Literature DB >> 31666284

Comparative Effectiveness of Two Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening for Those at Increased Risk Based on Family History: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Electra D Paskett1,2,3,4, Brittany M Bernardo5, Gregory S Young6, Mira L Katz5,7, Paul L Reiter5,7, Cathy M Tatum5, Jill M Oliveri5, Cecilia R DeGraffinreid5, Darrell Mason Gray5,8, Rachel Pearlman9, Heather Hampel9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: First-degree relatives (FDR) of patients with colorectal cancer are at risk for colorectal cancer, but may not be up to date with colorectal cancer screening. We sought to determine whether a one-time recommendation about needing colorectal cancer screening using patient navigation (PN) was better than just receiving the recommendation only.
METHODS: Participants were FDRs of patients with Lynch syndrome-negative colorectal cancer from participating Ohio hospitals. FDRs from 259 families were randomized to a website intervention (528 individuals), which included a survey and personal colorectal cancer screening recommendation, while those from 254 families were randomized to the website plus telephonic PN intervention (515 individuals). Primary outcome was adherence to the personal screening recommendation (to get screened or not to get screened) received from the website. Secondary outcomes examined who benefited from adding PN.
RESULTS: At the end of the 14-month follow-up, 78.6% of participants were adherent to their recommendation for colorectal cancer screening with adherence similar between arms (P = 0.14). Among those who received a recommendation to have a colonoscopy immediately, the website plus PN intervention significantly increased the odds of receiving screening, compared with the website intervention (OR: 2.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-5.28).
CONCLUSIONS: Addition of PN to a website intervention did not improve adherence to a colorectal cancer screening recommendation overall; however, the addition of PN was more effective in increasing adherence among FDRs who needed screening immediately. IMPACT: These findings provide important information as to when the additional costs of PN are needed to assure colorectal cancer screening among those at high risk for colorectal cancer. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31666284      PMCID: PMC6954294          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  29 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Usha Menon; Allison Burness; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mack T Ruffin; Michael D Fetters; Masahito Jimbo
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  An exploratory mixed-methods crossover study comparing DVD- vs. Web-based patient decision support in three conditions: The importance of patient perspectives.

Authors:  Meghan C Halley; Katharine A S Rendle; Katherine A Gillespie; Katherine M Stanley; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Nora Horick; Anita Y Kinney; Dianne M Finkelstein; Kathleen Garrett; Robert W Haile; Noralane M Lindor; Polly A Newcomb; Robert S Sandler; Carol Burke; Deirdre A Hill; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brittany M Bernardo; Xiaochen Zhang; Chloe M Beverly Hery; Rachel J Meadows; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The Family Health Promotion Project (FHPP): design and baseline data from a randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in high risk families.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Al Marcus; Anita Kinney; Deborah Bowen; Dianne M Finkelstein; Nora Horick; Kathleen Garrett; Robert Haile; Robert Sandler; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Opt-Out Patient Navigation to Improve Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Homeless Women.

Authors:  Ramin Asgary; Ramesh Naderi; Juan Wisnivesky
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Implementation of evidence-based patient navigation programs.

Authors:  Karen M Freund
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  Underuse and Overuse of Colonoscopy for Repeat Screening and Surveillance in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Robert S Sandler; Janet M Grubber; Marcus R Johnson; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  A randomized controlled trial of a tailored navigation and a standard intervention in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Heather Bittner-Fagan; Constantine Daskalakis; Randa Sifri; Sally W Vernon; James Cocroft; Melissa Dicarlo; Nora Katurakes; Jocelyn Andrel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Evidenced-Based Screening Strategies for a Positive Family History.

Authors:  Jennifer M Kolb; Dennis J Ahnen; N Jewel Samadder
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-04-14

Review 2.  Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Sarah Knerr; Tia L Kauffman; Nangel M Lindberg; Katherine P Anderson; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Marian J Gilmore; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Galen Joseph; Stephanie A Kraft; Jamilyn M Zepp; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-11-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.