| Literature DB >> 35262904 |
Anasua Deb1, Abhilash Perisetti2, Hemant Goyal3, Mark M Aloysius4,5, Sonali Sachdeva6, Dushyant Dahiya7, Neil Sharma8,9, Nirav Thosani10.
Abstract
Over 17.7 million gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures are performed annually, contributing to 68% of all endoscopic procedures in the United States. Usually, endoscopic procedures are low risk, but adverse events may occur, including cardiopulmonary complications, bleeding, perforation, pancreatitis, cholangitis, and infection. Infections after the GI endoscopies most commonly result from the patient's endogenous gut flora. Although many studies have reported infection after GI endoscopic procedures, a true estimate of the incidence rate of post-endoscopy infection is lacking. In addition, the infection profile and causative organisms have evolved over time. In recent times, multi-drug-resistant microorganisms have emerged as a cause of outbreaks of endoscope-associated infections (EAI). In addition, lapses in endoscope reprocessing have been reported, with some but not all outbreaks in recent times. This systematic review summarizes the demographical, clinical, and management data of EAI events reported in the literature. A total of 117 articles were included in the systematic review, with the majority reported from North America and Western Europe. The composite infection rate was calculated to be 0.2% following GI endoscopic procedures, 0.8% following ERCP, 0.123% following non-ERCP upper GI endoscopic procedures, and 0.073% following lower GI endoscopic procedures. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common culprit organism, followed by other Enterobacteriaceae groups of organisms and Gram-positive cocci. We have also elaborated different prevention methods such as antimicrobial prophylaxis, adequate sterilization methods for reprocessing endoscopes, periodic surveillance, and current evidence supporting their utilization. Finally, we discuss disposable endoscopes, which could be an alternative to reprocessing to minimize the chances of EAIs with their effects on the environmental and financial situation.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic prophyalxis; Contamination; Duodenoscopy; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Endoscopy, colonoscopy; Esophagogastroduodenoscopy; Infection; Infections; Transmission
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35262904 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07441-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dig Dis Sci ISSN: 0163-2116 Impact factor: 3.487