| Literature DB >> 31687505 |
José Antonio Folgado-Fernández1, Ana María Campón-Cerro2, José Manuel Hernández-Mogollón2.
Abstract
This work aims to highlight tourism based on gastronomy, heritage and olive oil-related activities. These activities enhance the knowledge about the product itself and its links with culture and local traditions. Olive oil tourism is based on a typical gastronomic product of internationally recognised quality. This type of tourism boosts sustainable destinations capable of introducing and promoting the consumption of local products. In addition, it favours the implementation of different activities in rural settings, such as routes through the olive groves, gastronomic markets, educational initiatives, historical events, etc. This study analyses the development of olive oil tourism in the district of La Serena in Extremadura (Spain). The study involved 208 tourists that were asked about their experience on oil tourism during their trip. The results emphasize the great potential of development that olive oil tourism can achieve in rural settings as sustainable destinations. From the results obtained, managers of rural settings with a great olive oil tradition can base their tourism strategies on the gastronomic and cultural context of this local product.Entities:
Keywords: Business; Economics; Education; Emotional image; Identity; Local food; Olive oil tourism; Overall experience; Tourism; Tourism management; Tourist loyalty
Year: 2019 PMID: 31687505 PMCID: PMC6820286 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Proposed model.
Scales used.
| Authors | Dimension | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Emotional image of the territory (EI) | (EI1) The territory of La Serena is nice | |
| Identity of the territory (IT) | (IT1) The “oleotourism” of this territory means a lot to me | |
| Overall experience (OE) | (OE1) The overall experience in this territory is positive | |
| Tourist loyalty (TL) | (TL1) I will return to the territory of La Serena | |
Socio-demographic profile of the sample group.
| Variable | Sample group (%) |
|---|---|
| Male | 53.4 |
| Female | 46.6 |
| Under 25 | 2.9 |
| 26–39 | 26 |
| 40–59 | 52.4 |
| Over 59 | 18.8 |
| Basic studies | 1.4 |
| High school education | 20.2 |
| Vocational training | 8.2 |
| University studies | 65.4 |
| Other studies | 4.8 |
Motivations.
| Motivations | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Min. | Max. | σ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (M1) Activities Olive Oil Museum | 0 | 1 | 29 | 120 | 58 | 2 | 5 | 4.13 | 0.650 |
| (M2) Visit family and friends | 9 | 130 | 46 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2.41 | 0.769 |
| (M3) Enjoy nature | 0 | 1 | 12 | 120 | 75 | 2 | 5 | 4.29 | 0.594 |
| (M4) Historical and cultural heritage | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92 | 116 | 4 | 5 | 4.56 | 0.498 |
| (M5) EVOO culture | 0 | 0 | 2 | 71 | 135 | 3 | 5 | 4.64 | 0.501 |
| (M6) Local Cuisine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 165 | 4 | 5 | 4.79 | 0.406 |
| (M7) Rest and Relaxation | 0 | 0 | 7 | 82 | 119 | 3 | 5 | 4.54 | 0.563 |
| (M8) Travel with family and friends | 0 | 2 | 15 | 42 | 149 | 2 | 5 | 4.63 | 0.662 |
| (M9) For work | 63 | 116 | 20 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1.89 | 0.798 |
| (M10) Walk the Camino de Santiago | 12 | 108 | 58 | 11 | 19 | 1 | 5 | 2.60 | 1.007 |
Loadings and weights.
| Construct | Indicators | Weights | Loadings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional image of the territory (EI) | (EI1) The territory of La Serena is nice | 0,126 | |
| (EI2) The territory of La Serena is entertaining | 0,735 | ||
| (EI3) The territory of La Serena is relaxing | 0,324 | ||
| (EI4) The territory of La Serena is exciting | -0,326 | ||
| Identity of the territory (IT) | (IT1) “Oleotourism” in La Serena means a lot to me | 0,371 | |
| (IT2) I am very attached to the EVOO of this territory | 0,227 | ||
| (IT3) No other “oleotourism” location can be compared to LS | 0,177 | ||
| (IT4) I feel involved with the EVOO of La Serena | 0,358 | ||
| (IT5) La Serena is a good place to learn about EVOO | 0,122 | ||
| (IT6) Visiting La Serena broadens my knowledge about EVOO | 0,225 | ||
| (IT7) I will not forget my experience in La Serena | 0,056 | ||
| Overall experience(OE) | (OE1) The overall experience in La Serena is positive | 0,756 | |
| (OE2) It has been worth coming to La Serena | 0,830 | ||
| (OE3) La Serena is a good place to visit | 0,792 | ||
| (OE4) La Serena has a good reputation | 0,744 | ||
| Tourist Loyalty (TL) | (TL1) I will return to La Serena | 0,766 | |
| (TL2) I will recommend visiting La Serena | 0,785 | ||
| (TL3) I will return to do activities related to EVOO | 0,808 | ||
| (TL4) I will recommend the activities related to the EVOO | 0,718 |
Cronbach's alpha, composite reliability, AVE (Average Variance Extracted).
| Dimension | Cronbach's alpha | Composite reliability | AVE1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Experience | 0,786 | 0,862 | 0,610 |
| Tourist Fidelity | 0,770 | 0,853 | 0,593 |
Effects on endogenous variables.
| Construct/Hypothesis | R2 | Direct Effect (β) | Correlation | Explained Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.329 | 32.9% | |||
| 0.573 | 0.573 | |||
| 0.353 | 35.3% | |||
| 0.336 | 0.527 | 17.51% | ||
| 0.333 | 0.526 | 17.70% | ||
| 0.428 | 42.8% | |||
| 0.654 | 0.654 |
Hypothesis support.
| Hypothesis | (β)1 | t-Value2 | Support |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.573*** | 14.35 | Yes | |
| 0.336*** | 4.6 | Yes | |
| 0.333*** | 4.1 | Yes | |
| 0.654*** | 13.6 | Yes |
1 Path Coefficient. 2 Critical t-values: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns not significant (based on t (4999), one-tailed test); t(0.05; 4999) = 1.645; t(0.01; 4999) = 2.327; t(0.001; 4999) = 3.092.
Fig. 2Graphical results of structural model assessment. Critical t-values: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns not significant (based on t(4999), one-tailed test); t(0.05; 4999) = 1.645; t(0.01; 4999) = 2.327; t(0.001; 4999) = 3.092.