Literature DB >> 24691815

Nonlinear logistic regression model for outcomes after endourologic procedures: a novel predictor.

Adam O Kadlec1, Samuel Ohlander, James Hotaling, Jessica Hannick, Craig Niederberger, Thomas M Turk.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design a thorough and practical nonlinear logistic regression model that can be used for outcome prediction after various forms of endourologic intervention. Input variables and outcome data from 382 renal units endourologically treated at a single institution were used to build and cross-validate an independently designed nonlinear logistic regression model. Model outcomes were stone-free status and need for a secondary procedure. The model predicted stone-free status with sensitivity 75.3% and specificity 60.4%, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 75.3% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 60.4%, with classification accuracy of 69.6%. Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) was 0.749. The model predicted the need for a secondary procedure with sensitivity 30% and specificity 98.3%, yielding a PPV of 60% and NPV of 94.2%. ROC AUC was 0.863. The model had equivalent predictive value to a traditional logistic regression model for the secondary procedure outcome. This study is proof-of-concept that a nonlinear regression model adequately predicts key clinical outcomes after shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This model holds promise for further optimization via dataset expansion, preferably with multi-institutional data, and could be developed into a predictive nomogram in the future.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24691815     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-014-0656-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  12 in total

1.  Urolithiasis in a rural Wisconsin population from 1992 to 2008: narrowing of the male-to-female ratio.

Authors:  Kristina L Penniston; Ian D McLaren; Robert T Greenlee; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Temporal trends in incidence of kidney stones among children: a 25-year population based study.

Authors:  Moira E Dwyer; Amy E Krambeck; Eric J Bergstralh; Dawn S Milliner; John C Lieske; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prediction of lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy using an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Vassilis Poulakis; Philipp Dahm; Ulrich Witzsch; Rachelle de Vries; Jochem Remplik; Eduard Becht
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  This month in Investigative Urology. Commentary on the use of neural networks in clinical urology.

Authors:  C S Niederberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Prediction of spontaneous ureteral calculous passage by an artificial neural network.

Authors:  J M Cummings; J A Boullier; S D Izenberg; D M Kitchens; R V Kothandapani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Use of a neural network to predict stone growth after shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  E K Michaels; C S Niederberger; R M Golden; B Brown; L Cho; Y Hong
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Kent Kanao; Jun Nakashima; Ken Nakagawa; Hirotaka Asakura; Akira Miyajima; Mototsugu Oya; Takashi Ohigashi; Masaru Murai
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prediction of unexpected emergency room visit after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urolithiasis - an application of artificial neural network in hospital information system.

Authors:  Chi-Cheng Sun; Polun Chang
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

9.  Can we improve the prediction of stone-free status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? A neural network or a statistical model?

Authors:  Mohamed A Gomha; Khaled Z Sheir; Saeed Showky; Mohamed Abdel-Khalek; Alaa A Mokhtar; Khaled Madbouly
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  A neurocomputational model for prostate carcinoma detection.

Authors:  Pankaj Kalra; Joanna Togami; Gaurav Bansal B S; Alan W Partin; Michael K Brawer; Richard J Babaian; Lawrence S Ross; Craig S Niederberger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Current and future applications of machine and deep learning in urology: a review of the literature on urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, and bladder and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Simon Hein; Gerd Reis; Christian Gratzke; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence (AI) in urology-Current use and future directions: An iTRUE study.

Authors:  Milap Shah; Nithesh Naik; Bhaskar K Somani; B M Zeeshan Hameed
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-05-27

Review 3.  The Ascent of Artificial Intelligence in Endourology: a Systematic Review Over the Last 2 Decades.

Authors:  B M Zeeshan Hameed; Milap Shah; Nithesh Naik; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Hadis Karimi; Patrick Rice; Peter Kronenberg; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.092

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.