| Literature DB >> 31665048 |
Abhishek Mishra1, Sachin Awasthi2, Saloni Raj3, Priya Mishra4, Rajeshwar Nath Srivastava5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of musculoskeletal disability among elders and is characterized by late-onset degeneration of articular cartilage. OA affects various joints, commonly hand, knee, and hip, with clinical features that are unique to each joint. This study was initiated to identify and evaluate the role of the ASPN and COMP genes in the development of knee OA.Entities:
Keywords: Case–control; Gene; Gene expression; Knee osteoarthritis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31665048 PMCID: PMC6821012 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1391-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Characteristics of the study population
| Controls (500) | Cases (500) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean ± SD, years) | 55.26 ± 8.26 | 55.86 ± 8.89 | 0.277 |
| Female age (mean ± SD, years) | 55.52 ± 9.04 | 55.67 ± 8.58 | 0.839 |
| Male age (mean ± SD, years) | 54.95 ± 8.09 | 56.15 ± 9.33 | 0.155 |
| BMI (mean ± SD, kg/m2) | 23.39 ± 2.39 | 25.41 ± 3.23 | > 0.001* |
| Female BMI (mean ± SD, kg/m2) | 23.59 ± 2.48 | 25.81 ± 3.55 | > 0.001* |
| Male BMI (mean ± SD, kg/m2) | 23.14 ± 2.25 | 24.84 ± 2.61 | > 0.01* |
| Females ( | 276 (55.2%) | 295 (59.0%) | |
| KL grade 2/3/4 | 224 (44.8%) | 205 (41.0%) | |
| VAS (mean ± SD) | – | 6.14 ± 1.13 | |
| Total WOMAC (mean ± SD) | – | 35.47 ± 8.84 |
BMI body mass index, KL grade Kellgren–Lawrence Grading Scale, VAS visual analog scale, WOMAC The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
*p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant
Genotype association between SNPs in ASPN gene and knee osteoarthritis
| Genotype | All subjects | Women | Men | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (%) | Case (%) | OR (95% CI), | Control (%), 276 | Case (%), 295 | OR (95% CI), | Control (%), 224 | Case (%), 205 | OR (95% CI), | ||
| Genotype | 3739606 | |||||||||
| GG | 261 (52.2) | 238 (47.6) | 1.00 (ref) | 139 (50.36) | 139 (47.79) | 1.00 (ref) | 122 (54.46) | 99 (48.29) | 1.00 (ref) | |
| GT | 209 (41.8) | 217 (43.4) | 1.13 (0.87–1.47), 0.325 | 119 (43.11) | 129 (43.72) | 1.06 (0.75–1.50), 0.703 | 90 (40.17) | 88 (42.92) | 1.20 (0.81–1.79), 0.355 | |
| TT | 30 (6.0) | 45 (09.0) | 1.64 (1.00–2.69), 0.046 | 18 (6.52) | 27 (8.47) | 1.36 (0.71–2.62), 0.341 | 12 (5.35) | 18 (8.78) | 1.84 (0.85–4.02), 0.117 | |
| Allele | G | 731 (73.1) | 693 (69.3) | 1.00 (ref) | 397 (71.92) | 411 (69.66) | 1.00 (ref) | 334 (74.53) | 286 (69.75) | 1.00 (ref) |
| T | 269 (26.9) | 307 (30.7) | 1.20 (0.99–1.46), 0.060 | 155 (28.07) | 179 (30.33) | 1.11 (0.86–1.44), 0.401 | 114 (25.44) | 124 (30.24) | 1.27 (0.94–1.71), 0.116 | |
| Genotype | Rs 331377 | |||||||||
| AA | 201 (40.2) | 183 (36.6) | 1.00 (ref) | 114 (41.30) | 111 (37.62) | 1.00 (ref) | 87 (38.83) | 72 (35.12) | 1.00 (ref) | |
| AG | 154 (30.8) | 166 (33.2) | 1.18,(0.88–1.59), 0.264 | 86 (31.15) | 96 (32.54) | 1.14 (0.77–1.69), 0.493 | 68 (30.35) | 70 (34.14) | 1.24 (0.78–1.96), 0.349 | |
| GG | 145 (29.0) | 151 (30.2) | 1.14 (0.84–1.54), 0.385 | 76 (27.53) | 88 (29.83) | 1.18 (0.80–1.78), 0.368 | 69 (30.80) | 63 (30.73) | 1.10 (0.69–1.75), 0.677 | |
| Allele | A | 556 (55.6) | 532 (53.2) | 1.00 (ref) | 314 (56.88) | 318 (53.89) | 1.00 (ref) | 242 (54.01) | 214 (52.19) | 1.00 (ref) |
| G | 444 (44.4) | 468 (46.8) | 1.10 (0.92–1.31), 0.281 | 238 (43.11) | 272 (46.10) | 1.12 (0.89–1.42), 0.310 | 206 (45.98) | 196 (47.80) | 1.07 (0.82–1.40), 0.593 | |
OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, ref reference category
*p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant
Genotype association between SNP in COMP (HpyCH4IV_rs34467947) gene and knee osteoarthritis (KOA)
| All subjects | Women | Men | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (%) | Case (%) | OR (95% CI), | Control (%), 276 | Case (%), 295 | OR (95% CI), | Control (%), 224 | Case (%), 205 | OR (95% CI), | ||
| Genotype | HpyCH4IV-rs34467947 | |||||||||
| CC | 467 (93.4) | 458 (91.6) | 1.00 (ref) | 259 (93.84) | 272 (92.20) | 1.00 (ref) | 208 (92.85) | 186 (90.73) | 1.00 (ref) | |
| CT | 29 (5.8) | 35 (7.0) | 1.23 (0.74–2.04), 0.423 | 14 (5.07) | 18 (6.10) | 1.22 (0.59–2.51), 0.580 | 15 (6.69) | 17 (8.29) | 1.26 (0.61–2.60), 0.519 | |
| TT | 4 (0.8) | 7 (1.4) | 1.78 (0.51–6.13), 0.351 | 3 (1.08) | 5 (1.69) | 1.58 (0.37–6.70), 0.526 | 1 (0.04) | 2 (0.9) | 2.23 (0.20–24.86), 0.501 | |
| Allele | C | 963 (96.3) | 951 (95.1) | 1.00 (ref) | 532 (96.37) | 562 (95.25) | 1.00 (ref) | 431 (96.20) | 389 (94.87) | 1.00 (ref) |
| T | 37 (3.7) | 49 (4.9) | 1.34 (0.86–2.07), 0.185 | 20 (3.62) | 28 (4.74) | 1.32 (0.73–2.38), 0.344 | 17 (3.79) | 21 (5.12) | 1.36 (0.71–2.63), 0.345 | |
OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, ref reference category
Fig. 1Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed for relative mRNA expression of genes that were involved in the cartilage catabolism in control and case study. Quantitative analysis suggested that expression of ASPN and COMP genes upregulated in case group compared to their respective control. β-Actin served as housekeeping gene for normalization. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 24). *p < 0.05 vs control
Fig. 2a Western blot analysis was performed to understand the protein level of ASPN and COMP in control and case study. b Bar diagram showing the relative protein density after normalization with β-actin. Relative protein density of ASPN and COMP was significantly increased in case study as compared to the control group. Representative blots showing three samples from each group (control and case). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 24). *p < 0.05 vs control