Literature DB >> 29673945

Three-Dimensional Texture Analysis with Machine Learning Provides Incremental Predictive Information for Successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Kidney Stones.

Manoj Mannil1, Jochen von Spiczak1, Thomas Hermanns1, Cédric Poyet1, Hatem Alkadhi1, Christian Daniel Fankhauser2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the predictive value of 3-dimensional texture analysis of computerized tomography images for successful shock wave lithotripsy in patients with kidney stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with preoperative and postoperative computerized tomography, previously untreated kidney stones and a stone diameter of 5 to 20 mm were included in study. A total of 224, 3-dimensional texture analysis features of each kidney stone, including attenuation measured in HU and the clinical variables body mass index, initial stone size and skin to stone distance, were analyzed using 5 commonly used machine learning models. The data set was split in a ratio of 2/3 for model derivation and 1/3 for validation. Machine learning based predictions of shock wave lithotripsy success in the validation cohort were evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity and the AUC.
RESULTS: For shock wave lithotripsy success the 3 clinical variables body mass index, initial stone size and skin to stone distance showed an AUC of 0.68, 0.58 and 0.63, respectively. No predictive value was found for HU. A random forest classifier using 3, 3-dimensional texture analysis features had an AUC of 0.79. By combining these 3 features with clinical variables discriminatory accuracy improved further with an AUC of 0.85 for 3-dimensional texture analysis features and skin to stone distance, an AUC of 0.8 for 3-dimensional texture analysis features and body mass index, and an AUC of 0.81 for 3-dimensional texture analysis and stone size.
CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study indicates that the clinical variables body mass index, initial stone size and skin to stone distance show limited value to predict shock wave lithotripsy success while stone HU values were not predictive. Select 3-dimensional texture analysis features identified by machine learning provided incremental accuracy to predict the success of shock wave lithotripsy.
Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision support techniques; kidney calculi; lithotripsy; machine learning; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29673945     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

Review 1.  Current and future applications of machine and deep learning in urology: a review of the literature on urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, and bladder and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Simon Hein; Gerd Reis; Christian Gratzke; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Ureteral calculi lithotripsy for single ureteral calculi: can DNN-assisted model help preoperatively predict risk factors for sepsis?

Authors:  Mingzhen Chen; Jiannan Yang; Junlin Lu; Ziling Zhou; Kun Huang; Sihan Zhang; Guanjie Yuan; Qingpeng Zhang; Zhen Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Correlative investigation between routine clinical parameters of dual-energy computed tomography and the outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children with urolithiasis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Beiwu Tu; Jianye Jia; Lengwei Yu; Huimin Li; Dengbin Wang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-10

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Urological Diseases and Management: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  B M Zeeshan Hameed; Aiswarya V L S Dhavileswarapu; Syed Zahid Raza; Hadis Karimi; Harneet Singh Khanuja; Dasharathraj K Shetty; Sufyan Ibrahim; Milap J Shah; Nithesh Naik; Rahul Paul; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Predicting shockwave lithotripsy outcome for urolithiasis using clinical and stone computed tomography texture analysis variables.

Authors:  Helen W Cui; Mafalda D Silva; Andrew W Mills; Bernard V North; Benjamin W Turney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  The Ascent of Artificial Intelligence in Endourology: a Systematic Review Over the Last 2 Decades.

Authors:  B M Zeeshan Hameed; Milap Shah; Nithesh Naik; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Hadis Karimi; Patrick Rice; Peter Kronenberg; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Contrast between traditional and machine learning algorithms based on a urine culture predictive model: a multicenter retrospective study in patients with urinary calculi.

Authors:  Yuhui He; Panxin Peng; Wenwei Ying; Qinwei Wang; Yan Wang; Xiankui Liu; Wenhui Song; Yue Gao; Peizhe Li; Jie Wang; Weijie Zhu; Wenzhi Gao; Xiaofeng Zhou; Xuesong Li; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-02

8.  Applicability of radiomics in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis: proof of concept.

Authors:  K Martini; B Baessler; M Bogowicz; C Blüthgen; M Mannil; S Tanadini-Lang; J Schniering; B Maurer; T Frauenfelder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Prediction of burden and management of renal calculi from whole kidney radiomics: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Sanjay Saini; Mannudeep K Kalra; Fatemeh Homayounieh; Ruhani Doda Khera; Bernardo Canedo Bizzo; Shadi Ebrahimian; Andrew Primak; Bernhard Schmidt
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.