| Literature DB >> 31690318 |
Chunshuang Wu1, Jiefeng Xu1, Xiaohong Jin1,2, Qijiang Chen1,3, Zilong Li4, Mao Zhang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung injury is common in post-cardiac arrest syndrome, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mild hypothermia on lung injury after cardiac arrest in swine based on lung ultrasound.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac arrest; Lung injury; Lung ultrasound; Post-cardiac arrest syndrome; Therapeutic hypothermia
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31690318 PMCID: PMC6833209 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-019-0958-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pulm Med ISSN: 1471-2466 Impact factor: 3.317
Fig. 1Experimental pipeline and procedure. BL indicates baseline; DF, defibrillation; PC, precordial compression; PR, post resuscitation; VF, ventricular fibrillation; ETCO2, End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide; LUS, lung ultrasound score
Fig. 2Lung ultrasound scanning. 2.1. Twelve regions of the left and right chest wall in lung ultrasound scanning. PSL, parasternal line; AAL, anterior axillary line; PAL, posterior axillary line. The upper and lower portions are bounded by the midpoint of the sternum; 2.2. Lung ultrasound pattern. N normal (zero); B1 moderate (one point); B2 severe (two points); and C lung consolidation (three points)
Baseline characteristics
| Variables | TH group ( | NT group ( | Control group( | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight, kg | 36.3 ± 3.1 | 36.9 ± 2.7 | 36.2 ± 3.0 | 0.901 |
| Heart rate, beats/min | 108.6 ± 11.0 | 105.4 ± 13.4 | 104.4 ± 5.0 | 0.762 |
| Mean aortic pressure, mmHg | 113.6 ± 12.0 | 121.4 ± 12.4 | 119.8 ± 7.8 | 0.395 |
| End-tidal CO2, mmHg | 39.4 ± 3.3 | 40.1 ± 2.9 | 39.6 ± 1.7 | 0.872 |
| Core temperature, °C | 37.9 ± 0.3 | 38.0 ± 0.3 | 37.9 ± 0.4 | 0.891 |
| ROSC | 8/9 | 7/9 | 5/5 | 0.172 |
| Duration of CPR, min | 5 ± 0 | 5.6 ± 1 | _ | 0.158 |
| Number of shocks to ROSC | 1.75 ± 1.4 | 3.29 ± 2.5 | _ | 0.084 |
| Epinephrine dosage, mg | 71.5 ± 71.5 | 1025.7 ± 395.6 | _ | 0.345 |
| Prevalence of recurrent VF | 0.8 ± 1.4 | 1.7 ± 2.4 | _ | 0.762 |
TH, Therapeutic hypothermia; NT, Normothermia; ROSC, Return of sponstaneous circulation; CPR, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; VF, Ventricular fibrillation
Data are presented as mean ± SD
Fig. 3Core temperature after resuscitation. TH, therapeutic hypothermia; NT, normothermia; BL, baseline
Dynamic changes of LUS, PO2/FiO2, ELWI, PVPI in three groups after CPR
| Baseline | Post resuscitation |
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 3 h | 6 h | 12 h | 24 h | 30 h | ||||
| PO2/FiO2 | 6.195* | ||||||||
| Control | 440.0 ± 56.5 | 449.6 ± 38.4 | 443.6 ± 48.0 | 429.4 ± 39.7 | 426.6 ± 31.8 | 433.2 ± 32.7 | 439.8 ± 19.4 | ||
| NT | 438.0 ± 77.0 | 342.0 ± 44.4 | 343.7 ± 58.9 | 322.4 ± 41.1 | 332.4 ± 75.2 | 278.7 ± 94.4 | 289.3 ± 82.2 | ||
| TH | 463.0 ± 47.9 | 367.4 ± 45.2 | 385.9 ± 74.4 | 414.1 ± 51.5 | 410.8 ± 42.4 | 400.5 ± 37.5 | 378.6 ± 31.1 | ||
|
| 12.962# | 2.596† | |||||||
| ELWI | 25.348* | ||||||||
| Control | 9.2 ± 0.8 | 10.4 ± 1.1 | 10.8 ± 1.3 | 9.8 ± 1.1 | 10.2 ± 1.3 | 10.2 ± 1.6 | 10.0 ± 1.4 | ||
| NT | 9.7 ± 1.3 | 17.1 ± 3.6 | 16.7 ± 4.1 | 18.3 ± 4.3 | 20.4 ± 4.7 | 20.9 ± 3.0 | 18.4 ± 3.6 | ||
| TH | 9.5 ± 1.5 | 13.6 ± 2.4 | 17.3 ± 3.3 | 17.4 ± 3.1 | 17.4 ± 3.3 | 16.0 ± 3.6 | 13.9 ± 2.0 | ||
|
| 13.562# | 5.614† | |||||||
| PVPI | 27.906* | ||||||||
| Control | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.9 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 2.6 ± 0.6 | ||
| NT | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 4.5 ± 0.7 | 5.2 ± 1.1 | 5.9 ± 1.2 | 6.1 ± 0.8 | 6.2 ± 1.1 | 5.7 ± 0.7 | ||
| TH | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 4.7 ± 1.0 | 5.0 ± 1.1 | 4.6 ± 1.0 | 4.2 ± 0.7 | ||
|
| 27.249# | 2.657† | |||||||
| LUS | 27.115* | ||||||||
| Control | 1.0 ± 1.0 | 3.6 ± 1.3 | 3.6 ± 1.3 | 3.2 ± 1.6 | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 1.4 | 4.4 ± 2.1 | ||
| NT | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 12.3 ± 2.2 | 13.3 ± 3.5 | 14.0 ± 3.5 | 15.4 ± 5.0 | 12.4 ± 3.1 | 13.9 ± 6.4 | ||
| TH | 0.9 ± 1.0 | 7.9 ± 4.1 | 7.5 ± 2.7 | 8.8 ± 1.5 | 8.6 ± 2.1 | 8.8 ± 4.0 | 8.3 ± 3.2 | ||
|
| 23.359# | 12.000† | |||||||
Values are presented as mean ± SD
p < 0.05, versus the control group
p < 0.05, versus the NT group
*p < 0.05, with group effect
#p < 0.05, with time effect
†p < 0.05, with group & time interaction
ELWI, Extravascular lung water index; PVPI, Pulmonary vascular permeability index; LUS, Lung ultrasound score; TH, Therapeutic hypothermia; NT, Normothermia; BL, Baseline
Fig. 4a Correlation between the LUS and the PO2/FiO2. b Correlation between the LUS and the PVPI. c Correlation between the LUS and the ELWI
Fig. 5Histopathology (hematoxylin and eosin staining [H&E] 10 × 20). a Sham group. b TH group. c NT group