Literature DB >> 31705596

P-P Condensation and P-N/P-P Bond Metathesis: Facile Synthesis of Cationic Tri- and Tetraphosphanes.

Clemens Taube1, Kai Schwedtmann1, Medena Noikham2, Ekasith Somsook2, Felix Hennersdorf1, Robert Wolf3, Jan J Weigand1.   

Abstract

[LC R P((PhP)2 C2 H4 )][OTf] (4 a,b[OTf]) and [LC iPr P(PPh2 )2 ][OTf] (5 b[OTf]) were prepared from the reaction of imidazoliumyl-substituted dipyrazolylphosphane triflate salts [LC R P(pyr)2 ][OTf] (3 a,b[OTf]; a: R=Me, b=iPr; LC R =1,3-dialkyl-4,5-dimethylimidazol-2-yl; pyr=3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl) with the secondary pan class="Chemical">phosphanes PhP(H)C2 H4 P(H)Ph) and Ph2 PH. A stepwise double P-N/P-P bond metathesis to catena-tetraphosphane-2,3-diium triflate salt [(Ph2 P)2 (LC Me P)2 ][OTf]2 (7 a[OTf]2 ) is observed when reacting 3 a[OTf] with diphosphane P2 Ph4 . The coordination ability of 5 b[OTf] was probed with selected coinage metal salts [Cu(CH3 CN)4 ]OTf, AgOTf and AuCl(tht) (tht=tetrahydrothiophene). For AuCl(tht), the helical complex [{(Ph2 PPLC iPr )Au}4 ][OTf]4 (9[OTf]4 ) was unexpectedly formed as a result of a chloride-induced P-P bond cleavage. The weakly coordinating triflate anion enables the formation of the expected copper(I) and silver(I) complexes [(5 b)M(CH3 CN)3 ][OTf]2 (M=Cu, Ag) (10[OTf]2 , 11[OTf]2 ).
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P−P bond metathesis; cationic polyphosphanes; gold complex; phosphorus ligands; reductive coupling

Year:  2019        PMID: 31705596      PMCID: PMC7065231          DOI: 10.1002/anie.201911483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN: 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


Introduction

Next to carbon, phosphorus has the strongest tendency to form homoatomic frameworks.1 As shown by the pioneering work of Baudler,2 von Schnering,3 Krossing,4 and numerous other groups, this has resulted in a large variety of neutral, anionic, and cationic polyphosphanes.5 Synthetic methods for the preparation of polyphosphanes from P1 sources are typically based on salt metathesis of a halophosphane with a metal phosphide,2, 6 the reaction of chlorophosphanes with silyl‐ or stannylphosphanes,7 or the reduction of a halophosphane with alkali metals.8 Nevertheless, the established routes towards neutral polyphosphanes are often plagued by poor selectivity and low yields.9 Alkyl chain analogous catena‐phosphanes consisting of tricoordinated phosphorus atoms are mostly restricted to neutral triphosphanes10 and tetraphosphanes.11 Phosphanyl phosphonium ions are related cationic derivatives, but comprise tetracoordinate phosphorus atoms,12 while onio‐substituted polyphosphanes are still elusive. In this regard, we developed a selective, high‐yielding synthetic strategy based on pyrazolyl‐substituted phosphanes such as 1 as readily accessible P1 units (Scheme 1).13 Pyrazolyl substituents are excellent leaving groups, which enable clean condensation reactions with primary and secondary phosphanes for the construction of P−P bonds.14 Previous examples gave rise to diverse structural motifs such as triphosphanes and iso‐tetraphosphanes (Scheme 1, I).15 Larger frameworks, such as hexaphosphanes, are accessible through the concept of P−N/P−P bond metathesis (Scheme 1, II).16 This concept allows for a cross exchange of bonding partners similar to olefin metathesis17 in the reaction of a pyrazolyl‐substituted phosphane featuring a P−N bond with a diphosphane featuring a P−P bond. In such a reaction, the total number of P−N and P−P bonds remains constant (Scheme 1, black box).16
Scheme 1

Condensation and P−N/P−P metathesis reactions for P−P bond formation reactions to access neutral (previous work; I‐II) and cationic (this work; III‐IV) polyphosphanes from pyrazolyl‐substituted P1 units such as 1 and 3 a,b[OTf] (LC=1,3‐dialkyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐yl; a: R=Me; b: R=iPr; pyr=3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl).

