Literature DB >> 31700720

Arrhythmia-related Hospitalization and Comorbid Cannabis Use Disorder: Trend Analysis in US Hospitals (2010-2014).

Paul Rahul Jaladi1, Viralkumar Patel2, Shanthini Kuduva Rajan3, Wahida Rashid4, Sowmya Madireddy5, Temitope Ajibawo6, Sundus Imran7, Rikinkumar S Patel8.   

Abstract

Objective To study the trends of arrhythmia hospitalizations with cannabis use disorders (CUDs) in terms of demographic characteristics and inpatient outcomes. Methods We used the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) data during the post-legalization period (2010-2014) and included 570,556 arrhythmia inpatients (age, 15-54 years), and 14,426 inpatients had comorbid CUD (2.53%). We used the linear-by-linear association test and independent-sample T-test for assessing the change in hospital outcomes in inpatients with CUD. Results Arrhythmia hospitalizations with CUD increased by 31% (2010-2014). This increasing trend was seen in adults (45-54 years, P < 0.001) and was predominant in males (77.6%). Hypertension (40.6%), hyperlipidemia (17.6%), and obesity (15%) were prevalent medical comorbidities with variable trends over the five years. Among substance use disorders, tobacco (50.9%), and alcohol (31.4%) were major comorbidities with a variable trend (P = 0.003 for each). There was a 71.4% increase in the inpatient mortality rate between 2010 (0.7%) and 2014 (1.2%). The mean length of stay was three days, and the total hospitalization charges have been increasing (P < 0.001), averaging $35,812 per hospital admission. Conclusion Chronic cannabis use or abuse worsens hospitalization outcomes in arrhythmic patients, and more clinical studies are needed to study the causal association between these conditions due to the rising mortality risk.
Copyright © 2019, Jaladi et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arrhythmia; cannabis; cardiac arrhythmias; epidemiological studies; hospitalization; marijuana; national trends; recreational marijuana

Year:  2019        PMID: 31700720      PMCID: PMC6822885          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction

Arrhythmia describes an irregular heartbeat - the heart may beat too rapidly (tachycardia), too slowly (bradycardia), too early (premature contraction), or irregularly (flutter or fibrillation). Any interruption to the electrical impulses that cause the heart to contract can result in arrhythmia. Several factors can cause the heart to work incorrectly, including alcohol abuse, diabetes, substance abuse, excessive coffee consumption, congestive heart failure, hypertension, hyperthyroidism, mental stress, scarring of the heart due to a heart attack, and smoking. A healthy person will hardly ever suffer from long-term arrhythmia unless they have an external trigger, such as drug abuse or an electric shock. Most arrhythmias are non-fatal, but some can predispose the individual to stroke or cardiac arrest. Currently, cannabis is used by a large proportion of the world population. It is produced on a large scale, and it is mainly used as an illicit substance by a large number of people across the world. It is estimated that 182.5 million people all over the world are using cannabis, which is about 3.8% of the total world population. Similarly, cannabis use is seen in the North American population, with an estimated annual prevalence of 11.6%, the majority within the age group of 15 to 64 years [1]. Since the majority of the people around the world, especially youth, use cannabis for recreational purposes, the trend of which is increasing globally, many people have led movements to decriminalize cannabis in different parts of the world. Recently, cannabis has been approved for use clinically for several medical conditions in various parts of the world. In the United States (US), a total of 25 states and the District of Columbia have allowed the use of cannabis for medical purposes [2]. Cannabis has arrhythmogenic properties [3-6]. Cannabis causes rapid development of tolerance to its effects with repeated exposures within a short period over one to two days. Chronic marijuana use causes a decrease in sympathetic activity and an increase in parasympathetic activity. These changes are reflected in our body by a decrease in heart rate (HR), increase in blood volume, absence of orthostatic hypotension, and decrease in circulatory response to exercise [6]. Several studies have demonstrated the arrhythmogenic properties of cannabis. A study on Norwegian apprehended drivers demonstrated that a higher mean pulse rate is seen in drivers who are tested positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, an active ingredient of cannabis) as compared to drivers who are tested negative for THC. It also demonstrated that the rate of increase in HR was independent of the THC concentration in the blood [7]. A study on young people demonstrated that cannabis use causes atrial fibrillation in young people without any risk factors for atrial fibrillation in them [4,8]. In a systematic review of six case reports, Korantzopoulos et al. [4] hypothesized that cannabis use causes adrenergic stimulation and a decrease in the duration of the action potential. It causes changes in the electrophysiological properties of the myocardium, which favors automaticity and micro re-entry. Cannabis has a detrimental effect on coronary microcirculation and it causes atrial ischemia. Based on this, they concluded that cannabis smoking causes atrial fibrillation [4]. There are few case reports on cannabis use and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation that may be due to excessive catecholamine release [9-11]. Some case reports demonstrated that excessive cannabis consumption causes a shortening of action potential and an increase in the vagal tone, which leads to Brugada-like ST-segment abnormalities [12-14]. The objective of this study is to study the trends of hospitalizations for arrhythmias with cannabis use disorder (CUD) in terms of demographic characteristics and inpatient outcomes, including the severity of illness, length of stay (LOS), and total charges during hospitalization.

