Literature DB >> 9181668

Walking to health.

J N Morris1, A E Hardman.   

Abstract

Walking is a rhythmic, dynamic, aerobic activity of large skeletal muscles that confers the multifarious benefits of this with minimal adverse effects. Walking, faster than customary, and regularly in sufficient quantity into the 'training zone' of over 70% of maximal heart rate, develops and sustains physical fitness: the cardiovascular capacity and endurance (stamina) for bodily work and movement in everyday life that also provides reserves for meeting exceptional demands. Muscles of the legs, limb girdle and lower trunk are strengthened and the flexibility of their cardinal joints preserved; posture and carriage may improve. Any amount of walking, and at any pace, expends energy. Hence the potential, long term, of walking for weight control. Dynamic aerobic exercise, as in walking, enhances a multitude of bodily processes that are inherent in skeletal muscle activity, including the metabolism of high density lipoproteins and insulin/glucose dynamics. Walking is also the most common weight-bearing activity, and there are indications at all ages of an increase in related bone strength. The pleasurable and therapeutic, psychological and social dimensions of walking, whilst evident, have been surprisingly little studied. Nor has an economic assessment of the benefits and costs of walking been attempted. Walking is beneficial through engendering improved fitness and/or greater physiological activity and energy turnover. Two main modes of such action are distinguished as: (i) acute, short term effects of the exercise; and (ii) chronic, cumulative adaptations depending on habitual activity over weeks and months. Walking is often included in studies of exercise in relation to disease but it has seldom been specifically tested. There is, nevertheless, growing evidence of gains in the prevention of heart attack and reduction of total death rates, in the treatment of hypertension, intermittent claudication and musculoskeletal disorders, and in rehabilitation after heart attack and in chronic respiratory disease. Walking is the most natural activity and the only sustained dynamic aerobic exercise that is common to everyone except for the seriously disabled or very frail. No special skills or equipment are required. Walking is convenient and may be accommodated in occupational and domestic routines. It is self-regulated in intensity, duration and frequency, and, having a low ground impact, is inherently safe. Unlike so much physical activity, there is little, if any, decline in middle age. It is a year-round, readily repeatable, self-reinforcing, habit-forming activity and the main option for increasing physical activity in sedentary populations. Present levels of walking are often low. Familiar social inequalities may be evident. There are indications of a serious decline of walking in children, though further surveys of their activity, fitness and health are required. The downside relates to the incidence of fatal and non-fatal road casualties, especially among children and old people, and the deteriorating air quality due to traffic fumes which mounting evidence implicates in the several stages of respiratory disease. Walking is ideal as a gentle start-up for the sedentary, including the inactive, immobile elderly, bringing a bonus of independence and social well-being. As general policy, a gradual progression is indicated from slow, to regular pace and on to 30 minutes or more of brisk (i.e. 6.4 km/h) walking on most days. These levels should achieve the major gains of activity and health-related fitness without adverse effects. Alternatively, such targets as this can be suggested for personal motivation, clinical practice, and public health. The average middle-aged person should be able to walk 1.6 km comfortably on the level at 6.4 km/h and on a slope of 1 in 20 at 4.8 km/h, however, many cannot do so because of inactivity-induced unfitness. The physiological threshold of 'comfort' represents 70% of maximum heart rate. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9181668     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199723050-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  132 in total

1.  Self-efficacy and exercise participation in sedentary adult females.

Authors:  E McAuley; L Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb

2.  Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. The Northeast Hip Fracture Study Group.

Authors:  J A Grisso; J L Kelsey; B L Strom; G Y Chiu; G Maislin; L A O'Brien; S Hoffman; F Kaplan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Physiological aspects of exercise in weight cycling.

Authors:  W H Saris
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Training effects of long versus short bouts of exercise in healthy subjects.

Authors:  R F DeBusk; U Stenestrand; M Sheehan; W L Haskell
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Exercise and Cardiac Complications.

Authors:  B A Franklin; S N Blair; W L Haskell; P D Thompson; S P Van Camp
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Effect of exercise training on blood pressure in 70- to 79-yr-old men and women.

Authors:  C C Cononie; J E Graves; M L Pollock; M I Phillips; C Sumners; J M Hagberg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  The biological basis of aptitude: the endurance runner.

Authors:  C Williams
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci Suppl       Date:  1981

8.  Strenuous exercise, plasma fibrinogen, and factor VII activity.

Authors:  J B Connelly; J A Cooper; T W Meade
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-05

9.  A 2-km walking test for assessing the cardiorespiratory fitness of healthy adults.

Authors:  P Oja; R Laukkanen; M Pasanen; T Tyry; I Vuori
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Physical activity and mental health in the United States and Canada: evidence from four population surveys.

Authors:  T Stephens
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  138 in total

1.  Walking in (affective) circles: can short walks enhance affect?

Authors:  P Ekkekakis; E E Hall; L M VanLanduyt; S J Petruzzello
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-06

Review 2.  Accumulation of physical activity for health gains: what is the evidence?

Authors:  A E Hardman
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Effects of physical and sporting activities on balance control in elderly people.

Authors:  P P Perrin; G C Gauchard; C Perrot; C Jeandel
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  A minimum income for healthy living.

Authors:  J N Morris; A J Donkin; D Wonderling; P Wilkinson; E A Dowler
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews.

Authors:  D S Morrison; M Petticrew; H Thomson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Randomised, controlled walking trials in postmenopausal women: the minimum dose to improve aerobic fitness?

Authors:  T-M Asikainen; S Miilunpalo; P Oja; M Rinne; M Pasanen; K Uusi-Rasi; I Vuori
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 7.  Predicted health impacts of urban air quality management.

Authors:  J Mindell; M Joffe
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Active or passive journeys and low back pain in adolescents.

Authors:  Astrid N Sjolie
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Physical activity for the prevention of cognitive decline: current evidence from observational and controlled studies.

Authors:  M D Denkinger; T Nikolaus; C Denkinger; A Lukas
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 10.  The effectiveness of walking as an intervention for low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  P Hendrick; A M Te Wake; A S Tikkisetty; L Wulff; C Yap; S Milosavljevic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.