Literature DB >> 27639200

The Clinical Implications of Inconsistently Methylated Results from Glioblastoma MGMT Testing by Replicate Methylation-Specific PCR.

Daniel Xia1, David A Reardon2, Jacqueline L Bruce3, Neal I Lindeman3.   

Abstract

The methylation status of the promoter of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase gene (MGMT) is an established prognostic and predictive biomarker of glioblastoma (GBM). At the Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, MGMT testing is performed by methylation-specific PCR with multiple replicates, leading to three types of reportable results: methylated, unmethylated, and inconsistently methylated. An inconsistently methylated result is reported when a methylated peak is seen in some but not all of the PCR replicates from a single DNA sample. To better understand the clinical implications of these results, we performed a retrospective review of all MGMT testing at our laboratory over a 5-year period, and correlated test results with outcome and specimen-quality data. This review yielded several novel findings. First, inconsistent MGMT methylation on replicate methylation-specific PCR is not uncommon, composes 12% (58/465) of our GBM results. Second, inconsistently methylated GBM cases are associated with relatively poor overall survival (more similar to unmethylated than to methylated cases). Third and interestingly, there appears to be a dose-response relationship between patient survival and the extent of methylation in inconsistently methylated GBMs. Finally, our analyses of specimen-quality data suggest that a combination of technical factors (eg, small samples) and tumor biology may explain inconsistent MGMT results on replicate methylation-specific PCR testing.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27639200     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  4 in total

1.  MGMT Promoter Methylation Cutoff with Safety Margin for Selecting Glioblastoma Patients into Trials Omitting Temozolomide: A Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Monika E Hegi; Els Genbrugge; Thierry Gorlia; Roger Stupp; Mark R Gilbert; Olivier L Chinot; L Burt Nabors; Greg Jones; Wim Van Criekinge; Josef Straub; Michael Weller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Weak MGMT gene promoter methylation confers a clinically significant survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  H Pinson; G Hallaert; J Van der Meulen; F Dedeurwaerdere; D Vanhauwaert; C Van den Broecke; J Van Dorpe; D Van Roost; J P Kalala; T Boterberg
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  An examination of critical parameters in hybridization-based epigenotyping using magnetic microparticles.

Authors:  Brooke E Tam; Yining Hao; Hadley D Sikes
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2018-07-27

4.  MGMT promoter methylation status testing to guide therapy for glioblastoma: refining the approach based on emerging evidence and current challenges.

Authors:  Alireza Mansouri; Laureen D Hachem; Sheila Mansouri; Farshad Nassiri; Normand J Laperriere; Daniel Xia; Neal I Lindeman; Patrick Y Wen; Arnab Chakravarti; Minesh P Mehta; Monika E Hegi; Roger Stupp; Kenneth D Aldape; Gelareh Zadeh
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 12.300

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.