Literature DB >> 18813133

Reciprocal translocations: tracing their meiotic behavior.

Ester Anton1, Francesca Vidal, Joan Blanco.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Segregation and interchromosomal effect studies have been performed in reciprocal translocation carriers by sperm-fluorescent in situ hybridization reporting a great heterogeneity. The divergences have been attributed to the particular cytogenetic characteristics of each rearrangement. Nevertheless, there is no consensus in the factors that are responsible for such variability. The purpose of this study was to determine which cytogenetic features influence in the segregation and interchromosomal effect outcome.
METHODS: Segregation and interchromosomal effects analyses were performed in 14 reciprocal translocation carriers, selected because they presented very different cytogenetic features regarding the tetravalent pairing geometry. In each segregation study, a customized combination of probes was used to identify all the segregation products. In the interchromosomal effect study, we used a triple-color fluorescent in situ hybridization for chromosomes X, Y, and 18.
RESULTS: A preferential segregation pattern with a gradually decreasing production of Alternate, Adjacent I, Adjacent II, and 3:1 segregation was observed in the segregation analysis. Some specific features have been observed to influence this distribution: size of the translocated and centric segments and the presence of centromeres from acrocentric chromosomes in the center of the cross. Aneuploidy/diploidy screening revealed increased frequencies of numerical anomalies in seven carriers.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that reciprocal translocations display a more homogeneous behavior than described in the literature. The interchromosomal effects represent an additional source of imbalances in these carriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18813133     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318187760f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  17 in total

1.  PGD management scheme for older females with balanced translocations: Do older females have less chance of balanced embryo transfer?

Authors:  Pinar Tulay; Meral Gültomruk; Necati Fındıklı; Mustafa Bahçeci
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-01-12

2.  Reproductive outcomes following preimplantation genetic diagnosis using fluorescence in situ hybridization for 52 translocation carrier couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Keiichi Kato; Naoki Aoyama; Nami Kawasaki; Hiroko Hayashi; Tang Xiaohui; Takashi Abe; Tomoko Kuroda
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Interchromosomal effect in carriers of translocations and inversions assessed by preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR).

Authors:  E Mateu-Brull; L Rodrigo; V Peinado; A Mercader; I Campos-Galindo; F Bronet; S García-Herrero; M Florensa; M Milán; C Rubio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Preliminary analysis of numerical chromosome abnormalities in reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation preimplantation genetic diagnosis cases with 24-chromosomal analysis with an aCGH/SNP microarray.

Authors:  Yanxin Xie; Yanwen Xu; Jing Wang; Benyu Miao; Yanhong Zeng; Chenhui Ding; Jun Gao; Canquan Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Risk Factors Affecting Alternate Segregation in Blastocysts From Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles of Autosomal Reciprocal Translocations.

Authors:  Pingyuan Xie; Liang Hu; Yangqin Peng; Yue-Qiu Tan; Keli Luo; Fei Gong; Guangxiu Lu; Ge Lin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Causative Mutations and Mechanism of Androgenetic Hydatidiform Moles.

Authors:  Ngoc Minh Phuong Nguyen; Zhao-Jia Ge; Ramesh Reddy; Somayyeh Fahiminiya; Philippe Sauthier; Rashmi Bagga; Feride Iffet Sahin; Sangeetha Mahadevan; Matthew Osmond; Magali Breguet; Kurosh Rahimi; Louise Lapensee; Karine Hovanes; Radhika Srinivasan; Ignatia B Van den Veyver; Trilochan Sahoo; Asangla Ao; Jacek Majewski; Teruko Taketo; Rima Slim
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  The impact of patient, embryo, and translocation characteristics on the ploidy status of young couples undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) by next generation sequencing (NGS).

Authors:  Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin; Meral Gultomruk; Niyazi Emre Turgut; Carmen Rubio; Lorena Rodrigo; Zalihe Yarkiner; Selen Ecemis; Guvenc Karlikaya; Necati Findikli; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Embryos of robertsonian translocation carriers exhibit a mitotic interchromosomal effect that enhances genetic instability during early development.

Authors:  Samer Alfarawati; Elpida Fragouli; Pere Colls; Dagan Wells
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.020

9.  Can Characteristics of Reciprocal Translocations Predict the Chance of Transferable Embryos in PGD Cycles?

Authors:  Elsbeth Dul; Jannie van Echten-Arends; Henk Groen; Peter Kastrop; Lucie Amory-van Wissen; John Engelen; Jolande Land; Edith Coonen; Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Cytogenetic and molecular analyses of de novo translocation dic(9;13)(p11.2;p12) in an infertile male.

Authors:  Ewa Wiland; Marta Olszewska; Andrew Georgiadis; Nataliya Huleyuk; Barbara Panasiuk; Danuta Zastavna; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Piotr Jedrzejczak; Alina T Midro; Alexander N Yatsenko; Maciej Kurpisz
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.