OBJECTIVES: Retinoblastoma is the most common primary intraocular tumor of childhood with >95% survival rates in the US. Traditional therapy for retinoblastoma often included enucleation (removal of the eye). While much is known about the visual, physical, and cognitive ramifications of enucleation, data are lacking about survivors' perception of how this treatment impacts overall quality of life. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of an open-ended response describing how much the removal of an eye had affected retinoblastoma survivors' lives and in what ways in free text, narrative form. RESULTS: Four hundred and four retinoblastoma survivors who had undergone enucleation (bilateral disease = 214; 52% female; mean age = 44, SD = 11) completed the survey. Survivors reported physical problems (n = 205, 50.7%), intrapersonal problems (n = 77, 19.1%), social and relational problems (n = 98, 24.3%), and affective problems (n = 34, 8.4%) at a mean of 42 years after diagnosis. Three key themes emerged from survivors' responses; specifically, they (1) continue to report physical and intrapersonal struggles with appearance and related self-consciousness due to appearance; (2) have multiple social and relational problems, with teasing and bullying being prominent problems; and (3) reported utilization of active coping strategies, including developing more acceptance and learning compensatory skills around activities of daily living. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: This study suggests that adult retinoblastoma survivors treated with enucleation continue to struggle with a unique set of psychosocial problems. Future interventions can be designed to teach survivors more active coping skills (e.g., for appearance-related issues, vision-related issues, and teasing/bullying) to optimize survivors' long-term quality of life.
OBJECTIVES:Retinoblastoma is the most common primary intraocular tumor of childhood with >95% survival rates in the US. Traditional therapy for retinoblastoma often included enucleation (removal of the eye). While much is known about the visual, physical, and cognitive ramifications of enucleation, data are lacking about survivors' perception of how this treatment impacts overall quality of life. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of an open-ended response describing how much the removal of an eye had affected retinoblastoma survivors' lives and in what ways in free text, narrative form. RESULTS: Four hundred and four retinoblastoma survivors who had undergone enucleation (bilateral disease = 214; 52% female; mean age = 44, SD = 11) completed the survey. Survivors reported physical problems (n = 205, 50.7%), intrapersonal problems (n = 77, 19.1%), social and relational problems (n = 98, 24.3%), and affective problems (n = 34, 8.4%) at a mean of 42 years after diagnosis. Three key themes emerged from survivors' responses; specifically, they (1) continue to report physical and intrapersonal struggles with appearance and related self-consciousness due to appearance; (2) have multiple social and relational problems, with teasing and bullying being prominent problems; and (3) reported utilization of active coping strategies, including developing more acceptance and learning compensatory skills around activities of daily living. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: This study suggests that adult retinoblastoma survivors treated with enucleation continue to struggle with a unique set of psychosocial problems. Future interventions can be designed to teach survivors more active coping skills (e.g., for appearance-related issues, vision-related issues, and teasing/bullying) to optimize survivors' long-term quality of life.
Entities:
Keywords:
Common sense model; Coping strategies; Enucleation; Illness representation; Retinoblastoma
Authors: Daphne L Mourits; Dyonne T Hartong; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Machteld I Bosscha; H Stevie Tan; Annette C Moll Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: Ovidiu Popa-Velea; Liliana Diaconescu; Mara Jidveian Popescu; Carmen Truţescu Journal: Int J Psychiatry Med Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 1.210
Authors: Chu-Ling Yu; Margaret A Tucker; David H Abramson; Kyoji Furukawa; Johanna M Seddon; Marilyn Stovall; Joseph F Fraumeni; Ruth A Kleinerman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Jennifer van Dijk; Jaap Huisman; Annette C Moll; Antoinette Y N Schouten-van Meeteren; Pieter D Bezemer; Peter J Ringens; Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis; Saskia M Imhof Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2007-12-03 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Victoria W Willard; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Haitao Pan; Chia-Wei Hsu; Rachel C Brennan; Matthew W Wilson; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Kristin Goode; Kendra Parris; Sean Phipps Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Pernille Axel Gregersen; Mikkel Funding; Jan Alsner; Maja H Olsen; Jens Overgaard; Steen F Urbak; Sandra E Staffieri; Stina Lou Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2021-09-12