| Literature DB >> 31683529 |
Mercè Hereu1, Sara Ramos-Romero2,3, Roser Marín-Valls4, Susana Amézqueta5, Bernat Miralles-Pérez6, Marta Romeu7, Lucía Méndez8, Isabel Medina9, Josep Lluís Torres10.
Abstract
Some functional food components may help maintain homeostasis by promoting balanced gut microbiota. Here, we explore the possible complementary effects of d-fagomine and ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3 PUFAs) eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid (EPA/DHA 1:1) on putatively beneficial gut bacterial strains. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were supplemented with d-fagomine, ω-3 PUFAs, or both, for 23 weeks. Bacterial subgroups were evaluated in fecal DNA by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and short-chain fatty acids were determined by gas chromatography. We found that the populations of the genus Prevotella remained stable over time in animals supplemented with d-fagomine, independently of ω-3 PUFA supplementation. Animals in these groups gained less weight than controls and rats given only ω-3 PUFAs. d-Fagomine supplementation together with ω-3 PUFAs maintained the relative populations of Bacteroides. ω-3 PUFAs alone or combined with d-fagomine reduced the amount of acetic acid and total short-chain fatty acids in feces. The plasma levels of pro-inflammatory arachidonic acid derived metabolites, triglycerides and cholesterol were lower in both groups supplemented with ω-3 PUFAs. The d-fagomine and ω-3 PUFAs combination provided the functional benefits of each supplement. Notably, it helped stabilize populations of Prevotella in the rat intestinal tract while reducing weight gain and providing the anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular benefits of ω-3 PUFAs.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteroides; Prevotella; Weight; d-fagomine; gut microbiota; iminocyclitol; iminosugar; ω-3 PUFAs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31683529 PMCID: PMC6893428 DOI: 10.3390/nu11112606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and conditions.
| Target Bacteria | Annealing Temperature (°C) | Sequences (5′-3′) | Positive Control DNA | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Bacteria | 65 | F: ACT CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC AGT | (a) | [ |
| Bacteroidetes | 62 | F: ACG CTA GCT ACA GGC TTA A |
| [ |
| Firmicutes | 52 | F: CTG ATG GAG CAA CGC CGC GT |
| [ |
| Lactobacillales | 60 | F: AGC AGT AGG GAA TCT TCC A |
| [ |
| Bifidobacteriales | 55 | F: CTC CTG GAA ACG GGT GG |
| [ |
|
| 60 | F: GGT TCT GAG AGG AGG TCC C |
| [ |
|
| 60 | F: CAG CAG CCG CGG TAA TA |
| [ |
a The positive control DNA used for the evaluation of Total Bacteria for each subgroup was the one selected as positive control for that subgroup.
Feed and energy intake, body weight, and plasma variables of rats supplemented with d-fagomine and/or ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) for 23 weeks. CTL, control group; FG, group supplemented with d-fagomine; ω-3, group supplemented with ω-3 PUFAs (EPA/DHA 1:1); and FG + ω-3, group supplemented with both d-fagomine and ω-3 PUFAs.
| Variables | CTL | FG | ω-3 | FG + ω-3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | |
| Feed intake | 4.6 | 0.5 | 4.8 | 0.4 | 4.6 | 0.5 | 4.9 | 0.4 |
| Energy intake δ | 13.3 | 1.4 | 13.8 | 1.2 | 13.4 | 1.3 | 14.1 | 1.3 |
| Initial body weight (g) | 373 | 7 | 360 | 3 | 363 | 7 | 360 | 7 |
| Final body weight (g) | 540 | 16 | 493* | 5 | 523 | 13 | 497 * | 11 |
| Fasting glucose & (mg/dL) | 65 | 2 | 62 | 1 | 67 | 2 | 63 | 2 |
| Fasting insulin & (ng/mL) | 0.56 | 0.10 | 0.34 | 0.03 | 0.65† | 0.07 | 0.43 | 0.06 |
| AUC from OGTT | 3750 | 246.4 | 3212 | 246.1 | 3117 | 152.4 | 2674 | 107.5 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 0.69 | 0.02 | 0.61* | 0.02 | 0.56***† | 0.01 | 0.53*** | 0.02 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3.61 | 0.04 | 3.30** | 0.03 | 3.23*** | 0.08 | 3.24*** | 0.06 |
| HDL/LDL | 2.82 | 0.08 | 2.13*** | 0.06 | 2.34*** | 0.03 | 2.11***φ | 0.04 |
δ Energy intake is estimated as metabolizable energy based on Atwater factors: 4 kcal/g protein, 9 kcal/g fat, and 4 kcal/g available carbohydrates. & Samples from week 21. Data are presented as means with their standard errors of the mean; n = 9 per group. Comparisons were conducted using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. CTL; †p < 0.05 vs. FG; φp < 0.05 vs. ω-3.
Figure 1Body weight gain (a) and perigonadal fat (b) of the different groups (CTL, FG, ω-3 and FG + ω-3) of Sprague–Dawley rats fed a standard diet for 23 weeks. The data represent means with their standard errors. Comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA for repeated measures (a), or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test (b). *p < 0.05 FG vs. CTL group; δp < 0.05 FG + ω-3 vs. CTL group.
Figure 2Lipid mediators from arachidonic acid (ARA): 5HETE (a), 11HETE (b), 12HETE (c), 15HETE (d) and 20HETE (e) in plasma, at the end of the study of the different groups (CTL, FG, ω-3 and FG + ω-3) of Sprague-Dawley rats fed a standard diet for 23 weeks. Data are presented as means with their standard error. Comparisons were conducted using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. CTL; †p < 0.05 vs. FG.
Figure 3Bacteroidetes (a), Firmicutes (b), Bacteroidetes:Firmicutes ratio (c), Prevotella (d), Bacteroides (e), Prevotella:Bacteroides ratio (f), Lactobacillales (g) and Bifidobacteriales (h) in fecal samples after 21 weeks, of the different groups (CTL, FG, ω-3 and FG + ω-3) of Sprague–Dawley rats fed a standard diet. Data are presented as means with their standard error. Comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. *p < 0.05 vs. CTL; †p < 0.05 vs. FG.
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in feces after 21 weeks. CTL, control group; FG, group supplemented with d-fagomine; ω-3, group supplemented with ω-3 PUFAs (EPA/DHA 1:1); and FG + ω-3, group supplemented with both d-fagomine and ω-3 PUFAs.
| SCFAs | CTL | FG | ω-3 | FG + ω-3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | |
| Acetic acid | 115 | 13 | 125 | 14 | 23*** | 6 | 19*** | 4 |
| Propionic acid | 13.5 | 0.9 | 15.7 | 3.6 | 9.2 | 1.6 | 10 | 2 |
| Isobutyric acid | 2.7 | 0.2 | 0.9*** | 0.1 | 0.9*** | 0.2 | 0.9*** | 0.1 |
| Butyric acid | 17 | 2 | 27 | 9 | 12 | 3 | 16 | 3 |
| Isovaleric acid | 1.8 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 |
| Valeric acid | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 0.2 |
| Total SCFAs | 152 | 9 | 158 | 19 | 48*** | 11 | 49*** | 7 |
Data are presented as means with their standard errors of the mean; n = 9 per group. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are given as millimoles per kilogram of feces. Comparisons were conducted using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. ***p < 0.001 vs. CTL.