Condensation and P−N/PP metathesis reactions for PP bond formation reactions to access neutral (previous work; I‐II) and cationic (this work; III‐IV) pan class="Chemical">polyphosphanes from pyrazolyl‐substituted P1 units such as 1 and 3 a,b[OTf] (LC=1,3‐dialkyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐yl; a: R=Me; b: R=iPr; pyr=3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl). Polyphosphorus cations stabilized by imidazoliumyl substituents are very scarce, and we envisioned the use of our recently developed P−N/P−P bond metathesis strategy for their formation. The exchange of one pyrazolyl substituent (pyr=3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl) in tripyrazolylphosphane Ppyr3 (1) with the imidazoliumyl substituent LC R (LC R=1,3‐dialkyl‐4,5‐dimethyl‐imidazol‐2‐yl; a: R=Me; b: R=iPr) gives triflate salts [LC RPpyr2][OTf] (3 a,b[OTf]). Since imidazoliumyl substituents such as LC R are known to stabilize unusual bonding motifs at the directly bonded P atom,18 we were keen to explore the synthetic potential of these readily accessible P1 building blocks. Herein, we describe the facile synthesis of cationic triphosphorus (4 a,b[OTf], 5 b[OTf]) and tetraphosphorus (7 a[OTf]2) compounds via the condensation of dipyrazolylphosphanes 3 a,b[OTf] with secondary phosphanes and via a stepwise P−N/P−P bond metathesis in the reaction of 3 a[OTf] with P2Ph4. A detailed NMR spectroscopic investigation provides mechanistic insight into the unusual P−N/P−P bond metathesis reaction. By investigating the coordination properties of 5 b[OTf] in the reaction with AuCl(tht) (tht=tetrahydrothiophene), we discovered a tetranuclear gold complex (9[OTf]4) that is formed as a result of a chloride induced P−P bond cleavage of 5 b[OTf]. The critical mechanistic role of nucleophilic chloride ions is underlined by the synthesis of copper(I) and silver(I) complexes 10[OTf]2 and 11[OTf]2, which contain intact triphosphane units 5 b +.

Results and Discussion

The synthesis of dipyrazolylphosphane salts 3 a,b[OTf] follows our established procedure for the synthesis of 1,19 which is conveniently adapted to the condensation of the dichlorophosphane salts 2 a,b[OTf]20 with two equiv of 3,5‐dimethyl‐1‐(trimethylsilyl)‐1H‐pyrazole (pyrSiMe3) under release of two equiv Me3SiCl (Scheme 2). The addition of n‐hexane to the reaction mixture leads to the precipitation of analytically pure, colorless salts 3 a[OTf] (96 % yield) and 3 b[OTf] (88 % yield).21 The 31P{1H} NMR resonances of 3 a,b[OTf] in CD2Cl2 (3 a[OTf]: δ(P)=36.9 ppm; 3 b[OTf]: δ(P)=41.5 ppm) are significantly high‐field shifted compared to 2 a,b[OTf] (2 a[OTf]: δ(P)=107.8 ppm; 2 b[OTf]: δ(P)=109.1 ppm).20b, 21 The molecular structures of the cations are confirmed by X‐ray diffraction analyses (3 a[OTf]: Figure S1, 3 b[OTf]: Figure 1),21 which show the expected pyramidal bonding environment at the P atom and typical P−N bond lengths ranging from 1.7055(13) to 1.7334(11) Å (cf. 1: 1.714(4) Å).22
Scheme 2

Synthesis of 3 a,b[OTf] and 4 a,b[OTf]; i)+2 pyrSiMe3; −2 Me3SiCl, C6H5F for 3 a[OTf] and CH2Cl2 for 3 b[OTf], r.t., 16 h, 3 a[OTf]: 96 %, 3 b[OTf]: 88 %; ii)+PhP(H)C2H4P(H)Ph, −2 pyrH, C6H5F, r.t., 16 h; 4 a[OTf]: 72 %, 4 b[OTf]: 85 %.

