| Literature DB >> 31700532 |
Li-Jun Cao1, Yong-Fu Gao1,2, Ya-Jun Gong1, Jin-Cui Chen1, Min Chen2, Ary Hoffmann3, Shu-Jun Wei1.
Abstract
Biological invasions of pests into climatically unsuitable areas can be facilitated by human-regulated environments, in which case there may be an impact on genetic structure through population processes and/or adaptation. Here, we investigated the population genetic structure of an invasive agricultural pest, Thrips palmi, in China, which has expanded its distribution range through using greenhouses. Early invaded populations showed a relatively higher level of genetic diversity than recently expanded greenhouse populations. Strong population genetic structure corresponded to a pattern of isolation by distance, with no recent gene flow and low historical gene flow among populations, reflecting limited ongoing dispersal. A genetic signature of population expansion was detected in early invaded populations and three northern populations from greenhouses, suggesting that the greenhouse environments facilitated expansion of this species. Redundancy analysis showed that the independent effects of environment and geography could explain 51.68% and 32.06% of the genetic variance, respectively. These findings point to climate- and greenhouse-related spatial expansion, with the potential for adaptation by T. palmi. They emphasize the contribution of human-regulated environments on the successes of this invasive species, a situation likely to apply to other invasive species that use greenhouse environments.Entities:
Keywords: Thrips palmi; biological invasion; climatic adaptation; demographic history; population genetic structure
Year: 2019 PMID: 31700532 PMCID: PMC6824073 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12847
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Appl ISSN: 1752-4571 Impact factor: 5.183
Collection information for specimens of Thrips palmi used in the study
| Code | Collection location | Longitude (E) | Latitude ( | Collection date | Host plant | Habit | No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JANP | Japan, Okinawa | 127°49'59.99" | 26°19'59.99" | Jan/2016 | Cucumber | Field | 24 |
| HNSY | Hainan Province, Sanya | 109°27'32.70" | 18°18'19.61" | Mar/2018 | Eggplant | Field | 24 |
| YNXS | Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna | 100°45'4.34" | 21°42'17.11" | Apr/2018 | Eggplant | Field | 24 |
| SCPZ | Sichuan Province, Panzhihua | 102°0'2.61" | 26°55'57.89" | May/2016 | Eggplant | Field | 24 |
| SCCA | Sichuan Province, Chengdu | 104°26'35.55" | 30°37'51.37" | Jul/2017 | Eggplant | Field | 15 |
| SCCB | Sichuan Province, Chengdu | 103°54'27.15" | 31°2'42.66" | Aug/2018 | Eggplant | Field | 24 |
| GDSZ | Guangdong Province, Shenzhen | 114°20'51.70" | 22°39'26.86" | Apr/2018 | Eggplant | Field | 24 |
| HNCS | Hunan Province, Changsha | 113°10'37.19" | 28°15'31.19" | Jul/2017 | Eggplant | Field | 24 |
| HNZK | Henan Province, Zhoukou | 114°28'41.11" | 33°47'37.07" | Sep/2017 | Cucumber | Field | 22 |
| JSNJ | Jiangsu Province, Nanjing | 118°50'56.17" | 32°4'18.35" | Jul/2017 | Eggplant | Field | 23 |
| SDSG | Shandong Province, Shouguang | 118°33'14.19" | 36°49'11.09" | May/2017 | Cucumber | Greenhouse | 24 |
| BJDX | Beijing, Daxing district, Yufa town | 116°20'9.79" | 39°31'0.78" | Jul/2017 | Eggplant | Greenhouse | 24 |
| BJFS | Beijing, Fangshan district | 116°2'48.42" | 39°38'42.82" | Jun/2016 | Eggplant | Greenhouse | 24 |
| BJCY | Beijing, Chaoyang district | 116°31'18.10" | 39°57'32.23" | Oct/2017 | Eggplant | Greenhouse | 24 |
| LNAS | Liaoning Province, Anshan | 122°36'27.62" | 41°4'31.80" | Sep/2018 | Eggplant | Greenhouse | 24 |
Except for JANP, all other populations are from China. No., the number of individuals used for microsatellite genotyping and mitochondrial cox1 sequencing.
