Literature DB >> 3170137

Correlation between breast parenchymal patterns and mammographers' certainty of diagnosis.

L L Fajardo1, B J Hillman, C Frey.   

Abstract

The density of breast tissue on a mammogram may affect radiologists' diagnostic decisions. To evaluate possible correlations among breast parenchymal pattern and diagnostic confidence, six radiologists classified 655 mammograms as N1, P1, P2, and DY, according to Wolfe's criteria. Evaluation of radiologists' confidence interpreting the mammograms (1 = absolutely certain, 2 = fairly certain, 3 = uncertain), shows a significant correlation between decreasing diagnostic certainty and increasing complexity of the mammographic breast parenchymal pattern. That readers are less confident in their interpretation of P2 and DY breast parenchymal patterns has implications for the operation of breast cancer screening programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3170137     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198807000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.

Authors:  William E Barlow; Chen Chi; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Carl D'Orsi; Gary Cutter; R Edward Hendrick; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Association between power law coefficients of the anatomical noise power spectrum and lesion detectability in breast imaging modalities.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Craig K Abbey; John M Boone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Edward A Sickles; Lawrence W Bassett; Daniel L Rubin; Carol H Lee; Debra M Ikeda; Ellen B Mendelson; Pamela A Wilcox; Priscilla F Butler; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Mammographic density in postmenopausal women treated with tibolone, estriol or conventional hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  I Valdivia; D Ortega
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 6.  Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

Authors:  Michelle T Le; Carmel E Mothersill; Colin B Seymour; Fiona E McNeill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Authors:  C H van Gils; J D Otten; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Ultrasonic elastography features of phyllodes tumors of the breast: a clinical research.

Authors:  Lu-Jing Li; Hong Zeng; Bing Ou; Bao-Ming Luo; Xiao-Yun Xiao; Wen-Jing Zhong; Xin-Bao Zhao; Zi-Zhuo Zhao; Hai-Yun Yang; Hui Zhi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.