Figure 1

Molecular structure of cations 3 b +, 4 b +, and 5 b + of the respective triflate salts;33 hydrogen atoms, solvate molecules, and anions are omitted for clarity and ellipsoids are set at 50 % probability; selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°]: 3 b +: P1–N1 1.7334(11), P1–N2 1.7007(11), N5‐P1‐N3 102.51(5); 4 b +: P1–P2 2.2248(11), P2–P3 2.2181(11), P1‐P2‐P3 98.37(4) 5 b +: P1–P2 2.2222(5), P1–P3 2.2311(5), P2‐P1‐P3 106.539(19).

Molecular structure of cations 3 b +, 4 b +, and 5 b + of the respective pan class="Chemical">triflate salts;33 pan class="Chemical">hydrogen atoms, solvate molecules, and anions are omitted for clarity and ellipsoids are set at 50 % probability; selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°]: 3 b +: P1–N1 1.7334(11), P1–N2 1.7007(11), N5‐P1‐N3 102.51(5); 4 b +: P1–P2 2.2248(11), P2–P3 2.2181(11), P1‐P2‐P3 98.37(4) 5 b +: P1–P2 2.2222(5), P1–P3 2.2311(5), P2‐P1‐P3 106.539(19). Synthesis of 3 a,b[OTf] and 4 a,b[OTf]; i)+2 pyrSiMe3; −2 Me3SiCl, pan class="Chemical">C6H5F for 3 a[OTf] and CH2Cl2 for 3 b[OTf], r.t., 16 h, 3 a[OTf]: 96 %, 3 b[OTf]: 88 %; ii)+PhP(H)C2H4P(H)Ph, −2 pyrH, C6H5F, r.t., 16 h; 4 a[OTf]: 72 %, 4 b[OTf]: 85 %. The PP condensation reaction of 3 a,b[OTf] (Scheme 2) proceeds cleanly with racemic 1,2‐bis(phenylphosphanyl)ethane (PhP(H)C2H4P(H)Ph, one equiv.) to give 1,2,3‐triphospholanium salts 4 a,b[OTf] under release of 3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole (pyrH). After work‐up, both compounds can be isolated in 72 % and 85 % yield, respectively. Suitable crystals for X‐ray diffraction analyses were obtained by slow diffusion of n‐hexane into a saturated CH2Cl2 solution of 4 a[OTf] and by diffusion of Et2O into a CH3CN solution of 4 b[OTf] at −30 °C.21 The molecular structures are shown in the Supporting Information, Figure S2 for 4 a[OTf] and in Figure 1 for 4 b[OTf]. Similar to related 1,2,3‐triphospholane derivatives,16, 23 both cations show an envelope conformation of the five‐membered ring in the solid state in which the phenyl and the imidazoliumyl substituents adopt an all‐trans configuration. The P−P bond lengths range from 2.2156(4) to 2.2291(4) Å and are comparable to other structurally related 1,2,3‐triphospholanes.24 The P1‐P2‐P3 angles with a value of 98.261(16)° for 4 a[OTf] and 101.83(4) for 4 b[OTf] are more acute compared to acyclic derivatives. The 31P NMR spectrum of 4 a[OTf] reveals at room temperature two sharp resonances of an AX2 spin system (4 a[OTf]: δ(PA)=−47.4 ppm, δ(PX)=5.5 ppm; 1 J(PAPX)=−219 Hz), while the resonances are broadened in case of 4 b[OTf] owing to dynamic behavior attributed to the presence of two conformational isomers which are in exchange.25, 26 A detailed discussion is given in the Supporting Information.21 The related reaction of 3 a,b[OTf] with diphenylphosphane to form triphosphanes 5 a,b[OTf] is less selective (Scheme 3, I). The 31P NMR spectrum of a 1:2 reaction mixture of 3 a[OTf] and Ph2PH (Figure S6)21 reveals the formation of several compounds, where 5 a[OTf] is only the minor product (δ(PA)=−57.1 ppm, δ(PX)=−22.4 ppm; 1 J(PAPX)=−157 Hz). The 31P NMR spectrum of the crude reaction mixture additionally shows the presence of cation LC MeP(H)PPh2 (6 a: δ(PA)=−52.4 ppm, δ(PX)=−17.8 ppm, 1 J(PAPX)=−158 Hz, 1 J PH=−230 Hz), pyrPPh2 (δ(P)=39.3 ppm), pyrH, P2Ph4 (δ(P)=−15.3 ppm) and catena‐tetraphosphane 7 a[OTf]2 (see below). Cations 5 a and 6 a are the result of a stepwise condensation of 3 a[OTf] and Ph2PH (Scheme 3, I) accompanied by the formation of 1,3‐(dimethylpyrazolyl)diphenylphosphane (pyrPPh2) and 3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole (pyrH). Diphosphane P2Ph4 is the condensation product of Ph2PH and pyrPPh2 (Scheme 3, II). Catena‐tetraphosphane‐2,3‐diium triflate 7 a[OTf]2 can be isolated in 29 % yield by filtration of the reaction mixture and washing with C6H5F.
Scheme 3

