Literature DB >> 31696386

Interchromosomal effect in carriers of translocations and inversions assessed by preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR).

E Mateu-Brull1, L Rodrigo2, V Peinado2, A Mercader3, I Campos-Galindo2, F Bronet4, S García-Herrero2, M Florensa5, M Milán2, C Rubio2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Balanced carriers of structural rearrangements have an increased risk of unbalanced embryos mainly due to the production of unbalanced gametes during meiosis. Aneuploidy for other chromosomes not involved in the rearrangements has also been described. The purpose of this work is to know if the incidence of unbalanced embryos, interchromosomal effect (ICE) and clinical outcomes differ in carriers of different structural rearrangements.
METHODS: Cohort retrospective study including 359 preimplantation genetic testing cycles for structural rearrangements from 304 couples was performed. Comparative genomic hybridisation arrays were used for chromosomal analysis. The results were stratified and compared according to female age and carrier sex. The impact of different cytogenetic features of chromosomal rearrangements was evaluated.
RESULTS: In carriers of translocations, we observed a higher percentage of abnormal embryos from day 3 biopsies compared with day 5/6 biopsies and for reciprocal translocations compared with other rearrangements. We observed a high percentage of embryos with aneuploidies for chromosomes not involved in the rearrangement that could be attributed to total ICE (aneuploid balanced and unbalanced embryos). No significant differences were observed in these percentages between types of rearrangements. Pure ICE (aneuploid balanced embyos) was independent of female age only for Robertsonian translocations, and significantly increased in day 3 biopsies for all types of abnormalities. Furthermore, total ICE for carriers of Robertsonian translocations and biopsy on day 3 was independent of female age too. High ongoing pregnancy rates were observed for all studied groups, with higher pregnancy rate for male carriers.
CONCLUSION: We observed a higher percentage of abnormal embryos for reciprocal translocations. No significant differences for total ICE was found among the different types of rearrangements, with higher pure ICE only for Robertsonian translocations. There was a sex effect for clinical outcome for carriers of translocations, with higher pregnancy rate for male carriers. The higher incidence of unbalanced and aneuploid embryos should be considered for reproductive counselling in carriers of structural rearrangements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploid unbalanced embryo; Biopsy; Interchromosomal effect; PGT-SR; Structural rearrangement

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31696386      PMCID: PMC6911137          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01593-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  68 in total

1.  Sperm FISH studies in seven male carriers of Robertsonian translocation t(13;14)(q10;q10).

Authors:  E Anton; J Blanco; J Egozcue; F Vidal
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Interchromosomal effect analyses by sperm FISH: incidence and distribution among reorganization carriers.

Authors:  Ester Anton; Francesca Vidal; Joan Blanco
Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Infertile couples with Robertsonian translocations: preimplantation genetic analysis of embryos reveals chaotic cleavage divisions.

Authors:  C M Conn; J C Harper; R M Winston; J D Delhanty
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Reproductive outcomes following preimplantation genetic diagnosis using fluorescence in situ hybridization for 52 translocation carrier couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Keiichi Kato; Naoki Aoyama; Nami Kawasaki; Hiroko Hayashi; Tang Xiaohui; Takashi Abe; Tomoko Kuroda
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Preliminary analysis of numerical chromosome abnormalities in reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation preimplantation genetic diagnosis cases with 24-chromosomal analysis with an aCGH/SNP microarray.

Authors:  Yanxin Xie; Yanwen Xu; Jing Wang; Benyu Miao; Yanhong Zeng; Chenhui Ding; Jun Gao; Canquan Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Analysis of segregation patterns of quadrivalent structures and the effect on genome stability during meiosis in reciprocal translocation carriers.

Authors:  Shuo Zhang; Caixia Lei; Junping Wu; Haiyan Sun; Jing Zhou; Saijuan Zhu; Jialong Wu; Jing Fu; Yijuan Sun; Daru Lu; Xiaoxi Sun; Yueping Zhang
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Detection of aneuploidy for chromosomes 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, X and Y by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in spermatozoa from nine patients with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  M G Pang; S F Hoegerman; A J Cuticchia; S Y Moon; G F Doncel; A A Acosta; W G Kearns
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Reproductive risks for translocation carriers: cytogenetic study and analysis of pregnancy outcome in 58 families.

Authors:  G Neri; A Serra; M Campana; B Tedeschi
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1983-12

9.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) improves pregnancy outcome for translocation carriers with a history of recurrent losses.

Authors:  Jill Fischer; Pere Colls; Tomas Escudero; Santiago Munné
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Reciprocal translocations: tracing their meiotic behavior.

Authors:  Ester Anton; Francesca Vidal; Joan Blanco
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  12 in total

1.  Are ovarian responses and the number of transferable embryos different in females and partners of male balanced translocation carriers?

Authors:  Mingyue Liu; Zhiqin Bu; Yan Liu; Jinhao Liu; Shanjun Dai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  Analysis of clinical outcomes and meiotic segregation modes following preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements using aCGH/NGS in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement.

Authors:  Tatsuya Nakano; Michiko Ammae; Manabu Satoh; Satoshi Mizuno; Yoshiharu Nakaoka; Yoshiharu Morimoto
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-29

Review 3.  The Interchromosomal Effect: Different Meanings for Different Organisms.

Authors:  Danny E Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Investigation of the interchromosomal effects in male carriers with structural chromosomal abnormalities using FISH.

Authors:  Özgür Balasar; Hasan Acar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-03-14

5.  Blastocyst conversion rate and ploidy in patients with structural rearrangements.

Authors:  Iris G Insogna; A Lanes; L Dobson; E S Ginsburg; C Racowsky; E Yanushpolsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  PGT-SR: the red-herring and the siren; interchromosomal effect and screening for unrelated aneuploidy.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  A Rapid NGS-Based Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities in Day-3 Blastomere Biopsy Allows Embryo Transfer Within the Same Treatment Cycle.

Authors:  Yinghui Ye; Jieliang Ma; Long Cui; Sijia Lu; Fan Jin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  The impact of patient, embryo, and translocation characteristics on the ploidy status of young couples undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) by next generation sequencing (NGS).

Authors:  Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin; Meral Gultomruk; Niyazi Emre Turgut; Carmen Rubio; Lorena Rodrigo; Zalihe Yarkiner; Selen Ecemis; Guvenc Karlikaya; Necati Findikli; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  In vitro fertilization outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements comparing fluorescence in-situ hybridization, microarray comparative genomic hybridization, and next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Chantal B Bartels; Reeva Makhijani; Prachi Godiwala; Alison Bartolucci; John C Nulsen; Daniel R Grow; Lawrence Engmann; Claudio A Benadiva
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-25

10.  Analysis of the Number of Euploid Embryos in Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles With Early-Follicular Phase Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Long Protocol.

Authors:  Gang Li; Yifang Wu; Wenbin Niu; Jiawei Xu; Linli Hu; Hao Shi; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.