Literature DB >> 27799586

Modified Test Protocol Improves Sensitivity of the Stereo Fly Test.

Angie De La Cruz1, Sarah E Morale1, Reed M Jost1, Krista R Kelly1, Eileen E Birch2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Stereoacuity measurement is a common element of pediatric ophthalmic examinations. Although the Stereo Fly Test is routinely used to establish the presence of coarse stereopsis (3000 arcsecs), it often yields a false negative "pass" due to learned responses and non-stereoscopic cues. We developed and evaluated a modified Stereo Fly Test protocol aimed at increasing sensitivity, thus reducing false negatives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Stereo Fly Test was administered according to manufacturer instructions to 321 children aged 3-12 years. Children with a "pass" outcome (n = 147) were re-tested wearing glasses fitted with polarizers of matching orientation for both eyes to verify that they were responding to stereoscopic cues (modified protocol). The response to the standard Stereo Fly Test was considered a false negative (pass) if the child still pinched above the plate after disparity cues were eliminated. Randot® Preschool Stereoacuity and Butterfly Tests were used as gold standards. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity was 81% (95% CI: 0.75 - 0.86) for standard administration of the Stereo Fly Test (19% false negative "pass"). The modified protocol increased sensitivity to 90% (95% CI: 0.85 - 0.94). The modified two-step protocol is a simple and convenient way to administer the Stereo Fly Test with increased sensitivity in a clinical setting.
© 2016 Board of regents of the University of Wisconsin System, American Orthoptic Journal, Volume 66, 2016, ISSN 0065-955X, E-ISSN 1553-4448.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amblyopia; anisometropia; stereoacuity; strabismus

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27799586      PMCID: PMC6051409          DOI: 10.3368/aoj.66.1.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Orthopt J        ISSN: 0065-955X


  5 in total

1.  Modification of the titmus fly test to improve accuracy.

Authors:  Kyle Arnoldi; Alla Frenkel
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  2014

2.  [The Titmus Fly Test--evaluation of subjective depth perception with a simple finger pointing trial. Clinical study of 73 patients and probands].

Authors:  H Hasche; R Gockeln; W de Decker
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 0.700

3.  Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot preschool stereoacuity test.

Authors:  S L Fawcett; E E Birch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders.

Authors:  Sherry L Fawcett; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Stereotest artifacts and the strabismus patient.

Authors:  S M Archer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Binocular non-stereoscopic cues can deceive clinical tests of stereopsis.

Authors:  Adrien Chopin; Samantha Wenyan Chan; Bahia Guellai; Daphné Bavelier; Dennis Michael Levi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth?

Authors:  Anna R O'Connor; Laurence P Tidbury
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  The difference of distance stereoacuity measured with different separating methods.

Authors:  Lingzhi Zhao; Yu Zhang; Huang Wu; Jun Xiao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.