I) Reaction of 3 a[OTf] with Ph2PH giving catena‐tetraphosphane 7 a[OTf]2 along with P2Ph4 and intermediates 5 a + and 6 a + (gray); i) C6H5F, 45 min; II) formation of 3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole (pyrH) and diphosphane (P2Ph4) from the reaction of sec. phosphane (HPPh2) and the pyrazolylphosphane pyrPPh2; III) ii) C6H5F, 3 d; formation of 7 a[OTf]2 from the reaction of 3 a[OTf] with P2Ph4 and intermediates 8 a + and 5 a + (gray).

I) Reaction of 3 a[OTf] with Ph2PH giving catena‐tetraphosphane 7 a[OTf]2 along with P2Ph4 and intermediates 5 a + and 6 a + (gray); i) C6H5F, 45 min; II) formation of 3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole (pyrH) and diphosphane (P2Ph4) from the reaction of sec. phosphane (HPPh2) and the pyrazolylphosphane pyrPPh2; III) ii) C6H5F, 3 d; formation of 7 a[OTf]2 from the reaction of 3 a[OTf] with P2Ph4 and intermediates 8 a + and 5 a + (gray). The formation of P2Ph4 in the aforementioned reaction prompted us to investigate its reaction with 3 a[OTf] in a 2:3 ratio as we envisioned a P−N/P−P bond metathesis for the formation of 7 a 2+. Indeed, 7 a[OTf]2 is formed selectively in this reaction in C6H5F, where the triflate salt of 7 a 2+ precipitates as analytically pure, colorless material in a much higher yield (77 %) over the course of three days. Mechanistically, this reaction involves a twofold P−N/P−P bond metathesis. In the first step, 3 a + reacts with P2Ph4 to give 8 a + and 5 a + under concomitant formation of pyrPPh2 (Scheme 3, III), which is confirmed by 31P NMR investigations of the reaction mixture showing 8 a + (AX spin system, δ(PA)=−23.6 ppm, δ(PX)=34.1 ppm, 1 J(PAPX)=−221 Hz) and 5 a + as intermediates (Supporting Information, Figure S4).21 In the second step, 8 a + and 5 a + undergo a further P−N/P−P bond metathesis reaction, which ultimately gives 7 a 2+ via the release of another equivalent of pyrPPh2 (Scheme 3, III). Dication 7 a 2+ gives rise to an AA′XX′ spin system in the 31P NMR spectrum with resonances at δ(PA)=−66.5 ppm and δ(PX)=−22.6 ppm (1 J(PAPA′)=−132 Hz, 1 J(PAPX)=−138 Hz, 2 J(PAPX′)=80 Hz and 3 J(PXPX′)=−7 Hz; Supporting Information, Figure S5; detailed 31P NMR parameters are included in Table S1).21 The molecular structure of 7 a 2+ reveals a catena‐P4 structural motif with two imidazoliumyl substituents LC Me bound to the pan class="Disease">inner P atoms (Figure 2). In the solid state, 7 a 2+ adopts a meso‐configuration. The rac‐isomer is likely energetically unfavorable due to the steric bulk of the imidazoliumyl substituents. The three P−P bond lengths are nearly equal (2.2364(5) Å, 2.2345(6) Å and 2.2397(5) Å) and compare well to the similar P−P bonds in comparable acyclic compounds.12, 27
Figure 2

