H Pinson1, G Hallaert2, J Van der Meulen3, F Dedeurwaerdere4, D Vanhauwaert5, C Van den Broecke6,7, J Van Dorpe6, D Van Roost2, J P Kalala2, T Boterberg8. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. harry.pinson@ugent.be. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 4. Department of Pathology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium. 6. Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 7. Department of Pathology, AZ St. Lucas Gent, Ghent, Belgium. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP) is a frequently used technique to assess MGMT gene promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients. The optimal technical cut-off value to distinguish methylated from unmethylated samples is nevertheless still undetermined. In literature, a "grey zone" of diagnostic uncertainty has been described. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated according to the Stupp protocol. Epidemiological data were gathered from the individual patient files. MGMT gene promoter methylation status was determined on stored tumour samples using qMSP. A strong, weak or absent promoter methylation was determined based on Cq values (quantification value) of the MGMT and ACTB primers as well as a positive control sample. RESULTS: In total, 181 patient files were reviewed and included for statistical analysis. MGMT promoter hypermethylation was detected in 38.7% of glioblastoma patients. The median overall survival of unmethylated and strongly methylated patients was 10.1 months and 19.7 months respectively. Furthermore, 11% of the total patient cohort had a weak MGMT gene promoter methylation. The median OS in this subgroup was 15.4 months, significantly better compared to the unmethylated cohort (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed weak MGMT promoter methylation as an independent prognostic parameter for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Glioblastoma patients with weak promoter methylation show a statistically significant longer overall survival when compared to clearly unmethylated patients. Patients with grey zone qMSP test results should receive additional molecular analysis in future to further direct individual therapy strategies.
INTRODUCTION: Quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP) is a frequently used technique to assess MGMT gene promoter methylation in glioblastomapatients. The optimal technical cut-off value to distinguish methylated from unmethylated samples is nevertheless still undetermined. In literature, a "grey zone" of diagnostic uncertainty has been described. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed glioblastomapatients treated according to the Stupp protocol. Epidemiological data were gathered from the individual patient files. MGMT gene promoter methylation status was determined on stored tumour samples using qMSP. A strong, weak or absent promoter methylation was determined based on Cq values (quantification value) of the MGMT and ACTB primers as well as a positive control sample. RESULTS: In total, 181 patient files were reviewed and included for statistical analysis. MGMT promoter hypermethylation was detected in 38.7% of glioblastomapatients. The median overall survival of unmethylated and strongly methylated patients was 10.1 months and 19.7 months respectively. Furthermore, 11% of the total patient cohort had a weak MGMT gene promoter methylation. The median OS in this subgroup was 15.4 months, significantly better compared to the unmethylated cohort (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed weak MGMT promoter methylation as an independent prognostic parameter for overall survival. CONCLUSION:Glioblastomapatients with weak promoter methylation show a statistically significant longer overall survival when compared to clearly unmethylated patients. Patients with grey zone qMSP test results should receive additional molecular analysis in future to further direct individual therapy strategies.
Authors: Monika E Hegi; Els Genbrugge; Thierry Gorlia; Roger Stupp; Mark R Gilbert; Olivier L Chinot; L Burt Nabors; Greg Jones; Wim Van Criekinge; Josef Straub; Michael Weller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Deborah S Malley; Rifat A Hamoudi; Sylvia Kocialkowski; Danita M Pearson; Vincent Peter Collins; Koichi Ichimura Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Ulrich Herrlinger; Niklas Schäfer; Joachim P Steinbach; Astrid Weyerbrock; Peter Hau; Roland Goldbrunner; Franziska Friedrich; Veit Rohde; Florian Ringel; Uwe Schlegel; Michael Sabel; Michael W Ronellenfitsch; Martin Uhl; Jaroslaw Maciaczyk; Stefan Grau; Oliver Schnell; Mathias Hänel; Dietmar Krex; Peter Vajkoczy; Rüdiger Gerlach; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Maximilian Mehdorn; Jochen Tüttenberg; Regine Mayer-Steinacker; Rainer Fietkau; Stefanie Brehmer; Frederic Mack; Moritz Stuplich; Sied Kebir; Ralf Kohnen; Elmar Dunkl; Barbara Leutgeb; Martin Proescholdt; Torsten Pietsch; Horst Urbach; Claus Belka; Walter Stummer; Martin Glas Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alireza Mansouri; Laureen D Hachem; Sheila Mansouri; Farshad Nassiri; Normand J Laperriere; Daniel Xia; Neal I Lindeman; Patrick Y Wen; Arnab Chakravarti; Minesh P Mehta; Monika E Hegi; Roger Stupp; Kenneth D Aldape; Gelareh Zadeh Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Anneleen Decock; Maté Ongenaert; Jasmien Hoebeeck; Katleen De Preter; Gert Van Peer; Wim Van Criekinge; Ruth Ladenstein; Johannes H Schulte; Rosa Noguera; Raymond L Stallings; An Van Damme; Geneviève Laureys; Joëlle Vermeulen; Tom Van Maerken; Frank Speleman; Jo Vandesompele Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Sascha Tierling; Wiebke M Jürgens-Wemheuer; Alea Leismann; Julia Becker-Kettern; Michael Scherer; Arne Wrede; David Breuskin; Steffi Urbschat; Christoph Sippl; Joachim Oertel; Walter J Schulz-Schaeffer; Jörn Walter Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 6.551