Literature DB >> 1487446

Tissue reactions induced by hydrocolloid wound dressings.

M D Leek1, Y M Barlow.   

Abstract

Porcine full-thickness excisional wounds were treated with 4 different hydrocolloid (HCD) dressings--DuoDERM (ConvaTec/E. R. Squibb), Intrasite HCD (Smith and Nephew Medical), Tegasorb (3M) and Replicare (Smith and Nephew Medical). Animals were killed at 4, 10, 21 and 90 d post-wound, excision sites were fixed in formalin and processed for histological analysis. Granulomatous lesions were observed following treatment with each of the 4 HCD dressings. Such lesions developed between 4 and 10 d post-wound, exhibiting little evidence of resolution at 90 d post-wound. Of the 4 dressings examined, DuoDERM and Intrasite HCD precipitated the most severe reaction, each treatment resulting in granulomata with a distinct and different morphology. Treatment with DuoDERM resulted in granulomata characterised by a random distribution of dendritic cells, epithelioid cells, multinucleated giant cells, lymphocytes and plasma cells. In contrast, treatment with Intrasite HCD resulted in highly organised granulomata, consisting of a central focus of epithelioid cells surrounded by a peripheral cuff of macrophages, lymphocytes and plasma cells. This experimental study highlights chronic inflammatory lesions that may, if reflected in the clinical environment, question the efficacy and indication of HCD dressings in the treatment of wounds having a number of different aetiologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1487446      PMCID: PMC1259655     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  36 in total

1.  EFFECT OF AIR EXPOSURE AND OCCLUSION ON EXPERIMENTAL HUMAN SKIN WOUNDS.

Authors:  C D HINMAN; H MAIBACH
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-10-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Plasmacytoid monocytes (so-called plasmacytoid T cells) in granulomatous lymphadenitis.

Authors:  F Facchetti; C De Wolf-Peeters; R De Vos; J J van den Oord; K A Pulford; V J Desmet
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Comparison of the effects of semi-occlusive polyurethane dressings and hydrocolloid dressings on dermal repair: 1. Cellular changes.

Authors:  S R Young; M Dyson; R Hickman; S Lang; C Osborn
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 8.551

4.  Adverse effects on diabetic foot ulcers of highly adhesive hydrocolloid occlusive dressing.

Authors:  F Lithner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.

Authors:  A Alm; A M Hornmark; P A Fall; L Linder; B Bergstrand; M Ehrnebo; S M Madsen; G Setterberg
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh)       Date:  1989

6.  Antipsoriatic effect of semi-occlusive treatment--O2-consumption, blood flow and temperature measurements compared to clinical parameters.

Authors:  U Broby-Johansen; J K Kristensen
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.470

7.  Psoriasis therapy: comparative studies with a hydrocolloid dressing, plastic film occlusion, and triamcinolone acetonide cream.

Authors:  M David; N J Lowe
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.527

8.  Treatment of scleroderma skin ulcers with a hydrocolloid membrane.

Authors:  P B Milburn; J Z Singer; M A Milburn
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  The distribution of S100 and lysozyme immunoreactive cells in the various phases of granuloma development in sarcoidosis.

Authors:  B Veress; K Malmsköld
Journal:  Sarcoidosis       Date:  1987-03

10.  Treatment of donor sites--Duoderm or Omiderm?

Authors:  P Leicht; E Siim; B Sørensen
Journal:  Burns Incl Therm Inj       Date:  1989-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.