Molecular structure of 7 a in 7 a[OTf]2;33 hydrogen atoms, solvate molecules, and anions are omitted for clarity and ellipsoids are set at 50 % probability; selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°]: P1–P2 2.2364(5), P2–P3 2.2345(6), P3–P4 2.2397(5), P1‐P2‐P3 94.33(2), P2‐P3‐P4 99.47(2).

Molecular structure of 7 a in 7 a[OTf]2;33 pan class="Chemical">hydrogen atoms, solvate molecules, and anions are omitted for clarity and ellipsoids are set at 50 % probability; selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°]: P1–P2 2.2364(5), P2–P3 2.2345(6), P3–P4 2.2397(5), P1‐P2‐P3 94.33(2), P2‐P3‐P4 99.47(2). When the analogous condensation reaction is performed with compound 3 b[OTf] and pan class="Chemical">Ph2PH, the related dication 7 b 2+ is not formed and an equilibrium mixture of cations 5 b +, 6 b +, and 8 b + is observed (Scheme 4). It appears that the increased steric requirement of the iPr group in 3 b + prevents the formation of the P4 chain from the condensation reaction of 6 b + and 8 b +.
Scheme 4

Synthesis of triphosphane 5 b[OTf]; i) −pyrH, CH3CN, r.t., 16 h, then +Ph2Ppyr, −pyrH, THF, r.t., 16 h; 5 b[OTf], yield (NMR): 52 %, yield (isolated): 21 %.

Synthesis of triphosphane 5 b[OTf]; i) −pyrH, CH3CN, r.t., 16 h, then +Ph2Ppyr, −pyrH, THF, r.t., 16 h; 5 b[OTf], yield (NMR): 52 %, yield (isolated): 21 %. Triphosphane 5 b[OTf] can be isolated in a significantly higher yield when the reaction is performed stepwise. First, 3 b[OTf] (one equiv.) is reacted with Ph2PH (2 equiv.), resulting in a mixture of 5 b[OTf] (δ(PA)=−55.8, δ(PX)=−19.1, 1 J(PAPX)=−154 Hz) and 6 b[OTf] (δ(PA)=−108.7 ppm, δ(PX)=−23.5 ppm, 1 J(PAPX)=141 Hz), which can be detected by 31P NMR spectroscopy (Supporting Information, Figure S8). In the second step, pyrPPh2 (0.7 equiv) is added. In this case, 5 b[OTf] can be obtained as crystalline crude material of 70 % purity. Nevertheless, the compound can be isolated as a pure material in 21 % yield after several recrystallization steps. Attempts to selectively synthesize 5 b[OTf] via dehalosilylation7a, 7b or salt metathesis2 from the dichlorophosphane 2 b[OTf] were unsuccessful which underlines the advantageous use of pyrazolylphosphanes.21 X‐ray‐quality crystals are obtained by slow diffusion of Et2O into a saturated THF solution of 5 b[OTf] at −30 °C (Figure 1). The P−P bond lengths of 2.2222(5) Å and 2.2311(5) Å compare well to those in comparable acyclic compounds.12, 27 Realizing that the synthesized oligo‐phosphorus compounds should have considerable potential as multidentate ligands, we explored their coordination chemistry towards gold(I) chloride. The reactions of 7 a[OTf]2 and 4 b[OTf] with AuCl(tht) turned out to be rather unselective and result in complex mixtures of several products of currently unknown constitution.21 However, the addition of one equivalent of AuCl(tht) to a solution of 5 b[OTf] in THF (Scheme 5) led to the formation of a pale yellow precipitate. The 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of the filtrate shows one sharp resonance which is assigned to Ph2PCl (δ(P)=82.5 ppm; Supporting Information, Figure S15).21 The 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of the solid material dissolved in CD3CN shows a highly symmetric, higher order spin system which can be attributed to the helical cationic tetragold complex [{(Ph2PPLC iPr)Au}4][OTf]4 (9[OTf]4). The two major resonances are at δ(PA)=−86.6 ppm and δ(PX)=29.0 ppm next to additional signals which we attribute to the presence of a minor diastereomer (Supporting Information, Figure S16).21 Upon cooling to 235 K, the resonances of this minor diastereomer vanish which allowed iterative fitting of the spectrum to an AA′A′′A′′′XX′X′′X′′′ spin system (Figure 3, left; see the Supporting Information, Table S2 for further details).21 The A part of the spin system is assigned to the phosphorus atoms carrying the imidazoliumyl substituents and the X part to the Ph2P moiety. The resonances of the ligand are significantly high‐field shifted with a much larger 1 J(PAPX) coupling constant of −328 Hz compared to related free diphosphanide compounds (compare (cAAC)P−PPh2, cAAC=cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene δ(PA)=−27.3 ppm and δ(PX)=41.2 ppm, 1 J(PAPX)=−242 Hz),28 which is caused by Au coordination. The unusually large 4 J(PAPA′′) coupling constant of 314 Hz indicates a through space coupling path as a result of the orientation of the electron pairs of the imidazoliumyl‐substituted phosphorus atoms.29
Scheme 5

