Literature DB >> 17689600

Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Mack T Ruffin1, Michael D Fetters, Masahito Jimbo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the burden of colorectal cancer and improved health care outcomes with early detection and treatment, screening rates among eligible adults are low. We previously developed through a series of studies an interactive electronic tool, Colorectal Web, to promote colorectal cancer screening.
METHOD: From May 2002 to December 2003, we conducted a randomized controlled trial of Colorectal Web compared to a standard Web site on colorectal cancer screening in urban, suburban, and rural communities in Michigan with high colorectal cancer burden. Study participants were age 50 years and older, with no previous colorectal cancer screening. Major outcome was screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention.
RESULTS: 174 eligible adults were randomized and participated. Immediately post-intervention, Colorectal Web participants were significantly more likely to have a preferred colorectal cancer screening method, but this difference did not persist at subsequent follow-up. Eighty-nine participants had been screened for colorectal cancer by 24 weeks post-intervention. The probability of being screened for the Colorectal Web intervention study arm compared to the control is OR=3.23 (2.73-3.50 95% Confidence Interval).
CONCLUSION: Colorectal Web is more effective than a standard colorectal cancer Web site at prompting previously unscreened individuals to choose a preferred colorectal cancer screening test and to be screened for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17689600     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  52 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Leona K Bartholomew; Amy McQueen; Judy L Bettencourt; Anthony Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; David Lairson; Wenyaw Chan; S T Hawley; R E Myers
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-06

Review 2.  Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Usha Menon; Allison Burness; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests and screening test use in a large multispecialty primary care practice.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Amy McQueen; L Kay Bartholomew; Anthony J Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; Ronald Myers; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Inclusion of underserved racial and ethnic groups in cancer intervention research using new media: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Hayley S Thompson; Rachel C Shelton; Jamie Mitchell; Tara Eaton; Pamela Valera; Anne Katz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013-12

5.  Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices.

Authors:  Michael D Fetters; Leslie A Curry; John W Creswell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Rhonda Belue; Stéphanie Wahab; Kathryn Rugen; Anita Y Kinney; Peter Maramaldi; Debra Wujcik; Laura A Szalacha
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-12

7.  An exploratory mixed-methods crossover study comparing DVD- vs. Web-based patient decision support in three conditions: The importance of patient perspectives.

Authors:  Meghan C Halley; Katharine A S Rendle; Katherine A Gillespie; Katherine M Stanley; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Lay Beliefs About the Accuracy and Value of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Megan C Roberts; Rebecca A Ferrer; Katharine A Rendle; Sarah C Kobrin; Stephen H Taplin; Bradford W Hesse; William M P Klein
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Public health and cooperative group partnership: a colorectal cancer intervention.

Authors:  Sherri G Homan; Bob R Steward; Jane M Armer
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.315

10.  Uptake in cancer screening programmes: a priority in cancer control.

Authors:  D P Weller; C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.