| Literature DB >> 31694541 |
Jianzhi Shi1,2, Wenlei Wang1,2, Yinghui Lin1,2, Kai Xu1,2, Yan Xu1,2, Dehua Ji1,2, Changsheng Chen1,2, Chaotian Xie3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pyropia haitanensis, distributes in the intertidal zone, can tolerate water losses exceeding 90%. However, the mechanisms enabling P. haitanensis to survive harsh conditions remain uncharacterized. To elucidate the mechanism underlying P. haitanensis desiccation tolerance, we completed an integrated analysis of its transcriptome and proteome as well as transgenic Chlamydomonas reinhardtii carrying a P. haitanensis gene.Entities:
Keywords: Desiccation tolerance; Integrative omics analysis; Pyropia haitanensis; Transgenic experiment; Transketolase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31694541 PMCID: PMC6836531 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-2076-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Wild Pyropia haitanensis exposed to severe desiccation stress conditions at low tide (a). Fishermen regularly use buoys to lift P. haitanensis nets above the sea water level to ensure thalli lose water to eliminate wild algae and pathogenic bacteria (b)
Fig. 2Principal component analysis of Pyropia haitanensis transcriptome (a) and proteome (b) data under desiccation stress. Circles with the same color represent the biological replicates for each treatment. 0%: control; 30%: 30% water loss rate; 60%: 60% water loss rate; 90%: 90% water loss rate; R: rehydration for 2 h
Fig. 3Numbers of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (a) and a Venn diagram of the DEGs (b). Number of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) (c) and a Venn diagram of the DEPs (d). 0%: control; 30%: 30% water loss rate; 60%: 60% water loss rate; 90%: 90% water loss rate; R: rehydration for 2 h
Fig. 4Functional classification of 216 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in Pyropia haitanensis
Fig. 5Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in Pyropia haitanensis with similar functions under desiccation conditions and after rehydration. The protein categories were as follows: protein synthesis and degradation, carbohydrate and energy metabolism, responses to stimuli, cell wall and cytoskeleton, and photosynthesis. 0: control; 30: 30% water loss rate; 60: 60% water loss rate; 90: 90% water loss rate; R: rehydration for 2 h
Fig. 6Verification of differentially expressed proteins in Pyropia haitanensis under desiccation conditions based on multiple reaction monitoring. 0%: control; 30%: 30% water loss rate; 60%: 60% water loss rate; 90%: 90% water loss rate; R: rehydration for 2 h. The relative changes are shown as log2 fold change
Differentially expressed genes that changed in accordance with their homologous differentially expressed proteins
| Gene ID | (log2 FC) | Proteins | Annotation | Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30%_VS_0% | ||||
| c12879_g1 | 2.13 | 0.72 | Transketolase | Pentose phosphate pathway |
| c10632_g1 | 4.83 | 0.32 | Hypothetical protein | Hypothetical or unknown |
| c13641_g2 | 2.09 | 0.39 | Heme oxygenase | ROS scavenging |
| 60%_VS_0% | ||||
| c12879_g1 | 5.40 | 1.06 | Transketolase | Pentose phosphate pathway |
| c13777_g1 | 4.50 | 0.53 | Myo-inositol dehydrogenase | Inositol metabolism |
| c12790_g1 | 4.28 | 0.71 | Phosphoribulokinase | Calvin cycle |
| c10632_g1 | 8.22 | 0.38 | Hypothetical protein | Hypothetical or unknown |
| c13780_g20 | 1.46 | 0.50 | Glycosyl transferase | Secondary metabolism |
| c12732_g3 | 3.09 | 0.84 | Proton Gradient Regulation 5 | Photosynthetic electron transport |
| c24990_g1 | 2.43 | 0.53 | Unnamed protein product | Hypothetical or unknown |
| c10780_g1 | 1.42 | 0.72 | Ferredoxin | Photosynthetic electron transport |
| c13180_g3 | −2.24 | − 0.27 | Molecular chaperone DnaK | Molecular chaperone |
| c11346_g1 | −1.00 | −0.57 | Chaperonin GroEL | Molecular chaperone |
| c1535_g1 | −2.46 | −0.51 | Unnamed protein product | Hypothetical or unknown |
| c9789_g1 | −1.13 | −0.43 | Putative protein disulfide-isomerase | Protein processing |
| c13728_g2 | −1.95 | −0.86 | Hypothetical protein | Hypothetical or unknown |
| c12496_g2 | −3.06 | −0.37 | Pyrophosphate--fructose 6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase | Carbon metabolism |
| 90%_VS_0% | ||||
| c12879_g1 | 3.73 | 0.73 | Transketolase | Pentose phosphate pathway |
| c13133_g2 | 3.87 | 0.35 | Predicted protein | Hypothetical or unknown |
| c13777_g1 | 3.26 | 0.62 | Myo-inositol dehydrogenase | Inositol metabolism |
| c13015_g1 | 1.06 | 0.47 | Probable dehydrogenase | Hypothetical or unknown |
| c11143_g1 | 3.12 | 0.79 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | Glycolysis |
| c12940_g1 | 1.21 | 0.51 | Unnamed protein product | Hypothetical or unknown |
| c14325_g1 | 1.27 | 0.39 | Ferrochelatase | Secondary metabolism |
| c13026_g1 | 1.01 | 0.62 | Unnamed protein product | Hypothetical or unknown |
| c11214_g2 | 1.42 | 0.50 | Unnamed protein product | Hypothetical or unknown |
| c12732_g3 | 1.64 | 1.30 | Proton Gradient Regulation 5 | Photosynthetic electron transport |
| c6671_g1 | 3.80 | 0.66 | Vegetative cell wall protein | Cell wall modification |
| c13180_g3 | −1.98 | −0.43 | Molecular chaperone DnaK | Molecular chaperone |
| c12337_g1 | −1.47 | −0.54 | Photosystem I subunit III | Photosynthesis |
| Rehydration_VS_0% | ||||
| c10380_g1 | 4.78 | 0.37 | Pherophorin-C2 protein | Cell wall modification |
| c12790_g1 | 1.14 | 0.55 | Phosphoribulokinase | Calvin cycle |
| c12337_g1 | −3.33 | −0.29 | Photosystem I subunit III | Photosynthesis |
| c13612_g4 | −3.97 | −0.44 | Uncharacterized protein | Hypothetical or unknown |
Fig. 7Phylogenetic relationships of transketolase from Pyropia haitanensis and representative Cyanophyta, Chlorophyta, Phaeophyta, and land plant species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum-likelihood method. Bootstrap values after maximum-likelihood analysis and posterior probabilities after the Bayesian analysis are indicated in the nodes and branches, respectively
Fig. 8Effects of PhTKL on transgenic Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. (A) Relative PhTKL expression level under osmotic stress conditions; *significant difference (p < 0.05), **highly significant difference (p < 0.01). (B) Growth of transgenic C. reinhardtii (T5) and wild type (WT) cells under osmotic stress conditions
Fig. 9Integrated analysis of transketolases and metabolic pathways in Pyropia haitanensis under desiccation conditions