Figure 1Sampling locations (red points in figure a) and population genetic structure of the 15 Thrips palmi populations inferred from BAPS analysis (pie charts in figure a) and STRUCTURE (b) based on 26 microsatellite markers. In the BAPS analysis, distributions of the seven identified clusters are shown by different colors. The color proportions in the pie charts represent the frequency of each cluster in a population. The red circle shows the central and eastern group (CE), and the blue circle shows the northern group (NT) of populations collected from greenhouses (a). In the STRUCTURE analysis, the optimal K determined based on delta K was 4. Clusters of individuals when K is 4, 5, and 6 are presented. Four outlier populations of JANP, HNSY, SCPZ, and YNXS, as well as two population groups of EC and NT, are presented. Codes for collection sites are shown in Table 1
Genetic diversity of the 15 populations of Thrips palmi based on 26 microsatellite loci and mtDNA
| Population | Diversity level | Microsatellites | Mitochondrial DNA | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| JANP | Very low | 0.2803 | 0.3208 | 0.3213 | −0.0769 | 1.91 | 67 | 62.62 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.0000 |
| HNSY | Low | 0.5050 | 0.6362 | 0.6360 | 0.0195 | 4.20 | 192 | 158.97 | 0.32 | 5 | 0.32 | 0.0011 |
| YNXS | High | 0.6174 | 0.7211 | 0.7209 | 0.0844 | 6.31 | 240 | 201.66 | 0.63 | 5 | 0.44 | 0.0044 |
| SCPZ | High | 0.5545 | 0.7829 | 0.7817 | 0.1840 | 6.48 | 297 | 241.68 | 0.97 | 3 | 0.30 | 0.0030 |
| SCCA | Medium | 0.6491 | 0.7423 | 0.7423 | 0.0408 | 5.87 | 209 | 209.00 | 0.26 | 4 | 0.61 | 0.0030 |
| SCCB | Medium | 0.5848 | 0.7089 | 0.7076 | 0.1282 | 5.21 | 210 | 176.91 | 0.08 | 3 | 0.24 | 0.0006 |
| GDSZ | Medium | 0.5719 | 0.6439 | 0.6432 | 0.0819 | 5.16 | 185 | 156.83 | 0.24 | 3 | 0.22 | 0.0006 |
| HNCS | Medium | 0.5901 | 0.6771 | 0.6762 | 0.0479 | 5.10 | 209 | 177.32 | 0.13 | 5 | 0.64 | 0.0020 |
| HNZK | Medium | 0.5774 | 0.6630 | 0.6629 | 0.0649 | 4.84 | 196 | 168.90 | 0.17 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.0000 |
| JSNJ | Low | 0.5437 | 0.6459 | 0.6452 | 0.0908 | 4.31 | 170 | 148.19 | 0.19 | 2 | 0.29 | 0.0007 |
| SDSG | Low | 0.5773 | 0.6223 | 0.6214 | 0.0471 | 4.64 | 170 | 144.82 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.29 | 0.0007 |
| BJDX | Low | 0.5737 | 0.5956 | 0.5953 | 0.0375 | 4.12 | 122 | 114.16 | 0.04 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.0000 |
| BJFS | Low | 0.5776 | 0.6340 | 0.6330 | 0.0587 | 4.56 | 157 | 138.01 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.0000 |
| BJCY | Low | 0.5657 | 0.6574 | 0.6566 | 0.0447 | 4.11 | 157 | 138.42 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.23 | 0.0006 |
| LNAS | Low | 0.5952 | 0.6219 | 0.6215 | 0.0366 | 4.57 | 149 | 131.63 | 0.04 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.0000 |
The diversity level was classified based on the overall genetic diversity of all estimated parameters. The last five populations were collected from greenhouses.
Abbreviations: π, nucleotide diversity; A R, average allelic richness; A S, standardized total number of alleles for 15 specimens per samples; A T, total number of alleles; F IS, inbreeding coefficient; h, haplotype diversity; H, number of haplotype; H ES, standardized expected heterozygosity (for 15 specimens); H ET, expected heterozygosity; H O, observed heterozygosity; P AR, private allelic richness.
Pairwise F ST among 15 populations of Thrips palmi
All values are statistically significant under p = .01. Values were shaded from high to low by deep blue to deep red. Five populations collected from greenhouses are underlined.
