Literature DB >> 9342557

Interactive wound dressings. A practical guide to their use in older patients.

C Hansson1.   

Abstract

The properties of an ideal wound dressing do not change with the introduction of new types of wound dressing, but the range of effects on wound healing increases. The number of dressings available is enormous, and the choice between them is often bewildering. Because there is still no ideal dressing for all wound types, it is necessary to get to know a few well, and to avoid switching to new therapies solely on the basis of anecdotal reports. The adoption of novel dressings should be based on scientific evidence. At present, dressings are still chosen on the basis of local traditions and personal empirical experience, together with evidence from the few double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that have been performed. In the management of ulcers, a particular wound management plan should not be changed if the ulcer being treated is decreasing in size and the patient is comfortable. The dressing should be chosen with care. The type of chronic ulcer and its appearance, the amount of exudate and the presence or absence of pain all assist in the selection of an appropriate wound dressing product. Quality-of-life aspects are important. In the elderly, good quality of life may not necessarily require complete ulcer healing, although this is naturally desirable. Dressing changes should be minimised and the ulcer should be kept moist and the surrounding skin dry. The high cost of interactive dressings is a potential disadvantage of their use. However, if the wound can be re-dressed at longer intervals and if healing occurs more quickly, their use may be cost effective and associated with less pain and a better quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9342557     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-199711040-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  92 in total

1.  Safety and effect of transforming growth factor-beta(2) for treatment of venous stasis ulcers.

Authors:  M C Robson; L G Phillip; D M Cooper; W G Lyle; L E Robson; L Odom; D P Hill; A F Hanham; G A Ksander
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  1995 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 2.  Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings. A clinical review.

Authors:  G A Kannon; A B Garrett
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.398

Review 3.  Techniques of split-thickness skin grafting for lower extremity ulcerations.

Authors:  R S Kirsner; V Falanga
Journal:  J Dermatol Surg Oncol       Date:  1993-08

4.  Dry, moist, and wet skin wound repair.

Authors:  P M Vogt; C Andree; K Breuing; P Y Liu; J Slama; G Helo; E Eriksson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 5.  Wound therapy: growth factors as agents to promote healing.

Authors:  W Meyer-Ingold
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 19.536

6.  Contact dermatitis to Aloe arborescens.

Authors:  A Shoji
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Fibrin cuff lysis in chronic venous ulcers treated with a hydrocolloid dressing.

Authors:  G Mulder; R Jones; S Cederholm-Williams; G Cherry; T Ryan
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.736

8.  Microbiology and healing of the occluded skin-graft donor site.

Authors:  D J Smith; P D Thomson; L L Bolton; J J Hutchinson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Use of autografts for the treatment of leg ulcers in elderly patients.

Authors:  I R Harris; W Bottomley; E J Wood; W J Cunliffe
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.470

Review 10.  Alginates. A "new" dressing alternative.

Authors:  D Piacquadio; D B Nelson
Journal:  J Dermatol Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-11
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A dressing history.

Authors:  Douglas Queen; Heather Orsted; Hiromi Sanada; Geoff Sussman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Literature review on the management of diabetic foot ulcer.

Authors:  Leila Yazdanpanah; Morteza Nasiri; Sara Adarvishi
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-02-15

3.  Reducing Friction on Skin at Risk: The Use of 3M Cavilon No Sting Barrier Film.

Authors:  Stéphanie F Bernatchez; Golie E Mengistu; Bruce P Ekholm; Shilpi Sanghi; Steven D Theiss
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Nanomaterials for Wound Dressings: An Up-to-Date Overview.

Authors:  Alexandra Elena Stoica; Cristina Chircov; Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  Electrospun Nanofibers/Nanofibrous Scaffolds Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles as Effective Antibacterial Wound Dressing Materials.

Authors:  Sibusiso Alven; Buhle Buyana; Zizo Feketshane; Blessing Atim Aderibigbe
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 6.321

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.