Literature DB >> 31686023

Inception loops discover what excites neurons most using deep predictive models.

Edgar Y Walker1,2, Fabian H Sinz3,4,5,6, Erick Cobos7,8, Taliah Muhammad7,8, Emmanouil Froudarakis7,8, Paul G Fahey7,8, Alexander S Ecker7,9,10,11, Jacob Reimer7,8, Xaq Pitkow7,8,12, Andreas S Tolias13,14,15.   

Abstract

Finding sensory stimuli that drive neurons optimally is central to understanding information processing in the brain. However, optimizing sensory input is difficult due to the predominantly nonlinear nature of sensory processing and high dimensionality of the input. We developed 'inception loops', a closed-loop experimental paradigm combining in vivo recordings from thousands of neurons with in silico nonlinear response modeling. Our end-to-end trained, deep-learning-based model predicted thousands of neuronal responses to arbitrary, new natural input with high accuracy and was used to synthesize optimal stimuli-most exciting inputs (MEIs). For mouse primary visual cortex (V1), MEIs exhibited complex spatial features that occurred frequently in natural scenes but deviated strikingly from the common notion that Gabor-like stimuli are optimal for V1. When presented back to the same neurons in vivo, MEIs drove responses significantly better than control stimuli. Inception loops represent a widely applicable technique for dissecting the neural mechanisms of sensation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31686023     DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0517-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  30 in total

1.  A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses.

Authors:  E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  Network       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.273

2.  The discharge of impulses in motor nerve fibres: Part I. Impulses in single fibres of the phrenic nerve.

Authors:  E D Adrian; D W Bronk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1928-09-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  From response to stimulus: adaptive sampling in sensory physiology.

Authors:  Jan Benda; Tim Gollisch; Christian K Machens; Andreas Vm Herz
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 4.  Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex.

Authors:  Daniel L K Yamins; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Alopex: a stochastic method for determining visual receptive fields.

Authors:  E Harth; E Tzanakou
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Deep convolutional models improve predictions of macaque V1 responses to natural images.

Authors:  Santiago A Cadena; George H Denfield; Edgar Y Walker; Leon A Gatys; Andreas S Tolias; Matthias Bethge; Alexander S Ecker
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Deep Learning Models of the Retinal Response to Natural Scenes.

Authors:  Lane T McIntosh; Niru Maheswaranathan; Aran Nayebi; Surya Ganguli; Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2016

8.  Deep neural networks rival the representation of primate IT cortex for core visual object recognition.

Authors:  Charles F Cadieu; Ha Hong; Daniel L K Yamins; Nicolas Pinto; Diego Ardila; Ethan A Solomon; Najib J Majaj; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  A large field of view two-photon mesoscope with subcellular resolution for in vivo imaging.

Authors:  Nicholas James Sofroniew; Daniel Flickinger; Jonathan King; Karel Svoboda
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Model Constrained by Visual Hierarchy Improves Prediction of Neural Responses to Natural Scenes.

Authors:  Ján Antolík; Sonja B Hofer; James A Bednar; Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  If deep learning is the answer, what is the question?

Authors:  Andrew Saxe; Stephanie Nelli; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Integrated Neurophotonics: Toward Dense Volumetric Interrogation of Brain Circuit Activity-at Depth and in Real Time.

Authors:  Laurent C Moreaux; Dimitri Yatsenko; Wesley D Sacher; Jaebin Choi; Changhyuk Lee; Nicole J Kubat; R James Cotton; Edward S Boyden; Michael Z Lin; Lin Tian; Andreas S Tolias; Joyce K S Poon; Kenneth L Shepard; Michael L Roukes
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Revisiting horizontal connectivity rules in V1: from like-to-like towards like-to-all.

Authors:  Frédéric Chavane; Laurent Udo Perrinet; James Rankin
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  State-dependent pupil dilation rapidly shifts visual feature selectivity.

Authors:  Katrin Franke; Konstantin F Willeke; Kayla Ponder; Mario Galdamez; Na Zhou; Taliah Muhammad; Saumil Patel; Emmanouil Froudarakis; Jacob Reimer; Fabian H Sinz; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  From deep learning to mechanistic understanding in neuroscience: the structure of retinal prediction.

Authors:  Hidenori Tanaka; Aran Nayebi; Niru Maheswaranathan; Lane McIntosh; Stephen A Baccus; Surya Ganguli
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2019-12

Review 6.  Improving scalability in systems neuroscience.

Authors:  Zhe Sage Chen; Bijan Pesaran
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 18.688

7.  Supporting generalization in non-human primate behavior by tapping into structural knowledge: Examples from sensorimotor mappings, inference, and decision-making.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Baptiste Caziot; Stefania Bruni; Nora E Fitzgerald; Eric Avila; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 10.885

8.  Classical-Contextual Interactions in V1 May Rely on Dendritic Computations.

Authors:  Lei Jin; Bardia F Behabadi; Monica P Jadi; Chaithanya A Ramachandra; Bartlett W Mel
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  Crossing the Cleft: Communication Challenges Between Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Frances S Chance; James B Aimone; Srideep S Musuvathy; Michael R Smith; Craig M Vineyard; Felix Wang
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 10.  The Neuroscience of Spatial Navigation and the Relationship to Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Edgar Bermudez-Contreras; Benjamin J Clark; Aaron Wilber
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.