Reaction of 5 b[OTf] with AuCl(tht); i) THF, r.t., 1 h; 9[OTf]4: 85 %.

Figure 3

Left: 31P{H} NMR spectrum of 9 4+ (CD3CN, 235 K); insets show the zoom in of the experimental (upwards) and the iteratively fitted (downwards) AA′A′′A′′′XX′X′′X′′′ spin system; right: Molecular structure of gold complex 9 4+ in 9[OTf]4; hydrogen atoms, solvate molecules, and anions are omitted for clarity and ellipsoids are set at 50 % probability; inset shows top view of the structure. Selected bond lengths [Å]: Au1–Au2 3.4341(3), Au2–Au3 3.27349(12), Au3–Au4 3.16209(16), Au4–Au1 3.1926(3), P1–P2 2.1958(13), P3–P4 2.1914(13), P5–P6 2.1900(14), P7–P8 2.1910(14).

Left: 31P{H} NMR spectrum of 9 4+ (pan class="Chemical">CD3CN, 235 K); insets show the zoom in of the experimental (upwards) and the iteratively fitted (downwards) AA′A′′A′′′XX′X′′X′′′ spin system; right: Molecular structure of gold complex 9 4+ in 9[OTf]4; hydrogen atoms, solvate molecules, and anions are omitted for clarity and ellipsoids are set at 50 % probability; inset shows top view of the structure. Selected bond lengths [Å]: Au1Au2 3.4341(3), Au2–Au3 3.27349(12), Au3–Au4 3.16209(16), Au4–Au1 3.1926(3), P1–P2 2.1958(13), P3–P4 2.1914(13), P5–P6 2.1900(14), P7–P8 2.1910(14). Reaction of 5 b[OTf] with AuCl(pan class="Chemical">tht); i) THF, r.t., 1 h; 9[OTf]4: 85 %. Recrystallization of the precipitate by diffusion of benzene into a saturated CH3CN solution of 9[OTf]4 gave yellow–orange colored crystals suitable for X‐ray analysis, which revealed the tetranuclear, helical structure of the tetracation 9 4+. The homometallic core features three short Au−Au contacts (3.27349(12) Å, 3.16209(16) Å and 3.1926(3) Å) being well in the range of aurophilic interactions.30 One large Au1Au2 distance of 3.4341(3) Å is at the upper limit for a significant bonding contribution (Figure 3, right). The P−P bond lengths range from 2.1900(14) to 2.1958(13) Å as expected for P−P single bonds.1 The average Au−P distance of the phosphanide atoms (P1, P3, P5 and P7) towards the gold atoms (2.3332(9) Å to 2.3557(9) Å) is slightly larger than for the diphenyl phosphanyl atoms (P2, P4, P6 and P8) (2.2908(9) Å to 2.3062(9) Å), indicating a stronger donor ability of the phosphanyl moiety. The diagonal Au−Au separations of 4.2052(2) Å and 4.2552(3) Å are significantly smaller compared to other square planar tetranuclear gold complexes.31 This leads to a rhombic cluster with an angle of 132° between the planes Au1,Au2,Au3 and Au1,Au3,Au4. Mechanistically, the formation of 9[OTf]4 is considered as a PP bond cleavage reaction of 5 b[OTf] by nucleophilic chloride anions to give Ph2PCl and the diphosphanide ligand Ph2PPLC iPr, which subsequently aggregates to complex 9 4+. To evaluate the chloride‐induced fragmentation in the aforementioned reactions, we further reacted compound 5 b[OTf] with one equivalent CuCl, CuOTf⋅4 CH3CN and AgOTf, respectively (Scheme 6). The equimolar reaction of 5 b[OTf] with CuCl is rather unselective as judged by the 31P NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture, indicating again a chloride induced P−P bond cleavage reaction in 5 b + (Supporting Information, Figure S14).21
Scheme 6

