Literature DB >> 35876127

Classification of moderate-intensity overground walking speed in 21- to 85-year-old adults.

Peixuan Zheng1, Scott W Ducharme2, Christopher C Moore3, Catrine Tudor-Locke4, Elroy J Aguiar1.   

Abstract

The Compendium of Physical Activities reports that walking at 2.5 mph associates with absolutely-defined moderate intensity (i.e., ≥3 metabolic equivalents [METs]). However, it is unclear whether this speed threshold is accurate during overground walking and/or across the adult age-span. This study aimed to identify optimal and heuristic speed thresholds associated with 3 METs during overground walking across age groups. Healthy adults (n = 248, 21-85 years old, 49% women) performed a 5-minute self-paced overground walking trial. Speed was measured using an electronic gait mat, and oxygen uptake was measured using indirect calorimetry and converted to METs. Optimal and heuristic thresholds and classification accuracy metrics were determined and compared using ROC curve analyses. Speed thresholds (95% CIs) associated with 3 METs for the whole sample, young (21-40 years), middle-aged (41-60 years) and older-aged (61-85 years) groups were 1.29 (1.25, 1.33), 1.30 (1,26, 1,35), and 1.25 (1.21, 1.29) m/s, respectively. Overall, 3 mph and 5 km/h performed better than 2.5 mph and 4.5 km/h in balancing both sensitivity and specificity (higher Youden's Indices). Overground walking speeds associated with 3 METs were similar across age groups. A heuristic threshold of 3 mph or 5 km/h may better identify absolutely-defined moderate intensity overground walking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Walking speed; moderate intensity; physical activity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35876127      PMCID: PMC9547950          DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2022.2103622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.943


  33 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Errors in MET estimates of physical activities using 3.5 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1) as the baseline oxygen consumption.

Authors:  Sarah Kozey; Kate Lyden; John Staudenmayer; Patty Freedson
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2010-07

3.  Energy expenditure of walking at different intensities in Brazilian college women.

Authors:  Luiz Antonio Anjos; Vivian Wahrlich; Francine Moreira Bossan; Michelle Nunes Salies; Priscila Barbosa Silva
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.324

4.  Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Song Joo Lee; Joseph Hidler
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-11-29

5.  Effects of age and walking speed on coactivation and cost of walking in healthy adults.

Authors:  Daniel S Peterson; Philip E Martin
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Cadence-based Classification of Minimally Moderate Intensity During Overground Walking in 21- to 40-Year-Old Adults.

Authors:  Elroy J Aguiar; Zachary R Gould; Scott W Ducharme; Chris C Moore; Aston K McCullough; Catrine Tudor-Locke
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2019-11-06

7.  Energy expenditure of male farmers in dry and rainy seasons in Upper-Volta.

Authors:  T Brun; F Bleiberg; S Goihman
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.718

8.  Determination of preferred walking speed on treadmill may lead to high oxygen cost on treadmill walking.

Authors:  Ugur Dal; Taner Erdogan; Bora Resitoglu; Hüseyin Beydagi
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Treadmill Calibration of the Actigraph GT1M in Young-to-Middle-Aged Obese-to-Severely Obese Subjects.

Authors:  Eivind Aadland; Sigmund Alfred Anderssen
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2012-11-01

10.  Speed and duration of walking and other leisure time physical activity and the risk of heart failure: a prospective cohort study from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Authors:  Hans Askelund Saevereid; Peter Schnohr; Eva Prescott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.