Materials and methods

Data source We performed a retrospective analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) data from January 2010 to December 2014 from the healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) [15]. The NIS provides discharge data from 4,400 hospitals across 45 states in the US, and when discharge weights are applied, the analysis result is a weighted estimate of nationally-representative total hospitalizations [15]. Diagnostic information in the NIS is detected using the international classification of diseases, ninth edition (ICD-9) codes and clinical classification software (CCS) codes [16]. Inclusion criteria and outcome variables We included patients (age 15 to 54 years) with a primary discharge diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmia using the ICD-9 codes 427.0-427.2, 427.31, 427.32, 427.60, 427.61, 427.69, 427.81, 427.89, 427.9, 785.0, or 785.1) and a secondary discharge diagnosis of CUD using the ICD-9 codes 304.30, 304.31, 304.32, 305.20, 305.21, or 305.22 [17]. Demographic variables studied included age group (15-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54), gender (male or female), and race (Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, or other) [18]. The existing risk factors for cardiac arrhythmia were based on the past literature and identified using ICD-9 diagnosis codes and CCS codes. We evaluated the differences in inpatient outcomes in the study population, and the outcome variables comprised the severity of illness (loss of functions measured as minor, moderate, and major) and in-hospital mortality (number of deaths during hospitalization) [18]. In the NIS, LOS is calculated as the total number of nights the patient was hospitalized for arrhythmia management and the total charges during hospitalization do not include professional fees and other non-covered charges [18]. Statistical analysis We used the linear-by-linear association test for assessing the differences in demographics, comorbidities, and inpatient outcomes and the independent sample T-test for evaluating the changes seen in LOS and total charges over the study period from 2010 to 2014. A P-value less than 0.05 was used to determine the statistical significance and the analysis was conducted on the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 25 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, US). Ethical approval Individual identifiers [18] were used to protect the patient's identity and other clinical information. The use of NIS under the HCUP does not require approval from the institutional review board, as the NIS is a publicly available de-identified database [15].

