Literature DB >> 21097691

Extent and patterns of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma- and respective glioblastoma-derived spheres.

Davide Sciuscio1, Annie-Claire Diserens, Kristof van Dommelen, Danielle Martinet, Greg Jones, Robert-Charles Janzer, Claudio Pollo, Marie-France Hamou, Bernd Kaina, Roger Stupp, Marc Levivier, Monika E Hegi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Quantitative methylation-specific tests suggest that not all cells in a glioblastoma with detectable promoter methylation of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene carry a methylated MGMT allele. This observation may indicate cell subpopulations with distinct MGMT status, raising the question of the clinically relevant cutoff of MGMT methylation therapy. Epigenetic silencing of the MGMT gene by promoter methylation blunts repair of O6-methyl guanine and has been shown to be a predictive factor for benefit from alkylating agent therapy in glioblastoma. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Ten paired samples of glioblastoma and respective glioblastoma-derived spheres (GS), cultured under stem cell conditions, were analyzed for the degree and pattern of MGMT promoter methylation by methylation-specific clone sequencing, MGMT gene dosage, chromatin status, and respective effects on MGMT expression and MGMT activity.
RESULTS: In glioblastoma, MGMT-methylated alleles ranged from 10% to 90%. In contrast, methylated alleles were highly enriched (100% of clones) in respective GS, even when 2 MGMT alleles were present, with 1 exception (<50%). The CpG methylation patterns were characteristic for each glioblastoma exhibiting 25% to 90% methylated CpGs of 28 sites interrogated. Furthermore, MGMT promoter methylation was associated with a nonpermissive chromatin status in accordance with very low MGMT transcript levels and undetectable MGMT activity.
CONCLUSIONS: In MGMT-methylated glioblastoma, MGMT promoter methylation is highly enriched in GS that supposedly comprise glioma-initiating cells. Thus, even a low percentage of MGMT methylation measured in a glioblastoma sample may be relevant and predict benefit from an alkylating agent therapy. ©2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21097691     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  32 in total

1.  MGMT Promoter Methylation Cutoff with Safety Margin for Selecting Glioblastoma Patients into Trials Omitting Temozolomide: A Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Monika E Hegi; Els Genbrugge; Thierry Gorlia; Roger Stupp; Mark R Gilbert; Olivier L Chinot; L Burt Nabors; Greg Jones; Wim Van Criekinge; Josef Straub; Michael Weller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Treatment considerations for MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jennie W Taylor; David Schiff
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  Glioblastoma cancer stem cells: Biomarker and therapeutic advances.

Authors:  Kelli B Pointer; Paul A Clark; Michael Zorniak; Bahauddeen M Alrfaei; John S Kuo
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Weak MGMT gene promoter methylation confers a clinically significant survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  H Pinson; G Hallaert; J Van der Meulen; F Dedeurwaerdere; D Vanhauwaert; C Van den Broecke; J Van Dorpe; D Van Roost; J P Kalala; T Boterberg
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Clinical implications of molecular neuropathology and biomarkers for malignant glioma.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Monika Hegi; Roger Stupp; Michael Weller
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  Assessment of molecular markers demonstrates concordance between samples acquired via stereotactic biopsy and open craniotomy in both anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas.

Authors:  Florian Gessler; Peter Baumgarten; Joshua D Bernstock; Patrick Harter; Stephanie Lescher; Christian Senft; Volker Seifert; Gerhard Marquardt; Lutz Weise
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  MGMT methylation analysis of glioblastoma on the Infinium methylation BeadChip identifies two distinct CpG regions associated with gene silencing and outcome, yielding a prediction model for comparisons across datasets, tumor grades, and CIMP-status.

Authors:  Pierre Bady; Davide Sciuscio; Annie-Claire Diserens; Jocelyne Bloch; Martin J van den Bent; Christine Marosi; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Michael Weller; Luigi Mariani; Frank L Heppner; David R Mcdonald; Denis Lacombe; Roger Stupp; Mauro Delorenzi; Monika E Hegi
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 17.088

8.  Ependymoma stem cells are highly sensitive to temozolomide in vitro and in orthotopic models.

Authors:  Daniela Meco; Tiziana Servidei; Giuseppe Lamorte; Elena Binda; Vincenzo Arena; Riccardo Riccardi
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  EMAP-II sensitize U87MG and glioma stem-like cells to temozolomide via induction of autophagy-mediated cell death and G2/M arrest.

Authors:  Qi Yu; Libo Liu; Ping Wang; Yilong Yao; Yixue Xue; Yunhui Liu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  DNA damage responses in cancer stem cells: Implications for cancer therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Qi-En Wang
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.