Reaction of 5 b[OTf] with CuOTf⋅4 CH3CN and AgOTf; i) C6H5F/CH3CN (v/v=1:1), r.t., 1 h; 10[OTf]2: 46 %; 11[OTf]2: 52 %.

Reaction of 5 b[OTf] with CuOTf⋅4 CH3CN and AgOTf; i) pan class="Chemical">C6H5F/CH3CN (v/v=1:1), r.t., 1 h; 10[OTf]2: 46 %; 11[OTf]2: 52 %. This notion is supported by reactions of 5 b[OTf] with one equivalent CuOTf⋅4 CH3CN and AgOTf, which yield the expected coordination complexes 10[OTf]2 and 11[OTf]2, respectively. The molecular structures of these compounds contain the intact triphosphane 5 b.32 The 31P NMR spectra of the isolated complexes give rise to a broadened AX2 spin system (10 2+: δ(PA)=−56.4, δ(PX)=−16.5, 1 J(PAPX)=−195 Hz and 11 2+: δ(PA)=−57.7, δ(PX)=−7.2, 1 J(PAPX)=−191 Hz), being only slightly shifted compared to the free ligand (see above).21 Single crystals suitable for X‐ray analysis were obtained by slow diffusion of Et2O into a saturated CH3CN solution of 10[OTf]2 (Figure 4). The Cu atom is coordinated only to one terminal P atom of the triphosphane moiety, which contradicts the symmetrical spin system observed in solution by 31P NMR spectroscopy. Presumably, a fast exchange of the metal atom between the two terminal P atoms of the ligand occurs in solution.21 The bonding parameters in 10 2+ are comparable to those of the free ligand 5 b +, only the P2‐P1‐P3 bond angle is widened (10 2+ P2‐P1‐P3 115.12(3)° vs. 5 b + P2‐P1‐P3 106.539(19)°) upon coordination to the Cu atom.
Figure 4

Molecular structure of 10 2+ in 10[OTf]2;33 hydrogen atoms, solvate molecules, and anions are omitted for clarity and ellipsoids are set at 50 % probability; selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°]: C1–P1 1.836(2), P1–P2 2.2095(7), P2–P3 2.2326(7), P2–Cu 2.2190(6), P2‐P1‐P3 115.12(3).

Molecular structure of 10 2+ in 10[OTf]2;33 pan class="Chemical">hydrogen atoms, solvate molecules, and anions are omitted for clarity and ellipsoids are set at 50 % probability; selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°]: C1–P1 1.836(2), P1–P2 2.2095(7), P2–P3 2.2326(7), P2–Cu 2.2190(6), P2‐P1‐P3 115.12(3).

