| Literature DB >> 31693691 |
Johanda Damanik1, Andre Mayza2, Andhika Rachman3, Rani Sauriasari4, Melly Kristanti5, Putri Syahida Agustina4, Alexander Randy Angianto1, Pukovisa Prawiroharjo2, Em Yunir5.
Abstract
Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is strongly associated with various complications, including cognitive impairment. Diabetic complication is related with structural and functional changes of brain. Studies investigated that homocysteine as an independent risk factor of several organ complications. This marker might have a role in pathogenesis of cognitive impairment in T2DM patients. We aimed to know the association between serum homocysteine level and cognitive impairment in middle-aged T2DM populations. The study was a cross-sectional study involving 97 T2DM patients aged <60 years old. Cognitive assessment was based on validated Indonesian version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-INA) test. Besides, serum homocysteine level (Hcy) was measured based on standard laboratory assay. Filling out the questionnaire of MoCA-INA was conducted when patients came to take the blood sample. This study used independent t-test, chi-square and multivariate logistic regression model to analyze the data. There were 47 subjects (48.5%) with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Delayed recall was the most impaired domain (94.8%). There was no significant mean difference of serum Hcy level in MCI and non-MCI group (11.99±3.27 μmol/L vs 12.36±4.07 μmol/L respectively, p = 0.62). Final model of logistic regression showed no association between serum Hcy and cognitive function after adjusting confounding variables (OR: 1.778; 95%CI: 0.69-4.54). Further investigation involving slight elderly T2DM patients with larger sample size should be conducted to confirm this finding.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31693691 PMCID: PMC6834332 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224611
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow chart of subject recruitment process.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of subjects based on cognitive function.
| Variable | Cognitive Function | |
|---|---|---|
| Impaired (n = 47) | Normal (n = 50) | |
| Age (years) | 54 (36–59) | 54 (39–59) |
| Female (n (%)) | 29 (61.7%) | 29 (60.4%) |
| Education (years) | 12 (6–18) | 13 (3–19) |
| Diabetes duration (years) | 8 (5–21) | 11 (5–26) |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 130 (110–205) | 130.5 (90–185) |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 80 (54–107) | 80 (60–100) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.54 (4.79) | 27.39 (4.25) |
| Glomerular filtration rate (ml/min) | 75.70 (35.5–114) | 81.75 (32.7–180.8) |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) | 155 (84–446) | 147 (64–390) |
| Post-prandial blood glucose (mg/dl) | 249.43 (105.17) | 204.09 (98.26) |
| HbA1C (%) | 7.7 (5.6–13.3) | 7.85 (4.8–12.9) |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 201.23 (62.97) | 202.54 (46.58) |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 46 (15–72) | 47 (23–186) |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 129.89 (51.94) | 135.06 (47.49) |
| Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 153 (71–751) | 151 63–536) |
| Homocysteine (mmol/L) | 11.99 (3.29) | 12.36 (4.07) |
| Hypertension (n (%)) | 42 (89.4%) | 38 (77.6%) |
| Dyslipidemia (n (%)) | 44 (93.6%) | 46 (93.9%) |
| Exercise (n (%)) | 9 (19.1%) | 11 (22.4%) |
| MoCA-INA score | 24 (20–25) | 27 (26–30) |
| BDI score | 7.89 (4.46) | 7.20 (3.88) |
Distribution of cognitive impairment domain based on MoCA-INA test.
| Domain | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Visuospatial/executive | 46 (47.4) |
| Naming | 10 (10.3) |
| Attention | 35 (36.1) |
| Language | 58 (59.8) |
| Abstraction | 33 (34) |
| Delayed recall | 92 (94.8) |
| Orientation | 14 (14.4) |
Serum homocysteine and cognitive function.
| Variable | Cognitive function | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impaired (n = 47) | Normal (n = 50) | ||
| Homocysteine (μmol/L) | 11.99 (3.27) | 12.36 (4.07) | 0.62 |
Significance p <0.05
Bivariate analysis of cognitive function and confounding variables.
| Variable | Category | Cognitive function | Total | OR (95%CI) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impaired | Normal | |||||
| HbA1C | Uncontrolled | 31 (66%) | 34 (68%) | 65 | 0.91 (0.39–2.12) | 0.83 |
| Controlled | 16 (34%) | 16 (32%) | 32 | |||
| Hypertension | Yes | 42 (89.4%) | 38 (76%) | 80 | 2.65 (0.85–8.22) | 0.08 |
| No | 5 (10.6%) | 12 (24%) | 17 | |||
| Dyslipidemia | Yes | 44 (93.6%) | 46 (92%) | 90 | 1.27 (0.27–6.02) | 0.75 |
| No | 3 (6.4%) | 4 (8%) | 7 | |||
| BMI | Obese | 27 (57.4%) | 37 (74%) | 64 | 0.47 (0.20–1.11) | 0.08 |
| Non-obese | 20 (42.6%) | 13 (26%) | 33 | |||
| Exercise | Irregular | 38 (80.9%) | 39 (78%) | 77 | 1.19 (0.44–3.19) | 0.72 |
| Regular | 9 (19.1%) | 11 (22%) | 20 | |||
Significance. P<0.05. BMI, body mass index; HbA1C, glycated hemoglobin; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Confounding assessment in association between homocysteine level and cognitive function.
| Model | Independent Variable | OR | CI 95% | ΔOR (%) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 Full model | Homocysteine | 1.917 | 0.726–5.061 | - | - |
| Model 2 Without hypertension | Homocysteine | 1.778 | 0.696–4.545 | 7.25% | Not confounding |
| Model 3 Without BMI | Homocysteine | 1.347 | 0.566–3.205 | 24.24% | Confounding |
BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Final model of multivariate analysis.
| Variable | B | SE | Crude OR | Adjusted OR | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | ||||
| Homocysteine | 0,57 | 0.47 | 1.91 | 0.72–5.06 | 1.77 | 0.69–4.54 | 0.22 |
| BMI | 0.91 | 0.46 | 2.82 | 1.08–7.31 | 2.49 | 0.99–6.22 | 0.05 |
Significance. P<0.05. BMI, body mass index; B, regression coefficient; SE, standard error; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.