I Benoy1, L Xu2, D Vanden Broeck3, M Poljak4, A Oštrbenk Valenčak4, M Arbyn5, J Bogers6. 1. Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, AML Sonic Healthcare, Antwerp, Belgium; National Reference Centre for HPV, Brussels, Belgium; AMBIOR, Laboratory for Cell Biology & Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 2. Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, AML Sonic Healthcare, Antwerp, Belgium; National Reference Centre for HPV, Brussels, Belgium; International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 4. Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. 5. Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: Marc.arbyn@Sciensano.be. 6. Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, AML Sonic Healthcare, Antwerp, Belgium; National Reference Centre for HPV, Brussels, Belgium; AMBIOR, Laboratory for Cell Biology & Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The VALGENT framework is developed to assess the clinical performance of HPV tests that offer genotyping capability. Samples from the VALGENT-3 panel are used to identify an optimal viral concentration threshold for the RIATOL qPCR HPV genotyping assay (RIATOL qPCR) to assure non-inferior accuracy to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), compared to Qiagen Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2), a standard comparator test validated for cervical cancer screening. STUDY DESIGN: The VALGENT-3 panel comprised 1300 samples from women participating in the Slovenian cervical cancer screening programme, enriched with 300 samples from women with abnormal cytology. In follow- up, 126 women were diagnosed with CIN2+ (defined as diseased) and 1167 women had two consecutive negative Pap smears (defined as non-diseased). All 1600 samples were analyzed with the RIATOL qPCR. Viral concentration was expressed as viral log10 of the number of copies/ml. A zone of viral concentration cut-offs was defined by relative ROC analysis where the sensitivity and specificity were not inferior to HC2. RESULTS: The RIATOL qPCR had a sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ of 97.6% (CI: 93.2-99.5%) and 85.1% (CI: 82.9-87.1%), respectively, when the analytical cut off was used. At a cut off of 6.5, RIATOL qPCR had a sensitivity of 96.0% (CI: 91.0-98.7%) and a specificity of 89.5% (87.6-91.2%). At optimized cut off, accuracy of the qPCR was non-inferior to the HC2 with a relative sensitivity of 1.00 [CI: 0.95-1.05 (p = 0.006)] and relative specificity of 1.00 [CI: 0.98-1.01 (p = 0.0069)]. CONCLUSIONS: The RIATOL qPCR has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CIN2 + . By using a fixed cut-off based on viral concentration, the test is non-inferior to HC2. HPV tests that provide viral concentration measurements or other quantifiable signals allow flexibility to optimize accuracy required for cervical cancer screening.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The VALGENT framework is developed to assess the clinical performance of HPV tests that offer genotyping capability. Samples from the VALGENT-3 panel are used to identify an optimal viral concentration threshold for the RIATOL qPCR HPV genotyping assay (RIATOL qPCR) to assure non-inferior accuracy to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), compared to Qiagen Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2), a standard comparator test validated for cervical cancer screening. STUDY DESIGN: The VALGENT-3 panel comprised 1300 samples from women participating in the Slovenian cervical cancer screening programme, enriched with 300 samples from women with abnormal cytology. In follow- up, 126 women were diagnosed with CIN2+ (defined as diseased) and 1167 women had two consecutive negative Pap smears (defined as non-diseased). All 1600 samples were analyzed with the RIATOL qPCR. Viral concentration was expressed as viral log10 of the number of copies/ml. A zone of viral concentration cut-offs was defined by relative ROC analysis where the sensitivity and specificity were not inferior to HC2. RESULTS: The RIATOL qPCR had a sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ of 97.6% (CI: 93.2-99.5%) and 85.1% (CI: 82.9-87.1%), respectively, when the analytical cut off was used. At a cut off of 6.5, RIATOL qPCR had a sensitivity of 96.0% (CI: 91.0-98.7%) and a specificity of 89.5% (87.6-91.2%). At optimized cut off, accuracy of the qPCR was non-inferior to the HC2 with a relative sensitivity of 1.00 [CI: 0.95-1.05 (p = 0.006)] and relative specificity of 1.00 [CI: 0.98-1.01 (p = 0.0069)]. CONCLUSIONS: The RIATOL qPCR has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CIN2 + . By using a fixed cut-off based on viral concentration, the test is non-inferior to HC2. HPV tests that provide viral concentration measurements or other quantifiable signals allow flexibility to optimize accuracy required for cervical cancer screening.
Authors: Neil H Wood; Koketso S Makua; Ramokone L Lebelo; Nina Redzic; Ina Benoy; Olivier M Vanderveken; Johannes Bogers Journal: Adv Virol Date: 2020-08-26