Literature DB >> 31665286

Pre-conception 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and fecundability.

A M Z Jukic1,2, D D Baird2, C R Weinberg3, A J Wilcox2, D R McConnaughey4, A Z Steiner5.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Is pre-conception 25(OH)D associated with the per cycle probability of conception, i.e fecundability, in a prospective cohort study? SUMMARY ANSWER: There are suggestive associations of high 25(OH)D (at least 50 ng/ml) with increased fecundability and low 25(OH)D (<20 ng/ml) with reduced fecundability, but the estimates were imprecise. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Vitamin D has been associated with reproductive function and fertility in animal studies, but few human studies exist. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This community-based prospective cohort study included 522 women attempting to become pregnant between 2010 and 2016. The women completed online daily and monthly diaries until a positive home pregnancy test was observed or 12 months had elapsed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: The study included women from central North Carolina who were aged 30-44 with no history of infertility, with no more than 3 months of attempt time at recruitment. Women recorded vaginal bleeding so that the ongoing number of attempt cycles could be counted and used to quantify a woman's pregnancy attempt time. Blood collected at the study entry was analysed for 25(OH)D using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Associations with fecundability were estimated with a log-binomial discrete time-to-event model. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among 522 women, 257 conceived during the study. The mean age was 33 years and the mean 25(OH)D was 36 ng/ml. There was an estimated 10% higher fecundability with each 10 ng/ml increase in 25(OH)D (fecundability ratio (FR) 1.10, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.25). The suggestive dose-response association with the continuous measure of 25(OH)D was driven by women in the lowest and the highest categories of 25(OH)D. Compared to women with 25(OH)D of 30-40 ng/ml, women below 20 ng/ml had an estimated 45% reduction in fecundability (FR (CI): 0.55 (0.23, 1.32)), and women with at least 50 ng/ml had an estimated 35% increase in fecundability (FR (CI): 1.35 (0.95, 1.91)). Across these three categories (25(OH)D of <20 ng/ml, 30-40 ng/ml and > 50 ng/ml), the probability of taking longer than 6 months to conceive was, respectively, 51% (17%, 74%), 28% (17%, 39%) and 15% (10%, 37%). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: While the distribution of 25(OH)D was wide, the number of observed cycles with high 25(OH)D (N = 107) or low 25(OH)D (N = 56) was small. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Our findings are consistent with prior reports of reduced fertility in women with 25(OH)D concentrations below the clinically defined deficiency level (20 ng/ml). Further studies are needed to evaluate the possible reproductive benefits of considerably higher 25(OH)D concentration (>50 ng/ml). STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award numbers R00HD079659 and R01HD067683 and supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, under projects ES103086, ES049003 and ES044003. ClearBlue ovulation predictor kits were generously donated to AMZJ and AJW by Swiss Precision Diagnostics. Drs Wilcox and Jukic report non-financial support from Swiss Precision Diagnostics during the conduct of the study; Dr Jukic reports non-financial support from Theralogix, LLC, outside the submitted work. Otherwise there are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conception; fertility; pregnant; time to pregnancy; vitamin D

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31665286      PMCID: PMC7209776          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  49 in total

1.  Vitamin D deficiency and pregnancy rates in women undergoing single embryo, blastocyst stage, transfer (SET) for IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Nikolaos P Polyzos; Ellen Anckaert; Luis Guzman; Johan Schiettecatte; Lisbet Van Landuyt; Michel Camus; Johan Smitz; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Vitamin D is an important factor in estrogen biosynthesis of both female and male gonads.

Authors:  K Kinuta; H Tanaka; T Moriwake; K Aya; S Kato; Y Seino
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Targeted ablation of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D 1alpha -hydroxylase enzyme: evidence for skeletal, reproductive, and immune dysfunction.

Authors:  D K Panda; D Miao; M L Tremblay; J Sirois; R Farookhi; G N Hendy; D Goltzman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Association of vitamin D intake and serum levels with fertility: results from the Lifestyle and Fertility Study.

Authors:  June L Fung; Terryl J Hartman; Rosemary L Schleicher; Marlene B Goldman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Reproductive defects are corrected in vitamin d-deficient female rats fed a high calcium, phosphorus and lactose diet.

Authors:  Laura E Johnson; Hector F DeLuca
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  The effects of calcium-vitamin D and metformin on polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot study.

Authors:  Batool Rashidi; Fedieh Haghollahi; Mamak Shariat; Farid Zayerii
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.705

7.  Reduced fecundity of vitamin D deficient rats.

Authors:  J P Hickie; D M Lavigne; W D Woodward
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1983

Review 8.  Serum vitamin D status and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shi Shi Lv; Ji Ying Wang; Xiao Qian Wang; Yan Wang; Yong Xu
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Replete vitamin D stores predict reproductive success following in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Sebiha Ozkan; Sangita Jindal; Keri Greenseid; Jun Shu; Gohar Zeitlian; Cheryl Hickmon; Lubna Pal
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sara Abedi; Mahboubeh Taebi; Mohammad Hosein Nasr Esfahani
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-01-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  Preconception vitamin D and miscarriage in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  A Subramanian; A Z Steiner; C R Weinberg; G L Doss; A M Z Jukic
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 6.353

Review 2.  Calcifediol (25OHD) Deficiency and Its Treatment in Women's Health and Fertility.

Authors:  Ana Arnanz; Juan A Garcia-Velasco; José Luis Neyro
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  The role of maternal preconception vitamin D status in human offspring sex ratio.

Authors:  Alexandra C Purdue-Smithe; Keewan Kim; Carrie Nobles; Enrique F Schisterman; Karen C Schliep; Neil J Perkins; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Joshua R Freeman; Sonia L Robinson; Jeannie G Radoc; James L Mills; Robert M Silver; Aijun Ye; Sunni L Mumford
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Inflammation and Conception in a Prospective Time-to-Pregnancy Cohort.

Authors:  Anne Marie Z Jukic; Clarice R Weinberg; Sunni L Mumford; Anne Z Steiner
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.860

5.  Serum Vitamin D Concentrations, Time to Pregnancy, and Pregnancy Outcomes among Preconception Couples: A Cohort Study in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Anne Marie Z Jukic; Heqing Song; Lifeng Zhang; Fengyun Yang; Shoule Wu; Dongxiao Yin; Hong Jiang
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 6.  Why do so many trials of vitamin D supplementation fail?

Authors:  Barbara J Boucher
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.335

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.