Literature DB >> 7243215

Evaluation of clinical stereoacuity tests.

W R Marsh, S C Rawlings, J V Mumma.   

Abstract

Sixty children ages two to seven were separated into two age-matched groups of thirty each, one consisting of a group of normal children, and the other a strabismic-anisometropic group. All subjects were examined with four currently available stereoacuity tests, the RDE, Randot, Titmus, and the TNO. Significant differences in performance were found between the two groups. Across all tests there was a 10 to 17% over-referral rate and a 33-37% under-referral rate. Untestability in the normal group ranged from 3.3-6.7% across tests, while in the patient group it ranged from 3.3-20.0%. The under-referral rate is unacceptable and casts doubt on the value of our present stereoacuity tests in screening for subtle defects in binocular function in the young child.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7243215     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35096-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  7 in total

1.  Intraexaminer repeatability and agreement in stereoacuity measurements made in young adults.

Authors:  Beatriz Antona; Ana Barrio; Isabel Sanchez; Enrique Gonzalez; Guadalupe Gonzalez
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Validation of dynamic random dot stereotests in pediatric vision screening.

Authors:  Anna Budai; András Czigler; Eszter Mikó-Baráth; Vanda A Nemes; Gábor Horváth; Ágota Pusztai; David P Piñero; Gábor Jandó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Horizontal Lang two-pencil test as a screening test for stereopsis and binocularity.

Authors:  Monisha E Nongpiur; Pradeep Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Stereotest artifacts and the strabismus patient.

Authors:  S M Archer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Stereo tests as a screening tool for strabismus: which is the best choice?

Authors:  Chiara Ancona; Monica Stoppani; Veronica Odazio; Carlo La Spina; Giulia Corradetti; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-12

6.  Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity.

Authors:  Yo Iwata; Fusako Fujimura; Tomoya Handa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Hitoshi Ishikawa
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Stereopsis in Early Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Mohadeceh Faraji; Haleh Kangari; Alireza Majidi; Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaee
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2020-01-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.