Literature DB >> 18256053

Programmed cell death in plants: distinguishing between different modes.

Theresa J Reape1, Elizabeth M Molony, Paul F McCabe.   

Abstract

Programmed cell death (PCD) in plants is a crucial component of development and defence mechanisms. In animals, different types of cell death (apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis) have been distinguished morphologically and discussed in these morphological terms. PCD is largely used to describe the processes of apoptosis and autophagy (although some use PCD and apoptosis interchangeably) while necrosis is generally described as a chaotic and uncontrolled mode of death. In plants, the term PCD is widely used to describe most instances of death observed. At present, there is a vast array of plant cell culture models and developmental systems being studied by different research groups and it is clear from what is described in this mass of literature that, as with animals, there does not appear to be just one type of PCD in plants. It is fundamentally important to be able to distinguish between different types of cell death for several reasons. For example, it is clear that, in cell culture systems, the window of time in which 'PCD' is studied by different groups varies hugely and this can have profound effects on the interpretation of data and complicates attempts to compare different researcher's data. In addition, different types of PCD will probably have different regulators and modes of death. For this reason, in plant cell cultures an apoptotic-like PCD (AL-PCD) has been identified that is fairly rapid and results in a distinct corpse morphology which is visible 4-6 h after release of cytochrome c and other apoptogenic proteins. This type of morphology, distinct from autophagy and from necrosis, has also been observed in examples of plant development. In this review, our model system and how it is used to distinguish specifically between AL-PCD and necrosis will be discussed. The different types of PCD observed in plants will also be discussed and the importance of distinguishing between different forms of cell death will be highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18256053     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  78 in total

1.  Programmed cell death is responsible for replaceable bud senescence in chestnut (Castanea mollissima BL.).

Authors:  Guangpeng Wang; Zhihong Zhang; Dejun Kong; Qingxiang Liu; Guiling Zhao
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  PERSISTENT TAPETAL CELL1 encodes a PHD-finger protein that is required for tapetal cell death and pollen development in rice.

Authors:  Hui Li; Zheng Yuan; Gema Vizcay-Barrena; Caiyun Yang; Wanqi Liang; Jie Zong; Zoe A Wilson; Dabing Zhang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Megasporogenesis and programmed cell death in Tillandsia (Bromeliaceae).

Authors:  Alessio Papini; Stefano Mosti; Eva Milocani; Gabriele Tani; Pietro Di Falco; Luigi Brighigna
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  A View to a Kill: Markers for Developmentally Regulated Cell Death in Plants.

Authors:  Alexis Maizel
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Pre-procambial cells are niches for pluripotent and totipotent stem-like cells for organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in the peach palm: a histological study.

Authors:  Marcilio de Almeida; Cristina Vieira de Almeida; Erika Mendes Graner; Gilvano Ebling Brondani; Monita Fiori de Abreu-Tarazi
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  Programmed-cell-death hallmarks in incompatible pollen and papillar stigma cells of Olea europaea L. under free pollination.

Authors:  Irene Serrano; Serrano Irene; Salvatore Pelliccione; Pelliccione Salvatore; Adela Olmedilla; Olmedilla Adela
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.570

7.  Hypersensitivity to DNA damage in plant stem cell niches.

Authors:  Nick Fulcher; Robert Sablowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cell death patterns in Arabidopsis cells subjected to four physiological stressors indicate multiple signalling pathways and cell cycle phase specificity.

Authors:  Ranjith Pathirana; Phillip West; Duncan Hedderley; Jocelyn Eason
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.356

9.  Induction of Ced9 mediated anti-apoptosis in commercial banana cultivar Rasthali for stable resistance against Fusarium wilt.

Authors:  C Sunisha; H D Sowmya; T R Usharani; M Umesha; H R Gopalkrishna; S Sriram
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Substrate Specificity and Possible Heterologous Targets of Phytaspase, a Plant Cell Death Protease.

Authors:  Raisa A Galiullina; Paulina Kasperkiewicz; Nina V Chichkova; Aleksandra Szalek; Marina V Serebryakova; Marcin Poreba; Marcin Drag; Andrey B Vartapetian
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.