Literature DB >> 28409863

The influence of SNP-based chromosomal microarray and NIPT on the diagnostic yield in 10,000 fetuses with and without fetal ultrasound anomalies.

Malgorzata I Srebniak1, Maarten F C M Knapen2,3, Marike Polak4, Marieke Joosten1, Karin E M Diderich1, Lutgarde C P Govaerts1, Marjan Boter1, Joan N R Kromosoeto1, Daniella Aloysia C M van Hassel1, Gido Huijbregts1, Wilfred F J van IJcken5, Roger Heydanus6, Anneke Dijkman7, Toon Toolenaar8, Femke A T de Vries1, Jeroen Knijnenburg1, Attie T J I Go2, Robert-Jan H Galjaard1, Diane Van Opstal1.   

Abstract

Prenatal diagnostics has been impacted by technological changes in the past decade, which have affected the diagnostic yield. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of SNP array and noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) on the diagnostic yield and the number of invasive tests in our center. The frequency of pathogenic fetal unbalanced chromosome aberrations was studied in 10,005 cases referred for prenatal testing in 2009-2015. Chromosomal SNP microarray analysis replaced karyotyping in all invasively tested pregnancies and since 2014 a choice between NIPT and diagnostic testing with microarray was offered to women with an increased risk for common aneuploidy. The introduction of microarray led to an additional yield of submicroscopic pathogenic chromosome aberrations: 3.6% in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies and 1.9% in fetuses without ultrasound anomalies. The introduction of NIPT led to a decrease of invasive tests and of diagnostic yield. Moreover, a diagnostic delay in about 1:350 cases was observed. Since 20%-33% of pathogenic fetal chromosome aberrations are different from the common aneuploidies and triploidy, whole-genome analysis should be offered after invasive sampling. Because NIPT (as a second screening) has led to a decreased diagnostic yield, it should be accompanied by an appropriate pretest counseling.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NIPT; SNP array; diagnostic yield; first trimester screening; microarray testing; noninvasive prenatal testing; prenatal diagnosis; ultrasound anomalies

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28409863     DOI: 10.1002/humu.23232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  9 in total

1.  TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Karuna R M van der Meij; Erik A Sistermans; Merryn V E Macville; Servi J C Stevens; Caroline J Bax; Mireille N Bekker; Caterina M Bilardo; Elles M J Boon; Marjan Boter; Karin E M Diderich; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Leonie K Duin; Brigitte H W Faas; Ilse Feenstra; Monique C Haak; Mariëtte J V Hoffer; Nicolette S den Hollander; Iris H I M Hollink; Fernanda S Jehee; Maarten F C M Knapen; Angelique J A Kooper; Irene M van Langen; Klaske D Lichtenbelt; Ingeborg H Linskens; Merel C van Maarle; Dick Oepkes; Mijntje J Pieters; G Heleen Schuring-Blom; Esther Sikkel; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Dominique F C M Smeets; Malgorzata I Srebniak; Ron F Suijkerbuijk; Gita M Tan-Sindhunata; A Jeanine E M van der Ven; Shama L van Zelderen-Bhola; Lidewij Henneman; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal; Marjan M Weiss
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Array study in fetuses with nuchal translucency above the 95th percentile: a 4-year observational single-centre study.

Authors:  Edgar Coello-Cahuao; María Ángeles Sánchez-Durán; Inés Calero; María Teresa Higueras; Mayte Avilés García; Carlota Rodó; Nerea Maiz; Alberto Plaja Rustein; Neus Castells-Sarret; Carmen Mediano-Vizuete; Elena Carreras
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Rapid preimplantation genetic screening using a handheld, nanopore-based DNA sequencer.

Authors:  Shan Wei; Zachary R Weiss; Pallavi Gaur; Eric Forman; Zev Williams
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review.

Authors:  Olav B Petersen; Eric Smith; Diane Van Opstal; Marike Polak; Maarten F C M Knapen; Karin E M Diderich; Caterina M Bilardo; Lidia R Arends; Ida Vogel; Malgorzata I Srebniak
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  How to deal with uncertainty in prenatal genomics: A systematic review of guidelines and policies.

Authors:  Jasmijn E Klapwijk; Malgorzata I Srebniak; Attie T J I Go; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Celine Lewis; Jennifer Hammond; Melissa Hill; Stina Lou; Ida Vogel; Kelly E Ormond; Karin E M Diderich; Hennie T Brüggenwirth; Sam R Riedijk
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.296

6.  Reliable detection of subchromosomal deletions and duplications using cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Liesbeth Vossaert; Qun Wang; Roseen Salman; Xinming Zhuo; Chunjing Qu; David Henke; Ron Seubert; Jennifer Chow; Lance U'ren; Brennan Enright; Jackie Stilwell; Eric Kaldjian; Yaping Yang; Chad Shaw; Brynn Levy; Ronald Wapner; Amy Breman; Ignatia Van den Veyver; Arthur Beaudet
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Social and medical need for whole genome high resolution NIPT.

Authors:  Malgorzata I Srebniak; Maarten F C M Knapen; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marike Polak; Marieke Joosten; Karin E M Diderich; Laura J C M van Zutven; Krista A K E Prinsen; Sam Riedijk; Attie T J I Go; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Lies H Hoefsloot; Diane Van Opstal
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.183

8.  Analyzing false-negative results detected in low-risk non-invasive prenatal screening cases.

Authors:  Ying Lin; Dong Liang; Yan Wang; Hang Li; An Liu; Ping Hu; Zhengfeng Xu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.183

Review 9.  Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gioia Mastromoro; Daniele Guadagnolo; Nader Khaleghi Hashemian; Enrica Marchionni; Alice Traversa; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.