Literature DB >> 31708295

Randomized Study of Systematic Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted and Systematic Biopsy in Men on Active Surveillance (ASIST): 2-year Postbiopsy Follow-up.

Laurence Klotz1, Greg Pond2, Andrew Loblaw3, Linda Sugar4, Madeline Moussa5, David Berman6, Theo Van der Kwast7, Danny Vesprini3, Laurent Milot4, Marlene Kebabdjian4, Neil Fleshner8, Sangheet Ghai8, Joseph Chin5, Masoom Haider4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The initial report from the ASIST trial showed little benefit from targeted biopsy for men on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. Data after 2-yr follow-up are now available for analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if there was a difference in the AS failure rate in a 2-yr follow-up period among men undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before initial confirmatory biopsy (CBx) compared to those who did not. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is the 2-yr post-CBx follow-up for the ASIST trial, a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study for men with Gleason grade group (GG) 1 cancer eligible for AS. Patients were randomized to CBx with 12-core systematic sampling or MRI with systematic and targeted sampling. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Patients with GG ≤ 1 on CBx were followed for 2 yr and had MRI and biopsy at that time point. Patients failed AS if they were no longer under AS because of grade progression, clinical progression, subject choice, clinical judgment, treatment, or lost to follow-up. Clinically significant cancer (CSC) was defined as GG ≥ 2. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 259 men underwent CBx, 132 in the non-MRI and 127 in the MRI arm. After biopsy, 101 men in the non-MRI arm (76%) and 98 in the MRI arm (77%) continued AS. There were fewer men with AS failures in the MRI (19/98, 19%) compared to the non-MRI group (35/101, 35%; p =  0.017). At 2-yr biopsy there were fewer men with CSC in the MRI arm (9.9%, 8/81) than in the non-MRI arm (23%, 17/75; p =  0.048). Significant differences in AS failure rates were detected across the three centers in the MRI arm only (4.2% [2/48] vs 17% [4/24] vs 27% [7/26]; p =  0.019).
CONCLUSIONS: Baseline MRI before CBx during AS results in 50% fewer AS failures and less grade progression over 2 yr. The center where MRI and targeted biopsy is performed may influence AS failure rates. PATIENT
SUMMARY: The ASIST trial randomized 273 men on active surveillance with low-grade prostate cancer diagnosed within the last year to systematic biopsy or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with systematic and targeted biopsy. The initial report showed little benefit from targeted biopsy. However, after 2 yr of follow-up we found that baseline MRI before confirmatory biopsy resulted in 50% fewer failures of surveillance and less progression to higher-grade cancer. This confirms the value of MRI in men on surveillance. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01354171).
Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; MRI; Prostate cancer; Randomized prospective trial; Systematic biopsy; Targeted Biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31708295     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  32 in total

1.  Role of MRI for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard C Wu; Amir H Lebastchi; Boris A Hadaschik; Mark Emberton; Caroline Moore; Pilar Laguna; Jurgen J Fütterer; Arvin K George
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Localised prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy or deferred treatment strategy].

Authors:  Angelika Borkowetz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Current Role of Multiparametric MRI and MRI Targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Germany: A Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Matthias Saar; Johannes Linxweiler; Angelika Borkowetz; Sebastian Fussek; Katerina Urbanova; Laura Bellut; Glen Kristiansen; Bernd Wullich
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Combined MRI-targeted Plus Systematic Confirmatory Biopsy Improves Risk Stratification for Patients Enrolling on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Luke P O'Connor; Alex Z Wang; Nitin K Yerram; Amir H Lebastchi; Michael Ahdoot; Sandeep Gurram; Johnathan Zeng; Sherif Mehralivand; Stephanie Harmon; Maria J Merino; Howard L Parnes; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Contemporary Selection Criteria in Prostate Cancer Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Yelin Mulati; Lingyun Zhai; Yuke Chen; Yu Wang; Juefei Feng; Wei Yu; Qian Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  The role of diagnostic ultrasound imaging for patients with known prostate cancer within an active surveillance pathway: A systematic review.

Authors:  Pamela Parker; Maureen Twiddy; Paul Whybrow; Alan Rigby; Matthew Simms
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-04-15

7.  The effect of capped biparametric magnetic resonance imaging slots on weekly prostate cancer imaging workload.

Authors:  Nikita Sushentsev; Iztok Caglic; Evis Sala; Nadeem Shaida; Rhys A Slough; Bruno Carmo; Vasily Kozlov; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; Tristan Barrett
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance.

Authors:  James L Liu; Hiten D Patel; Nora M Haney; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Histological findings of totally embedded robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) specimens in 1197 men with a negative (low risk) preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) prostate lobe and clinical implications.

Authors:  William John Yaxley; François-Xavier Nouhaud; Sheliyan Raveenthiran; Anthony Franklin; Peter Donato; Geoff Coughlin; Boon Kua; Troy Gianduzzo; David Wong; Robert Parkinson; Nicholas Brown; Hemamali Samaratunga; Brett Delahunt; Lars Egevad; Matthew Roberts; John William Yaxley
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 10.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela K Shill; Monique J Roobol; Behfar Ehdaie; Andrew J Vickers; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.