| Literature DB >> 31703464 |
Kang-Hoon Kim1, Eun-Jae Park1,2, Hyun-Jae Jang1, Seung-Jae Lee1, Chan Sun Park1, Bong-Sik Yun2, Seung Woong Lee1, Mun-Chual Rho1.
Abstract
Portulaca oleracea is as a medicinal plant known for its neuroprotective, hepatoprotective, antidiabetic, antioxidant, antiEntities:
Keywords: 1-carbomethoxy-β-carboline; MAPKs; NF-κB; Portulaca oleracea; anti-inflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31703464 PMCID: PMC6891712 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24224042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of the isolated compounds (1–22).
Figure 2Selected key HMBC (plain arrow) and 1H-1H COSY (bold line) correlations for 8.
Spectroscopic data for compound 8 a in methanol-d4.
| Positions | δC c | Type | δH ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 127.0 | C | |
| 2 | 110.2 | CH | 7.13 (1H, d, 1.8) |
| 3 | 148.8 | C | |
| 4 | 148.5 | C | |
| 5 | 115.1 | CH | 6.80 (1H, overlap) |
| 6 | 121.9 | CH | 7.03 (1H, dd, 8.4, 1.8) |
| 7 | 140.9 | CH | 7.44 (1H, d, 15.6) |
| 8 | 117.3 | CH | 6.45 (1H, d, 15.6) |
| 9 | 167.9 | C | |
| OCH3-3 | 55.6 | CH3 | 3.89 (3H, s) |
| 1’ | 130.9 | C | |
| 2’ | 109.8 | CH3 | 6.92 (3H, s) |
| 3’ | 147.9 | C | |
| 4’ | 146.2 | C | |
| 5’ | 114.8 | CH | 6.80 (1H, overlap) |
| 6’ | 119.5 | CH | 6.80 (1H, overlap) |
| 7’ | 82.2 | CH | 4.26 (1H, dd, 8.4, 4.8) |
| 8’α | 48.2 | CH2 | 3.53 (1H, dd, 13.8, 4.8) |
| 8’β | 3.42 (1H, dd, 13.8, 8.4) | ||
| OCH3-3’ | 55.1 | CH3 | 3.86 (3H, s) |
| OCH3-7’ | 45.7 | CH3 | 3.24 (3H, s) |
a TMS was used as an internal standard; chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm; J values are reported in Hz. Data were measured in methanol–d4 at b 600 MHz or c 150 MHz.
Figure 3Nitric oxide screening in P. oleracea constituents in RAW 264.7 cell line. (A) NO screening was evaluated among 22 constituents in P. oleracea. NO screening was performed as triplicate tests, and results are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). (B) For selected compounds 15 and 20, MTT assay was performed at 1 to 100 μM. MTT assay was performed as triplicate tests, and results are expressed as means ± SEM. An unpaired Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis. * p < 0.05 versus Con. Con: control, LPS: lipopolysaccharide, Dx: dexamethasone.
Figure 4Compound 15 and 20 showed anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting proinflammatory mediators. (A) Compounds 15 and 20 decreased iNOS expression levels in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells. (B) Relative ratio of iNOS versus β-actin was measured using densitometry, and dexamethasone was used as positive control. These graphs represented that compounds 15 and 20 dose-dependently inhibited iNOS using immunoblot analysis. Cells were pretreated with each compound for 2 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 16 h. Immunoblot analysis was performed in triplicate tests, and results are expressed as means ± SEM. An unpaired Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis. ### p < 0.001 versus Con, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 versus LPS. (C–E) The mRNA expression levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β were measured using quantitative real-time PCR experiment, and these proinflammatory cytokines were significantly diminished by compounds 15 and 21. Cells were preincubated for 2 h with compounds 1 and 3 at concentrations of 5 and 10 μM, respectively, and activated by LPS (1 μg/mL) for 2 h. Results represented as mean ± SEM, and dexamethasone was used as a positive control. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 versus Con, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 versus LPS. Con: control, LPS: lipopolysaccharide, Dx: dexamethasone.
Figure 5Compound 20 suppressed MAPK signaling pathway. (A) Immunoblot analysis showed that phosphorylated protein levels of MAPKs pathway, p38, ERK, and JNK were inhibited by compounds 20 in RAW 264.7 macrophages. (B–D) The graphs represent ratio of protein level of p38 (B), ERK (C), and JNK (D). Cells were preincubated for 2 h with compound 20 at concentration of 12.5 μM and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 1 h. Dexamethasone served as positive control. Immunoblot analysis performed as triplicate experiments, and data represented as means ± SEM. Significant difference was considered at the levels of # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 versus Con, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 versus LPS. Con: control, LPS: lipopolysaccharide, Dx: dexamethasone.
Figure 6Compound 20 suppressed activation of NF-κB. (A) Compound 20 suppressed nuclear translocation of NF-κB. After 2 h of compound 20 treatment, the cells were fixed and permeabilized. NF-κB (green) was immunostained with rabbit-anti-NF-κB followed by FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies and the nuclei (blue) were stained with DAPI. The results shown are representative of two independent experiments. (B) Immunoblot analysis displayed that translocation of NF-κB into nucleus and degradation of cytosolic IκBα were suppressed by compound 20 in RAW 264.7 cells. (C) The graph is described as relative ratio of NF-κB to lamin B. (D) The graph shows the relative ratio of IκBα to β-actin using densitometry of ImageJ. (E) The schematic pathway of compound 20 is exhibited. Cells were pretreated for 2 h with compound 20 at concentration of 12.5 μM, and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 1 h. Dexamethasone was used as positive control, and immunoblot analysis was performed as triplicate experiments. Values are means ± SEM, and an unpaired Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis. # p < 0.05, and ### p < 0.001 versus Con, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 represented significant differences from the LPS-treated group. Con: control, LPS: lipopolysaccharide, Dx: dexamethasone.