Literature DB >> 28033027

Implementation of evidence-based patient navigation programs.

Karen M Freund1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient navigation refers to a direct patient care role that links patients with clinical providers and their support system and provides individualized support during cancer care, ensuring that patients have access to the knowledge and resources necessary to complete recommended treatment. While most reports have studied the role of patient navigators during the cancer screening or diagnostic process, emerging evidence indicates the benefits of patient navigation during active cancer treatment. DISCUSSION: Reports in the literature are conflicting on the impact of patient navigation during cancer care and on the benefits to timely or quality care in all populations. Recent sub-analyses of the Patient Navigation Research Program data demonstrated specifically the benefits of targeting patient navigation to the most vulnerable populations, including those with low educational attainment, low income and unstable housing, less social support, multiple comorbidities, and minority race/ethnicity.
CONCLUSION: The implications of the Patient Navigation Research Program are that this resource is best utilized when directed to support the care of patients at locations with known challenges to timely care and for specific patients with risk factors for delays in care, including comorbidities, low educational attainment and low income. Implementation of patient navigation programs requires the following processes: needs assessment, selection of a navigator to meet the community and care needs, supervision and integration of the navigator into clinical processes, and systems support to facilitate the identification and tracking of those patients requiring patient navigation. There is a need for ongoing research on methods to fund and sustain patient navigation programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28033027     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1266078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  18 in total

1.  Innovating Cancer Care Delivery: the Example of the 4R Oncology Model for Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Julia Trosman; Christine Weldon; Sheetal Kircher; William Gradishar; Al Benson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11

2.  The early dissemination of patient navigation interventions: results of a respondent-driven sample survey.

Authors:  Patricia A Valverde; Elizabeth Calhoun; Angelina Esparza; Kristen J Wells; Betsy C Risendal
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  The Impact of a Community Resource Navigator Program on Patient Trust.

Authors:  Alex Bryant; Aria Walsh-Felz; Jill Jacklitz; Sara Lindberg
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  2020-09

4.  Helping Men Find Their Way: Improving Prostate Cancer Clinic Attendance via Patient Navigation.

Authors:  Ryan W Dobbs; James Stinson; Shaleen R Vasavada; Brandon M Caldwell; Vincent L Freeman; Daniel F Garvey; Jack Lu; Daniel M Moreira; Michael R Abern
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-06

5.  Comparative Effectiveness of Two Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening for Those at Increased Risk Based on Family History: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Brittany M Bernardo; Gregory S Young; Mira L Katz; Paul L Reiter; Cathy M Tatum; Jill M Oliveri; Cecilia R DeGraffinreid; Darrell Mason Gray; Rachel Pearlman; Heather Hampel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Using Implementation Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies for the Delivery of a Cancer Prevention and Control Phone Navigation Program: A Collaboration With 2-1-1.

Authors:  Lynn N Ibekwe; Timothy J Walker; Ebun Ebunlomo; Katharine Ball Ricks; Sapna Prasad; Lara S Savas; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2020-10-09

Review 7.  Patient Navigation in Cancer: The Business Case to Support Clinical Needs.

Authors:  Ronald M Kline; Gabrielle B Rocque; Elizabeth A Rohan; Kris A Blackley; Cynthia A Cantril; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Howard A Burris; Lawrence N Shulman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 8.  The impact of income and education on lung cancer screening utilization, eligibility, and outcomes: a narrative review of socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Samuel Castro; Ernesto Sosa; Vanessa Lozano; Aamna Akhtar; Kyra Love; Jeanette Duffels; Dan J Raz; Jae Y Kim; Virginia Sun; Loretta Erhunmwunsee
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.005

Review 9.  Factors Influencing the Implementation of Patient Navigation Programs for Adults with Complex Needs: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kristina M Kokorelias; Jessica E Shiers-Hanley; Jorge Rios; Amanda Knoepfli; Sander L Hitzig
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2021-07-17

10.  Fundamental Elements in Training Patient Navigators and Their Involvement in Promoting Public Cervical Cancer Screening Knowledge and Practices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Joanes Faustine Mboineki; Panpan Wang; Changying Chen
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.