Extending the limits of fingertip composite grafting with moist-exposed dressing.

Authors:  Daegu Son; Kihwan Han; David W Chang
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Wound management: the occlusive dressing.

Authors:  S B Rheinecker
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  Cellular mechanisms of skin repair in humans and other mammals.

Authors:  Laure Rittié
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.782

Review 8.  Early versus delayed dressing removal after primary closure of clean and clean-contaminated surgical wounds.

Authors:  Clare D Toon; Charnelle Lusuku; Rajarajan Ramamoorthy; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-03

Review 9.  Optimal treatment of venous (stasis) ulcers in elderly patients.

Authors:  C Hansson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Wound care management: proper protocol differs from athletic trainers' perceptions.

Authors:  M S Goldenberg
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.