Results

We analyzed 570,556 patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of arrhythmias from 2010 to 2014, from which 14,426 inpatients had comorbid CUD (2.53%). Arrhythmia inpatients with CUD were mostly males (77.6%) and adults (age 45 to 54 years, 43.4%). About half of them were Caucasians (51.2%) followed by African Americans (34.1%), Hispanics (9.8%), and other races or ethnicities (4.8%). There was an increasing trend in arrhythmia hospitalizations with comorbid CUD from 2,536 (in 2010) to 3,325 (in 2014), representing a 31% increase over five years. There are variable trends in CUD with arrhythmia over the years from 2010 to 2014 in the age groups 15-24, 25-34, and 35-44 (P < 0.001). There is a statistically significant increasing trend seen in the age group 45-54 (P < 0.001). Arrhythmia was predominant in male cannabis users (77.6%), but there was a variable trend seen from 2010 to 2014. Differences between races showed statistically non-significant and variable trends (P = 0.474) among Caucasians (51.2%), African Americans (34.1%), Hispanics (9.8%), and other races or ethnicities (4.8%). Hypertension (40.6%), hyperlipidemia (17.6%), and obesity (15%) were the most common medical comorbidities found in arrhythmia inpatients with CUD. There are variable trends in arrhythmia with CUD patients with comorbid diabetes, hypertension, obesity, elevated cholesterol, and lipids over the five-year study period. Among substance use disorders, tobacco (50.9%) and alcohol (31.4%) were significant comorbidities in these inpatients. Variable trends are seen with comorbid alcohol and tobacco use disorder in arrhythmia with CUD patients with statistical significance (P = 0.003), as shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Demographic trends of arrhythmia inpatients with cannabis use disorder

Variable 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total P value
Number of arrhythmia inpatients 122592 122749 116610 108050 100555 570556 -
Number of arrhythmia inpatients with cannabis use disorder 2536 2885 2875 2805 3325 14426 -
Prevalence 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.6 3.3 2.5  
Age at admission, in %
15 – 24 years 12.6 16.0 12.0 14.6 12.9 13.6 <0.001
25 – 34 years 25.0 22.3 21.0 23.4 20.0 22.2
35 – 44 years 20.7 20.7 22.8 18.0 21.5 20.8
45 – 54 years 41.7 41.0 44.2 44.0 45.6 43.4
Sex, in %
Male 76.3 77.3 75.0 78.4 80.6 77.6 <0.001
Female 23.7 22.7 25.0 21.6 19.4 22.4
Race, in %
Caucasian 47.2 54.2 51.1 51.5 51.6 51.2 0.474
African American 38.3 31.9 33.2 31.8 35.6 34.1
Hispanic 9.6 9.5 10.7 11.4 8.2 9.8
Other 4.8 4.3 5.1 5.3 4.6 4.8
Comorbid risk factors, in %
Diabetes 9.8 10.0 9.2 10.7 12.2 10.5 0.001
Hypertension 34.8 42.8 40.2 39.2 44.7 40.6 <0.001
Obesity 9.1 16.4 17.6 14.4 16.5 15.0 <0.001
Elevated cholesterol and lipids 14.8 18.1 20.0 17.5 17.3 17.6 0.104
Alcohol use disorder 32.3 34.7 28.3 32.3 29.6 31.4 0.003
Tobacco use disorder 50.6 51.4 44.3 55.1 52.9 50.9 0.003
Majority of the inpatients with CUD were admitted for arrhythmia on a non-elective basis (95.8%). There are variable trends in arrhythmic inpatients with CUD developing minor, moderate, and major severity of illness over the years from 2010 to 2014 with statistical significance (P < 0.001). The mean number of chronic conditions is also variable with statistical significance (P < 0.001). Arrhythmia inpatients with CUD had a variable trend (P < 0.001) in inpatient mortality, but there is 71.4% increase in the inpatient mortality rate between 2010 (0.7%) and 2014 (1.2%). Trends in inpatient outcomes in arrhythmia hospitalizations with CUD are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Inpatient outcome trends of arrhythmia inpatients with cannabis use disorder

