Literature DB >> 3167040

Helix stability in prokaryotic promoter regions.

H Margalit1, B A Shapiro, R Nussinov, J Owens, R L Jernigan.   

Abstract

Prokaryotic promoters have been extensively studied to relate sequence features to promoter function. Here we examine the relationship between double-helix stability and promoter activity. The double-helix stability is evaluated from sequence data by free energy computation, based on reported values of dinucleotide free energies for strand separation. For a collection of 168 promoters, we find that within a 500-nucleotide span around the transcription initiation site the -10 region is the least stable. There is no correlation between the free energies and the rates of RNA polymerase-promoter open complex formation measured for 25 promoters. We also compare the free energies of 121 promoter mutations across the -35 and -10 consensus regions with the free energies of the corresponding wild-type sequences. These pairwise mutant-wild-type comparisons provide a particularly good test since the examined sequences differ only in one nucleotide so that all other sequence-dependent effects remain the same. About 80% of the mutations in the -10 region that show increased/reduced promoter activity are less/more stable than the wild types. The observed high free energy peak and the mutation data strongly support the conjecture that the instability, or melting properties, of the -10 region plays a significant role in promoter function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3167040     DOI: 10.1021/bi00414a035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  11 in total

1.  Hidden Markov models from molecular dynamics simulations on DNA.

Authors:  Kelly M Thayer; D L Beveridge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  In vitro transcription of pe38/polyhedrin hybrid promoters reveals sequences essential for recognition by the baculovirus-induced RNA polymerase and for the strength of very late viral promoters.

Authors:  R M Mans; D Knebel-Mörsdorf
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  A mutant RNA polymerase that forms unusual open promoter complexes.

Authors:  K Severinov; S A Darst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Next generation sequencing-based parallel analysis of melting kinetics of 4096 variants of a bacterial promoter.

Authors:  Ewa Heyduk; Tomasz Heyduk
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 5.  The Context-Dependent Influence of Promoter Sequence Motifs on Transcription Initiation Kinetics and Regulation.

Authors:  Drake Jensen; Eric A Galburt
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Compilation of E. coli mRNA promoter sequences.

Authors:  S Lisser; H Margalit
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Identification and annotation of promoter regions in microbial genome sequences on the basis of DNA stability.

Authors:  Vetriselvi Rangannan; Manju Bansal
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Distinguishing between productive and abortive promoters using a random forest classifier in Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

Authors:  Verónica Lloréns-Rico; Maria Lluch-Senar; Luis Serrano
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Structural properties of promoters: similarities and differences between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Authors:  Aditi Kanhere; Manju Bansal
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Human Pol II promoter recognition based on primary sequences and free energy of dinucleotides.

Authors:  Jian-Yi Yang; Yu Zhou; Zu-Guo Yu; Vo Anh; Li-Qian Zhou
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.