Literature DB >> 17689952

From response to stimulus: adaptive sampling in sensory physiology.

Jan Benda1, Tim Gollisch, Christian K Machens, Andreas Vm Herz.   

Abstract

Sensory systems extract behaviorally relevant information from a continuous stream of complex high-dimensional input signals. Understanding the detailed dynamics and precise neural code, even of a single neuron, is therefore a non-trivial task. Automated closed-loop approaches that integrate data analysis in the experimental design ease the investigation of sensory systems in three directions: First, adaptive sampling speeds up the data acquisition and thus increases the yield of an experiment. Second, model-driven stimulus exploration improves the quality of experimental data needed to discriminate between alternative hypotheses. Third, information-theoretic data analyses open up novel ways to search for those stimuli that are most efficient in driving a given neuron in terms of its firing rate or coding quality. Examples from different sensory systems show that, in all three directions, substantial progress can be achieved once rapid online data analysis, adaptive sampling, and computational modeling are tightly integrated into experiments.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17689952     DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  21 in total

1.  Automating the design of informative sequences of sensory stimuli.

Authors:  Jeremy Lewi; David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Searching for optimal stimuli: ascending a neuron's response function.

Authors:  Melinda Evrithiki Koelling; Duane Q Nykamp
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Online stimulus optimization rapidly reveals multidimensional selectivity in auditory cortical neurons.

Authors:  Anna R Chambers; Kenneth E Hancock; Kamal Sen; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Conjoint psychometric field estimation for bilateral audiometry.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour; James C DiLorenzo; Kiron A Sukesan; Xinyu D Song; Jeff Y Chen; Eleanor A Degen; Katherine L Heisey; Roman Garnett
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-06

Review 5.  The past, present, and future of real-time control in cellular electrophysiology.

Authors:  Jennifer A Bauer; Katherine M Lambert; John A White
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Ideal observer analysis of signal quality in retinal circuits.

Authors:  Robert G Smith; Narender K Dhingra
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 21.198

7.  Dethroning the Fano Factor: A Flexible, Model-Based Approach to Partitioning Neural Variability.

Authors:  Adam S Charles; Mijung Park; J Patrick Weller; Gregory D Horwitz; Jonathan W Pillow
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Active learning of cortical connectivity from two-photon imaging data.

Authors:  Martín A Bertrán; Natalia L Martínez; Ye Wang; David Dunson; Guillermo Sapiro; Dario Ringach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inception loops discover what excites neurons most using deep predictive models.

Authors:  Edgar Y Walker; Fabian H Sinz; Erick Cobos; Taliah Muhammad; Emmanouil Froudarakis; Paul G Fahey; Alexander S Ecker; Jacob Reimer; Xaq Pitkow; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  The iso-response method: measuring neuronal stimulus integration with closed-loop experiments.

Authors:  Tim Gollisch; Andreas V M Herz
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.