SD: standard deviation

Variable20102011201220132014TotalP value
Admission type, in %
Non-elective95.095.796.097.095.395.80.005
Elective5.04.34.03.04.74.2
Severity of illness, in %
Minor34.632.735.738.330.534.2<0.001
Moderate40.138.844.539.842.741.2
Major25.428.619.821.926.824.6
Mean number of chronic conditions (SD)5.8 (2.57)6.2 (2.77)6.3 (2.82)6.3 (2.84)6.7 (2.91)6.3 (2.81)<0.001
In-hospital mortality, in %
Inpatient deaths0.70.71.40.21.20.9<0.001
Other outcomes
Mean length of stay (SD), in days2.9 (2.89)2.8 (3.07)2.8 (3.10)3.2 (6.03)3.2 (3.27)3.0 (3.85)<0.001
Mean total charges (SD), in $33561.9431614.4831192.3837891.4643470.2835812.28<0.001

Inpatient outcome trends of arrhythmia inpatients with cannabis use disorder

SD: standard deviation The mean LOS was three days, and it remains more or less around three days over the study period with statistical significance (P < 0.001), whereas total hospitalization charges have been increasing significantly (P < 0.001), averaging $35,812 per hospital admission, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Trends in inpatient mean length of stay and total charges, 2010-2014

Discussion

This study describes the trend examination of arrhythmia hospitalizations and comorbid CUD using the US population-based inpatient data during the post-legalization period (2010 to 2014). Our study findings are supporting existing literature about cannabis abuse and dependence and its impact on vascular function and arrhythmia [3-6,19-20]. Cannabis has arrhythmogenic properties. Cannabis smoking causes reflex tachycardia due to cannabis-induced vasodilation [3-4]. It causes a 20% to 100% increase in HR. It also causes a slight increase in supine blood pressure. This increase in HR lasts for about two to three hours. Cannabis causes postural hypotension associated with dizziness and fainting when consumed in higher doses [5-6]. Our study showed a significant increase in arrhythmia hospitalizations with comorbid CUD by 31% during the post-legalization period that brings an important public health concern. CUD may be an associated risk factor for hospitalization due to its arrhythmogenic properties. These patients have various comorbid conditions like diabetes, hypertension, obesity, elevated cholesterol and lipids, and alcohol and tobacco abuse. These risk factors also play a significant role in the development of arrhythmia in patients with cannabis abuse or dependence [4,7-8]. These comorbid risk factors may have synergistic effects with cannabis and potentially increase the chances of arrhythmia hospitalization. We found that a higher proportion of arrhythmia hospitalizations with CUD were in adults aged 45 to 54 years, which may be due to an increase in comorbid conditions at an older age [21]. There are few case reports on chronic cannabis use and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation that may be due to excessive catecholamine release [10-11]. It is speculated that excessive catecholamine release in cannabis users could be responsible for the arrhythmia [11]. In our study, 52.9% arrhythmia inpatients with CUD have comorbid tobacco abuse or dependence, which indicates an important problem of tobacco in cannabis users that may increase the chances of arrhythmia hospitalizations [22]. The study highlights the increase in arrhythmia hospitalizations, total inpatient charges, and mortality in patients with comorbid CUD. This is mainly reflected by several findings in our study, including increase in the mean length of stay (three days), average hospitalization total charges of $35,812, and 71.4% increase in in-hospital mortality during the management of arrhythmia [20,23]. The increase in hospitalization costs is due to an increase in the overall severity of illness by 5.5% [20] and a number of chronic conditions by 15.52% [21,24-25]. There are some limitations to our study. As per our knowledge, this is one of the pioneer studies; we did not have enough literature to support our results adequately. Our study nevertheless utilizes the NIS dataset and lays the basis for these results, which will have substantial consequences for future studies. The second limitation was that the readmission status for the participants could not be looked upon, and this is due to the nature of the database. However, since this database is a robust population-based register with a high generalisability, it outweighs the significance of these results in comparison to limitations for this study. This research nevertheless possesses some strengths. First, in the form of generalization of outcomes, our research shows strong internal validity. Secondly, this is the first study that evaluates the patterns and effects of CUD on arrhythmia hospitalization and its impact on inpatient outcomes. The study findings indicate that healthcare expenses are increasing inadvertently, primarily due to the use of cannabis and to avoidable risk factors. The ultimate strength of the study is how the study eliminates a reporting bias by using the NIS dataset, and its distinctive feature is that information is coded separately from the physician.

