| Literature DB >> 31312731 |
Francisco González Santa Cruz1, Juan Choque Tito2, Jesús Claudio Pérez-Gálvez3, Miguel Jesús Medina-Viruel4.
Abstract
Gastronomy allows tourists to discover the cultural roots of the destination, thus being one of the motivations for its choice and even becoming a fundamental factor in the analysis of the overall satisfaction of the tourist experience. This research is focused on the analysis of the gastronomic experiences of foreign tourists who visit the city of Oruro (Bolivia). The main results of this research show a segmentation of travellers on the basis of their perceptions regarding the gastronomic experiences in this city into three different groups (survivors, enjoyers, and experiencers). Additionally, the study concludes that these gastronomic experiences are highly related to the motivations that the travellers have to discover a specific destination, and that their level of satisfaction with these experiences is highly connected to the relationship that gastronomy has with the cultural heritage of the local community.Entities:
Keywords: Bolivia; Gastronomy; Industry; Motivation; Oruro; Segmentation; Tourism
Year: 2019 PMID: 31312731 PMCID: PMC6609791 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Map of Bolivia. Source: own elaboration with the software ArcGIS from data obtained from Geobolivia. Database available at http://geo.gob.bo/portal/.
Characterisation clusters from gastronomy attitude.
| Gastronomy attitude | Food clusters | H-Kruskal Wallis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survivors | Enjoyers | Experiencers | |||
| χ2 | Sig. | ||||
| How would you rate your knowledge on gastronomy? | 227.909 | <0.000 | |||
| How would you rate your interest in gastronomy? | 261.359 | <0.000 | |||
| How much has Lima's gastronomy influenced your visit to the city? | 254.592 | <0.000 | |||
Source: Own elaboration.
(*) The values in bold type present significant differences in two of three of the means clusters. To test for the significant differences between the different means the Mann-Whitney U test was applied.
Food motivational dimensions.
| Food motivational dimensions | Mean | Ranking | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excitement | Cronbach's alpha (0.824) | It is different from what I eat every day. | 3.91 | 3 |
| It excites me to taste local food in its place of origin. | 3.87 | 7 | ||
| Sensory Appeal | Cronbach's alpha (0.881) | Local gastronomy tastes good. | 3.93 | 1 |
| The taste of the dish is different from the one prepared in my region. | 3.92 | 2 | ||
| Local gastronomy looks nice. | 3.80 | 10 | ||
| Local gastronomy smells nice. | 3.58 | 16 | ||
| Cultural Experience | Cronbach's alpha (0.909) | An authentic experience. | 3.90 | 5 |
| Discover something new. | 3.88 | 6 | ||
| Increase my knowledge about different cultures. | 3.87 | 8 | ||
| Discover the taste of local food. | 3.71 | 13 | ||
| It offers a unique opportunity to understand local culture. | 3.65 | 14 | ||
| Interpersonal Relationship | Cronbach's alpha (0.907) | Enjoy pleasant moments with family and/or friends. | 3.90 | 4 |
| Give advice about gastronomical experiences to other travellers. | 3.80 | 9 | ||
| Tasting local food increases family and friendship bonds. | 3.77 | 11 | ||
| Being able to transmit my experiences with local food. | 3.72 | 12 | ||
| Health Concern | Cronbach's alpha (0.890) | Local dishes contain a great quantity of fresh produce sourced locally. | 3.64 | 15 |
| Local dishes are nourishing. | 3.55 | 17 | ||
| Local gastronomy is healthy. | 3.49 | 18 | ||
Source: Own elaboration.
Characterisation of the clusters from the average of motivational dimensions.
| Food motivational dimensions | Food clusters | H-Kruskal Wallis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survivors | Enjoyers | Experiencers | χ2 | Sig. | |
| Excitement | 71.152 | <.000 | |||
| Sensorial Appeal | 71.855 | <.000 | |||
| Cultural Experience | 90.141 | <.000 | |||
| Interpersonal Relationship | 88.773 | <.000 | |||
| Health Concern | 57.513 | <.000 | |||
(*) The values in bold type present significant differences in two of three of the means clusters. To test for the significant differences between the different means the Mann-Whitney U test was applied.
Source: Own elaboration.
Characterisation cluster from the variable food satisfaction.
| Food clusters | H-Kruskal Wallis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survivors | Enjoyers | Experiencers | χ2 | Sig. |
| 109.451 | <.000 | |||
(*) The values in bold type present significant differences in two of three of the means clusters. To test for the significant differences between the different means the Mann-Whitney U test was applied.
Source: Own elaboration.
Analysis of food satisfaction and motivational dimensions.
| Food motivational dimensions | H-Kruskal Wallis | Rho Spearman | |
|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 | Sig. | ||
| Excitement | 103.242 | <.000 | 0.52 |
| Sensorial Appeal | 116.295 | <.000 | 0.59 |
| Cultural Experience | 116.080 | <.000 | 0.57 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 117.317 | <.000 | 0.56 |
| Health Concern | 117.670 | <.000 | 0.57 |
(**)The correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (bilateral).
(*) The correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (bilateral).
Source: Own elaboration.