BACKGROUND: A walking cadence of ≥100 steps/min corresponds to minimally moderate intensity, absolutely defined as ≥3 metabolic equivalents (METs). This threshold has primarily been calibrated during treadmill walking. There is a need to determine the classification accuracy of this cadence threshold to predict intensity during overground walking. METHODS: In this laboratory-based cross-sectional investigation, participants (N = 75, 49.3% women, age 21-40 y) performed a single 5-minute overground (hallway) walking trial at a self-selected preferred pace. Steps accumulated during each trial were hand tallied and converted to cadence (steps/min). Oxygen uptake was measured using indirect calorimetry and converted to METs. The classification accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, and positive predictive value) of ≥100 steps/min to predict ≥3 METs was calculated. RESULTS: A cadence threshold of ≥100 steps/min yielded an overall accuracy (combined sensitivity and specificity) of 73.3% for predicting minimally moderate intensity. Moreover, for individuals walking at a cadence ≥100 steps/min, the probability (positive predictive value) of achieving minimally moderate intensity was 80.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Although primarily developed using treadmill-based protocols, a cadence threshold of ≥100 steps/min for young adults appears to be a valid heuristic value (evidence-based, rounded, practical) associated with minimally moderate intensity during overground walking performed at a self-selected preferred pace.
BACKGROUND: A walking cadence of ≥100 steps/min corresponds to minimally moderate intensity, absolutely defined as ≥3 metabolic equivalents (METs). This threshold has primarily been calibrated during treadmill walking. There is a need to determine the classification accuracy of this cadence threshold to predict intensity during overground walking. METHODS: In this laboratory-based cross-sectional investigation, participants (N = 75, 49.3% women, age 21-40 y) performed a single 5-minute overground (hallway) walking trial at a self-selected preferred pace. Steps accumulated during each trial were hand tallied and converted to cadence (steps/min). Oxygen uptake was measured using indirect calorimetry and converted to METs. The classification accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, and positive predictive value) of ≥100 steps/min to predict ≥3 METs was calculated. RESULTS: A cadence threshold of ≥100 steps/min yielded an overall accuracy (combined sensitivity and specificity) of 73.3% for predicting minimally moderate intensity. Moreover, for individuals walking at a cadence ≥100 steps/min, the probability (positive predictive value) of achieving minimally moderate intensity was 80.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Although primarily developed using treadmill-based protocols, a cadence threshold of ≥100 steps/min for young adults appears to be a valid heuristic value (evidence-based, rounded, practical) associated with minimally moderate intensity during overground walking performed at a self-selected preferred pace.
Entities:
Keywords:
accelerometry; guidelines and recommendations; pedometry; physical activity
Authors: Michael W Beets; Stamatis Agiovlasitis; Christopher A Fahs; Sushant M Ranadive; Bo Fernhall Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2010-01-21 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: Catrine Tudor-Locke; Ho Han; Elroy J Aguiar; Tiago V Barreira; John M Schuna; Minsoo Kang; David A Rowe Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Kabir P Sadarangani; Mark Hamer; Jenny S Mindell; Ngaire A Coombs; Emmanuel Stamatakis Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Catrine Tudor-Locke; Jose Mora-Gonzalez; Scott W Ducharme; Elroy J Aguiar; John M Schuna; Tiago V Barreira; Christopher C Moore; Colleen J Chase; Zachary R Gould; Marcos A Amalbert-Birriel; Stuart R Chipkin; John Staudenmayer Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 8.915
Authors: Jill P Pell; Carlos Celis-Morales; Frederick K Ho; Fanny Petermann-Rocha; Solange Parra-Soto; Jirapitcha Boonpor; Jason M R Gill; Stuart R Gray Journal: BMC Med Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 11.150
Authors: Mallory Marshall; Beth Birchfield; Rebecca Rogers; Joyeuse Senga; McKenna Persch; Madison Currie; Daphne Schmid; Christopher Ballmann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Catrine Tudor-Locke; Scott W Ducharme; Elroy J Aguiar; John M Schuna; Tiago V Barreira; Christopher C Moore; Colleen J Chase; Zachary R Gould; Marcos A Amalbert-Birriel; Jose Mora-Gonzalez; Stuart R Chipkin; John Staudenmayer Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 8.915