Literature DB >> 35283616

From deep learning to mechanistic understanding in neuroscience: the structure of retinal prediction.

Hidenori Tanaka1,2, Aran Nayebi3, Niru Maheswaranathan3,4, Lane McIntosh3, Stephen A Baccus5, Surya Ganguli2,4.   

Abstract

Recently, deep feedforward neural networks have achieved considerable success in modeling biological sensory processing, in terms of reproducing the input-output map of sensory neurons. However, such models raise profound questions about the very nature of explanation in neuroscience. Are we simply replacing one complex system (a biological circuit) with another (a deep network), without understanding either? Moreover, beyond neural representations, are the deep network's computational mechanisms for generating neural responses the same as those in the brain? Without a systematic approach to extracting and understanding computational mechanisms from deep neural network models, it can be difficult both to assess the degree of utility of deep learning approaches in neuroscience, and to extract experimentally testable hypotheses from deep networks. We develop such a systematic approach by combining dimensionality reduction and modern attribution methods for determining the relative importance of interneurons for specific visual computations. We apply this approach to deep network models of the retina, revealing a conceptual understanding of how the retina acts as a predictive feature extractor that signals deviations from expectations for diverse spatiotemporal stimuli. For each stimulus, our extracted computational mechanisms are consistent with prior scientific literature, and in one case yields a new mechanistic hypothesis. Thus overall, this work not only yields insights into the computational mechanisms underlying the striking predictive capabilities of the retina, but also places the framework of deep networks as neuroscientific models on firmer theoretical foundations, by providing a new roadmap to go beyond comparing neural representations to extracting and understand computational mechanisms.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 35283616      PMCID: PMC8916592     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst        ISSN: 1049-5258


  26 in total

1.  Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina.

Authors:  M J Berry; I H Brivanlou; T A Jordan; M Meister
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Direction selectivity in the retina: symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function.

Authors:  David I Vaney; Benjamin Sivyer; W Rowland Taylor
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Event-related potentials in the retina and optic tectum of fish.

Authors:  T H Bullock; M H Hofmann; F K Nahm; J G New; J C Prechtl
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Synchronized firing among retinal ganglion cells signals motion reversal.

Authors:  Greg Schwartz; Sam Taylor; Clark Fisher; Rob Harris; Michael J Berry
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Rapid neural coding in the retina with relative spike latencies.

Authors:  Tim Gollisch; Markus Meister
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Dynamic properties of human visual evoked and omitted stimulus potentials.

Authors:  T H Bullock; S Karamürsel; J Z Achimowicz; M C McClune; C Başar-Eroglu
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-07

7.  The neural circuit mechanisms underlying the retinal response to motion reversal.

Authors:  Eric Y Chen; Janice Chou; Jeongsook Park; Greg Schwartz; Michael J Berry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Analyzing biological and artificial neural networks: challenges with opportunities for synergy?

Authors:  David Gt Barrett; Ari S Morcos; Jakob H Macke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Sophisticated temporal pattern recognition in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Greg Schwartz; Michael J Berry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Deep supervised, but not unsupervised, models may explain IT cortical representation.

Authors:  Seyed-Mahdi Khaligh-Razavi; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  1 in total

1.  Simple model for encoding natural images by retinal ganglion cells with nonlinear spatial integration.

Authors:  Jian K Liu; Dimokratis Karamanlis; Tim Gollisch
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.475

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.