Literature DB >> 28921398

Preliminary analysis of numerical chromosome abnormalities in reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation preimplantation genetic diagnosis cases with 24-chromosomal analysis with an aCGH/SNP microarray.

Yanxin Xie1,2,3, Yanwen Xu1,2, Jing Wang1,2, Benyu Miao1,2, Yanhong Zeng1,2, Chenhui Ding1,2, Jun Gao1,2, Canquan Zhou4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether an interchromosomal effect (ICE) occurred in embryos obtained from reciprocal translocation (rcp) and Robertsonian translocation (RT) carriers who were following a preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) with whole chromosome screening with an aCGH and SNP microarray. We also analyzed the chromosomal numerical abnormalities in embryos with aneuploidy in parental chromosomes that were not involved with a translocation and balanced in involved parental translocation chromosomes.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 832 embryos obtained from rcp carriers and 382 embryos from RT carriers that were biopsied in 139 PGD cycles. The control group involved embryos obtained from age-matched patient karyotypes who were undergoing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with non-translocation, and 579 embryos were analyzed in the control group. A single blastomere at the cleavage stage or trophectoderm from a blastocyst was biopsied, and 24-chromosomal analysis with an aCGH/SNP microarray was conducted using the PGD/PGS protocols. Statistical analyses were implemented on the incidences of cumulative aneuploidy rates between the translocation carriers and the control group.
RESULTS: Reliable results were obtained from 138 couples, among whom only one patient was a balanced rcp or RT translocation carrier, undergoing PGD testing in our center from January 2012 to June 2014. For day 3 embryos, the aneuploidy rates were 50.7% for rcp carriers and 49.1% for RT carriers, compared with the control group, with 44.8% at a maternal age < 36 years. When the maternal age was ≥ 36 years, the aneuploidy rates were increased to 61.1% for rcp carriers, 56.7% for RT carriers, and 60.3% for the control group. There were no significant differences. In day 5 embryos, the aneuploidy rates were 24.5% for rcp carriers and 34.9% for RT carriers, compared with the control group with 53.6% at a maternal age < 36 years. When the maternal age was ≥ 36 years, the aneuploidy rates were 10.7% for rcp carriers, 26.3% for RT carriers, and 57.1% for the control group. The cumulative aneuploidy rates of chromosome translocation carriers were significantly lower than the control group. No ICE was observed in cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos obtained from these carriers. Additionally, the risk of chromosomal numerical abnormalities was observed in each of the 23 pairs of autosomes or sex chromosomes from day 3 and day 5 embryos.
CONCLUSION: There was not enough evidence to prove that ICE was present in embryos derived from both rcp and RT translocation carriers, regardless of the maternal age. However, chromosomal numerical abnormalities were noticed in 23 pairs of autosomes and sex chromosomes in parental structurally normal chromosomes. Thus, 24-chromosomal analysis with an aCGH/SNP microarray PGD protocol is required to decrease the risks of failure to diagnose aneuploidy in structurally normal chromosomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Array CGH; Interchromosomal effect; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Reciprocal translocation; Robertsonian translocation; SNP

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28921398      PMCID: PMC5758468          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-1045-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  39 in total

1.  Cooperation of selection and meiotic mechanisms in the production of imbalances in reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  T Faraut; M A Mermet; J Demongeot; O Cohen
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  2000

2.  The paternal effect of chromosome translocation carriers observed from meiotic segregation in embryos.

Authors:  Belén Lledó; José A Ortiz; Ruth Morales; Jorge Ten; Pedro E de la Fuente; Carlos García-Ochoa; Rafael Bernabeu
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Genetic diseases and aneuploidies can be detected with a single blastocyst biopsy: a successful clinical approach.

Authors:  Maria Giulia Minasi; Francesco Fiorentino; Alessandra Ruberti; Anil Biricik; Elisabetta Cursio; Ettore Cotroneo; Maria Teresa Varricchio; Matteo Surdo; Francesca Spinella; Ermanno Greco
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  [Clinical analysis of 100 preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles].

Authors:  Yan-wen Xu; Can-quan Zhou; Yan-hong Zeng; Ying Liu; Ling Gao; Guang-lun Zhuang
Journal:  Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2011-04

5.  Sperm and embryo analysis of similar t(7;10) translocations transmitted in two families.

Authors:  Miluse Vozdova; Eva Oracova; Petra Musilova; Katerina Kasikova; Petra Prinosilova; Renata Gaillyova; Jiri Rubes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  [Clinical investigation to compare aCGH and FISH in preimplantationgenetic diagnosis of chromosome translocation carriers].

Authors:  Yanxin Xie; Yanwen Xu; Benyu Miao; Yanhong Zeng; Jing Wang; Canquan Zhou
Journal:  Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2014-03

7.  First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis.

Authors:  S Alfarawati; E Fragouli; P Colls; D Wells
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Kyle J Tobler; Paul R Brezina; Andrew T Benner; Luke Du; Xin Xu; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Assessment of aneuploidy for chromosomes 8, 9, 13, 16, and 21 in human sperm by using primed in situ labeling technique.

Authors:  F Pellestor; A Girardet; L Coignet; B Andréo; J P Charlieu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis is likely to improve the clinical outcome for translocation carriers.

Authors:  Y-Q Tan; K Tan; S-P Zhang; F Gong; D-H Cheng; B Xiong; C-F Lu; X-C Tang; K-L Luo; G Lin; G-X Lu
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  7 in total

1.  Interchromosomal effect in carriers of translocations and inversions assessed by preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR).

Authors:  E Mateu-Brull; L Rodrigo; V Peinado; A Mercader; I Campos-Galindo; F Bronet; S García-Herrero; M Florensa; M Milán; C Rubio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Chromosomal segregation in sperm of the Robertsonian translocation (21;22) carrier and its impact on IVF outcome.

Authors:  Sanja Vujisic; Petra Korac; Mirjana Pavlica; Nebojsa Vujnovic; Romana Dmitrovic
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  A mathematical model for predicting the number of transferable blastocysts in next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Yunni Cai; Min Ding; YuTing Zhang; Yanxin Sun; Fei Lin; Zhenyu Diao; Jianjun Zhou
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Meiotic Heterogeneity of Trivalent Structure and Interchromosomal Effect in Blastocysts With Robertsonian Translocations.

Authors:  Shuo Zhang; Caixia Lei; Junping Wu; Jing Zhou; Min Xiao; Saijuan Zhu; Yanping Xi; Jing Fu; Yijuan Sun; Congjian Xu; Xiaoxi Sun
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Successful birth after preimplantation genetic testing for a couple with two different reciprocal translocations and review of the literature.

Authors:  Dun Liu; Chuangqi Chen; Xiqian Zhang; Mei Dong; Tianwen He; Yunqiao Dong; Jian Lu; Lihua Yu; Chuanchun Yang; Fenghua Liu
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Exploration of the interchromosomal effects in preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements based on next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Junmei Fan; Xueluo Zhang; Yanhua Chen; Junkun Zhang; Lei Zhang; Xingyu Bi; Jinbao Wang; Xiang Huang; Meiqin Yan; Xueqing Wu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.473

7.  A comprehensive and universal approach for embryo testing in patients with different genetic disorders.

Authors:  Shuo Zhang; Caixia Lei; Junping Wu; Min Xiao; Jing Zhou; Saijuan Zhu; Jing Fu; Daru Lu; Xiaoxi Sun; Congjian Xu
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2021-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.