Conclusions

There is a decreasing trend in the number of arrhythmia cases in inpatient US hospitalizations, but there is an increase in the number of inpatient hospitalizations with arrhythmia having CUD as per our study. A statistically significant rising trend of arrhythmia hospitalization with CUD is seen in adults (45 to 54 years), males, and Caucasians. Cardiometabolic comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, had an increasing linear trend in these inpatients. Hence, there was a spike seen in the severity of illness and the number of chronic conditions, which may have indirectly attributed to the increasing hospitalization costs for arrhythmia management in cannabis users. Despite all these measures, in-hospital mortality rose by 71.4% during the post-legalization period. The outcomes in arrhythmic patients with CUD are presumably worse due to chronic cannabis abuse. More clinical studies are required to demonstrate a causal association between episodic cannabis use and arrhythmia. Since medical cannabis laws are passed in the US, large-scale epidemiological studies are also needed to assess the potential risks in cannabis users due to an increase in the use of cannabis for therapeutic purposes.
  20 in total

1.  Toxic effects of marijuana on the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Balaji Pratap; Aleksandr Korniyenko
Journal:  Cardiovasc Toxicol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Brugada electrocardiogram pattern induced by cannabis; is cannabis safe?

Authors:  Joaquín Valle Alonso; Beatrix Huei-Yi Teo; F Javier Fonseca Del Pozo; Miguel Angel Aguayo; Almudena Sanchez
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Ventricular tachycardia due to marijuana use in a heart transplant patient.

Authors:  Ignacio J Sánchez Lázaro; Luis Almenar Bonet; María José Sancho-Tello; Luis Martínez-Dolz
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.753

Review 4.  Cardiovascular consequences of marijuana use.

Authors:  Stephen Sidney
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 5.  Cardiovascular system effects of marijuana.

Authors:  Reese T Jones
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.126

6.  Is Cannabis Use Associated With Increased Risk of Cigarette Smoking Initiation, Persistence, and Relapse? Longitudinal Data From a Representative Sample of US Adults.

Authors:  Andrea H Weinberger; Jonathan Platt; Jan Copeland; Renee D Goodwin
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 4.384

7.  Is recent cannabis use associated with acute coronary syndromes? An illustrative case series.

Authors:  Isabelle Casier; Philippe Vanduynhoven; Steven Haine; Chris Vrints; Philippe G Jorens
Journal:  Acta Cardiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Frequency and irregularity of heart rate in drivers suspected of driving under the influence of cannabis.

Authors:  Hassan Z Khiabani; Jørg Mørland; Jørgen G Bramness
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.487

Review 9.  Marijuana Use and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Christopher A Franz; William H Frishman
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Karen Barnett; Stewart W Mercer; Michael Norbury; Graham Watt; Sally Wyke; Bruce Guthrie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-Associated Infections: Update on an Emerging Issue.

Authors:  Anasua Deb; Abhilash Perisetti; Hemant Goyal; Mark M Aloysius; Sonali Sachdeva; Dushyant Dahiya; Neil Sharma; Nirav Thosani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.487

2.  Proposing a "Brain Health Checkup (BHC)" as a Global Potential "Standard of Care" to Overcome Reward Dysregulation in Primary Care Medicine: Coupling Genetic Risk Testing and Induction of "Dopamine Homeostasis".

Authors:  Eric R Braverman; Catherine A Dennen; Mark S Gold; Abdalla Bowirrat; Ashim Gupta; David Baron; A Kenison Roy; David E Smith; Jean Lud Cadet; Kenneth Blum
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Prevalence of Cannabis Use and Factors Related to Hospitalizations in the United States: A Population-Based Study Using National Inpatient Sample Between 2012 and 2018.

Authors:  Saanie Sulley; Memory Ndanga; Abimbola K Saka
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.