Figure 2Distribution of the mitochondrial cox1 haplotypes in each population (a) and split networks of the haplotypes inferred from SPLITSTREE (b). Different colors in the pie charts indicate the proportion of haplotypes in each population. The populations in the blue circle were collected from greenhouses. The three black arrows point to six individuals with the genetically distant haplotype of Hap7 in three southwestern populations of YNXS, SCPZ, and SCCB
Historical effective number of migrants per generation among populations and effective population size (Theta) of Thrips palmi
The effective number of migrants per generation is shaded from high to low by deep blue to deep red. Five populations collected from greenhouses are underlined.
Estimated population size of Thrips palmi populations estimated by the maximum‐likelihood method implemented in Migraine
| Population | OnePop model | OnePopVarSize model | Population size variation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pGSM | 2Nμ | 2Nμ | 2Nancμ | ||
| JANP | 0.59 [0.440–0.719] | 0.24 [0.146–0.369] | 0.09 [0.0001–0.26] |
| Reduction |
| HNSY | 0.59 [0.496–0.671] | 1.37 [1.051–1.748] | 6.06 [1.896–108.6] |
| Expansion |
| YNXS | 0.52 [0.428–0.592] | 3.59 [2.844–4.509] | 6.00 [3.660–1484] |
| Expansion |
| SCPZ | 0.54 [0.446–0.616] | 2.65 [2.028–3.441] | 4.04 [2.813–14.21] | 0.00 [0.0004–2.72] | Expansion |
| SCCA | 0.52 [0.440–0.598] | 3.16 [2.879–4.532] | 5.86 [0.00001‐NA] | 3.07 [NA−848.600] | Expansion |
| SCCB | 0.44 [0.348–0.532] | 2.46 [1.913–3.176] | 5.78 [0.187–18.19] | 2.25 [0.0008–202.1] | No. sign. |
| GDSZ | 0.50 [0.409–0.587] | 2.17 [1.695–2.757] | 1.33 [0.907–1.356] | 20.61 [18.180–21.180] | Reduction |
| HNCS | 0.48 [0.383–0.562] | 2.10 [1.631–2.682] | 2.57 [1.682–3.163] | 0.70 [NA‐NA] | No. sign. |
| HNZK | 0.52 [0.434–0.606] | 1.86 [1.430–2.399] | 3.53 [0.0248 ‐ NA] |
| No. sign. |
| JSNJ | 0.58 [0.489–0.659] | 1.34 [1.012–1.744] | 5.38 [2.883–10.71] | 7.59 [5.791–19.430] | No. sign. |
|
| 0.53 [0.431–0.617] | 1.64 [1.258–2.110] | 1.08 [0.063–8.706] | 1.96 [0.0003‐NA] | No. sign. |
|
| 0.56 [0.470–0.650] | 1.22 [0.916–1.605] | 2.94 [2.380–3.639] | 2.97 [2.673–4.127] | No. sign. |
|
| 0.49 [0.389–0.575] | 1.73 [1.331–2.239] | 2.19 [2.118–4.743] | 0.06 [0.054–0.063] | Expansion |
|
| 0.54 [0.447–0.631] | 1.30 [0.980–1.701] | 0.60 [0.471–0.671] | 0.23 [0.210–0.302] | Expansion |
|
| 0.51 [0.410–0.598] | 1.74 [1.331–2.249] | 6.37 [5.567–7.163] |
| Expansion |
95% of coverage confidence interval are provided in bracket; pGSM, parameter for GSM model of microsatellite mutation; 2Nμ, the current effective population size scaled by mutation rate; 2Nancμ, ancestral effective population size scaled by mutation rate; type of population size variation was determined by overlap of 95% of coverage confidence interval between 2Nμ and 2Nancμ estimated by OnePopVarSize model. The bolded and underlined numbers show confidence estimation from OnePopVarSize model determined based on differences between estimation of 2Nμ by two models and confidence intervals of estimated 2Nancμ. Five populations collected from greenhouses are underlined. NA, indicates the value is either extremely low or high.
Figure 3RDA analysis on genetic variance explained by the environmental effects of climate and habitat. A full RDA model was run by considering environmental and geographic effects simultaneously (a), and a partial RDA model was run by constraining geographic effects to analyze the correlation of environmental variables (b). Individuals from the same population are indicated by circles with the same color. PCNM2‐5, geographic variables; bio3, isothermality; bio5, maximum temperature of warmest month; bio8, mean temperature of wettest quarter; bio15, precipitation seasonality; bio18, precipitation of warmest quarter; habitat, samples collected from greenhouse or field. Correlations of each variable are indicated by an arrow. Long arrows indicate a high correlation between the variable and genetic distance