Conclusion

An efficient method for the synthesis of cationic polyphosphorus compounds using imidazoliumyl‐substituted dipyrazoylphosphane salts 3 a,b[OTf] as suitable P1 precursors is presented. Our approach using P−P condensation and P−N/P−P bond metathesis enables the formation of cationic polyphosphanes with excellent selectivity. Thereby, the very small family of cationic polyphosphanes (P; n>2) has been considerably extended. The practical utility of this method is illustrated by the structural diversity of the synthesized compounds. Besides cationic 1,2,3‐triphospholanium salts (4 a,b[OTf]), a dicationic catena‐tetraphosphane salt 7 a[OTf]2 was isolated and fully characterized. The potential use of these polyphosphorus cations as multidentate ligands is illustrated by the reaction of 5 b[OTf] with AuCl(tht) leading to the unusual cationic tetranuclear, helical gold complex [{(Ph2PPLC iPr)Au}4][OTf]4 (9[OTf]4) as a result of a chloride induced P−P bond cleavage reaction. Classical coordination complexes (10[OTf]2 and 11[OTf]2) are observed when the nucleophilic chloride is substituted by a weakly coordinating anion such as triflate. The preliminary results presented in this study suggest that larger polyphosphanes with an asymmetric substitution pattern could likewise become accessible. Furthermore, the potential use of such ligands in coordination chemistry is a highly attractive objective. Investigations in this direction are in progress.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  28 in total

1.  Silylphosphanes: Developments in Phosphorus Chemistry.

Authors:  Gerhard Fritz; Petra Scheer
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  A versatile protocol for the quantitative and smooth conversion of phosphane oxides into synthetically useful pyrazolylphosphonium salts.

Authors:  Kai-Oliver Feldmann; Stephen Schulz; Felix Klotter; Jan J Weigand
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 8.928

3.  The open-chain triphosphanes RMe2SiCH2P(PR'2)2 (R = Me, Ph; R' = SiMe3, Cy, Ph).

Authors:  Charlotte E Averre; Martyn P Coles; Ian R Crossley; Iain J Day
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  Multiple-charged P1-centered cations: perspectives in synthesis.

Authors:  Kai-Oliver Feldmann; Jan J Weigand
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Preparation of ligand-stabilized [P4O4]2+ by controlled hydrolysis of a Janus head type diphosphorus trication.

Authors:  Jan J Weigand; Kai-Oliver Feldmann; Antje K C Echterhoff; Andreas W Ehlers; Koop Lammertsma
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  A briefing on aurophilicity.

Authors:  Hubert Schmidbaur; Annette Schier
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  Access to catenated and branched polyphosphorus ligands and coordination complexes via a tri(pyrazolyl)phosphane.

Authors:  Kai-Oliver Feldmann; Roland Fröhlich; Jan J Weigand
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  1,2,3,4-Tetramesityl-1,4-bis(tri-n-butyltin)tetraphosphane: synthesis and molecular structure.

Authors:  Ivana Jevtovikj; Peter Lönnecke; Evamarie Hey-Hawkins
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Coordination chemistry of the cyclo-(P(5)tBu(4))(-) ion: monomeric and oligomeric copper(I), silver(I) and gold(I) complexes.

Authors:  Santiago Gómez-Ruiz; Robert Wolf; Sebastian Bauer; Henry Bittig; Andrea Schisler; Peter Lönnecke; Evamarie Hey-Hawkins
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.236

10.  Cyclotetraphosphinophosphonium ions: synthesis, structures, and pseudorotation.

Authors:  C Adam Dyker; Susanne D Riegel; Neil Burford; Michael D Lumsden; Andreas Decken
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  2 in total

1.  P-P Condensation and P-N/P-P Bond Metathesis: Facile Synthesis of Cationic Tri- and Tetraphosphanes.

Authors:  Clemens Taube; Kai Schwedtmann; Medena Noikham; Ekasith Somsook; Felix Hennersdorf; Robert Wolf; Jan J Weigand
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Coordination Chemistry and Methylation of Mixed-Substituted Tetraphosphetanes (RP-PtBu)2 (R=Ph, Py).

Authors:  Robin Schoemaker; Philipp Kossatz; Kai Schwedtmann; Felix Hennersdorf; Jan J Weigand
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 5.236

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.